Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Filibusters Are Unconstitutional -- Say Noted Democrats
miles-alexander | miles-alexander

Posted on 05/18/2003 2:16:37 PM PDT by webber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 05/18/2003 2:16:37 PM PDT by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: webber
Since being a DEMONCRAT requires hypocracy this won't even hit the newspapers, unfortunately.
2 posted on 05/18/2003 2:20:50 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
I'm not worried about filibusters. We have used them on our side too to block legislation but not judical nominees. What Repbublicans need to do is make this an issue in the Senate races up in 2004. The DemocRATS think Republicans have a shot of picking up 7-8 seats. That means Republicans would only have to pick up 1 or 2 DemocRAT Senate votes to get a vote of cloture.
3 posted on 05/18/2003 2:22:56 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Howlin; PhiKapMom; Mo1; Amelia
Rules and more Rules..... Just when they are constitutional seems to be at what point the practitioner can use them to his benefit.
4 posted on 05/18/2003 2:31:58 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I agree. George Will said last week that this is what elections are about. If filibustering helps sway swing voters to Republicans then more power to them...er...Republicans, ha.
5 posted on 05/18/2003 2:39:26 PM PDT by rvoitier (There's too many ALs in this world: Al Qaeda Al Jezeera Al Gore Al Sharpton Al Franken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: webber
For some reason, "New Jersey" comes to my mind.
6 posted on 05/18/2003 2:43:58 PM PDT by Mark (Treason doth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
I might also add, it would be extremely dicey constitutionally for the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of the procedures the Senate uses to confirm federal judges.
7 posted on 05/18/2003 2:45:55 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
Since being a DEMONCRAT requires hypocracy this won't even hit the newspapers, unfortunately.

But just turn the tables and let the Republicans try a stunt like this and the howling from the leftist media would be constant and deafening.

8 posted on 05/18/2003 2:53:33 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
"it would be extremely dicey constitutionally for the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of the procedures the Senate uses to confirm federal judges."

But since the GOP also uses it, who would ask the Supreme Court to rule on the illegal use of the filibuster; unless the Supreme Court takes it upon themselves to review it, but I don't know if that's constitutional either.

9 posted on 05/18/2003 2:57:41 PM PDT by webber (Demon-rats: don't confuse me with the constitution, I have have my own rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: webber
Ummm, these Senators are not saying that filibusters are unconstitutional, they are saying that the Cloture Rule - which allows a filibuster (or any debate) to be stopped by a super-majority vote - is unconstitutional.
10 posted on 05/18/2003 3:19:35 PM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonQ
We had to change the spelling in Texas to filiBUSter to accommodate the Ds.
11 posted on 05/18/2003 3:24:33 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
I WISH SOMEONE COULD DROP A FEW MILLION COPIES OF THIS AS FLYERS OVER THE TEXAS CAPITAL. (D.C. IS A NO FLY ZONE)
12 posted on 05/18/2003 3:31:52 PM PDT by OREALLY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: webber
I have read (prove me wrong) that the Senate cloture rules relate solely to LEGISLATION and not APPOINTMENTS. If true, they're not even following their own rules.


Anyone?
13 posted on 05/18/2003 6:29:19 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Nice bit of research.
14 posted on 05/18/2003 6:30:44 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54
I have read (prove me wrong) that the Senate cloture rules relate solely to LEGISLATION and not APPOINTMENTS. If true, they're not even following their own rules.
Maybe it would be better for you to prove you're correct...

Here's the cloture rule......

Rules of the Senate
15 posted on 05/18/2003 7:00:29 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: deport
B>Could you underline the part where it says you're wrong or I'm right? Thanks. ;-)



16 posted on 05/18/2003 7:24:42 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: webber
I'm sure that these quotes were made back when the democRATs were in the majority. That was totally different. Totally.

If the Republicans stand in the way of the democRATs, it's unconstitutional. If the democRATs stand in the way of Republicans, it's courageous.

17 posted on 05/18/2003 7:31:48 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54
I"m not saying you are wrong... Just posting the rules of the Senate..... You may well have read that somewhere.... I can't prove that you did or didn't.
18 posted on 05/18/2003 7:38:06 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: webber
bump
19 posted on 05/18/2003 7:38:10 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54
"..... at any time a motion signed by sixteen Senators, to bring to a close the debate upon any measure, motion, other matter pending before the Senate,....."

Senate confirmations fall within the scope of "any measure, motion, other matter pending before the Senate," and thus, the Cloture rule applies to stopping debate of same.

20 posted on 05/18/2003 8:36:59 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson