Skip to comments.
Clinton to Address JFK Library in Wake of Intern Revelations
NewsMax.com ^
| 5/17/03
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 05/17/2003 7:37:22 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
1
posted on
05/17/2003 7:37:22 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
In fact, Clinton was not impeached for his dalliance with Lewinsky, but because he perjured himself about the relationship in testimony before a federal judge and a grand jury in an attempt to obstruct justice in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. The clinton lovers always conveniently ignore his perjury, obstruction of justice & witness tampering! And the fact that he was fined & found in contempt of Court by a federal judge; was disbarred in Arkansas and barred from pleading a case before the Supreme Court.
2
posted on
05/17/2003 7:43:43 PM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Take W-04........Across America!)
To: kattracks
"The story also fills a gap, however small, in the public record," the paper said. "And it provides some context: Bill Clinton, who was impeached because of his indefensible dalliance with Monica Lewinsky, was not, it turns out, the only Oval Office occupant with an eye for the interns."No, he was impeached because he lied under oath, you maroons.
3
posted on
05/17/2003 7:44:13 PM PDT
by
Endeavor
To: kattracks
Kennedy and Clinton: two of the weakest leaders in the 20th Century.
To: kattracks
This whole thing has clinton's fingerprints all over it. It is his modus operandi. He feels that comparisons with JFK and also Jefferson somehow help him. During the height of impeachment we had the "verdict" of "historians" that Jefferson had a thing going with Sally Hemmings.
The now disgraced historian, Joseph Ellis gave a talk at UNC, and told a story about clinton that I attended, well before the Lewinsky story broke. At the time Ellis was humping his book on Jefferson. He (Ellis) spoke at the White House and clinton approached him afterwards and asked Ellis if he thought that there was any substance to the Jefferson-Hemmings rumors. This conversation took place in the mid-90's before it had become "accepted" that such a liason did exist. At the time Ellis stated that his historical opinion (he has since changed it) was that the liason did *not* occur. At the talk I attended he reported that clinton looked "truly disappointed" to learn this.
I think that clinton thinks that these comparisons show him (clinton) in a better light. I think he's clearly wrong, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that clinton is somehow involved with the latest JFK disclosure.
To: kattracks
Hmmmm? I believe Rush said, "this is just another x42 rewrite the legacy tour".
6
posted on
05/17/2003 7:45:47 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: CyberAnt
RUSH IS RIGHT! It is just X42 rewrite.
7
posted on
05/17/2003 7:48:13 PM PDT
by
jaz.357
(The END of the BEGINNING... is the BEGINNING of the END!)
To: CyberAnt; Lancey Howard; OldFriend; rambo316; Becki; backhoe
ping
8
posted on
05/17/2003 7:49:40 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: Fred Mertz
"Kennedy and Clinton: two of the weakest leaders in the 20th Century."
I think Jimmy Carter has the top honor for weakest.
9
posted on
05/17/2003 7:50:41 PM PDT
by
OneTime
To: Fred Mertz
Kennedy, the pedophile.
10
posted on
05/17/2003 7:51:11 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
To: kattracks
Love the timing. No matter what the pervert tries to do to change the subject, it always comes back at him.....Monica Monica Monica
11
posted on
05/17/2003 7:51:54 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
To: kattracks; cardinal4
Anyone who thinks that clinton's legacy is anything but that stained blue dress is delusional.
12
posted on
05/17/2003 7:52:21 PM PDT
by
Ax
To: kattracks
And by Thursday, the News had tracked down Marion "Mimi" Fahnestock, now a 60-year-old church worker in midtown Manhattan who confirmed that she carried on a sexual relationship with the 35th president from June 1962 to November 1963. Makes you wonder why Mimi decided to "come clean" so quickly.
To: kattracks
Bubba, no matter how you try to pretend otherwise, you're no Jack Kennedy. Kennedy was a better president in three years than you ever could have been in eight. Kennedy had a beautiful, intelligent, classy wife. Kennedy had two bright, attractive, adorable children. And above all...he knew that fine cigars were intended to be smoked after the act of love, not to be used in it.
14
posted on
05/17/2003 7:57:12 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(How do you parody somebody who's a parody of himself?)
To: kattracks
The point universally missed is that Clinton was a psychopath and seriously mentally unstable to commit the acts he felt entitled to commit. His mentality was too dangerous to be in the Oval Office.
15
posted on
05/17/2003 7:58:15 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: kattracks
JFK wasn't the object of a sexual harrasment lawsuit at the time of his affair. He also didn't commit perjury, obstruction of justice and abuse of power to supress the evidence that demonstrated his pattern of behavior. Because of his flagrant disrespect for the law, a woman was denied her day in court.
Impeachment was never about sex; it was about a man using his authority to trample over the "common folk" and set himself above the law.
Never forget!
16
posted on
05/17/2003 7:58:35 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Four more years! Four more years!)
To: CyberAnt
They should hold this on a bridge over a river, and maybe Clinton could take a bite out of Ted just to show him how it's done.
To: kattracks
X42 and her spouse. Figures
18
posted on
05/17/2003 8:04:02 PM PDT
by
Waco
To: kattracks
This is a joke, right ?
19
posted on
05/17/2003 8:06:20 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(primates capitulards toujours en quete de fromage!)
To: kattracks; Howlin; Liz
Clinton will reflect upon his own legacy...This should be breaking news - no?
20
posted on
05/17/2003 8:06:41 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(And it STILL isn’t safe enough to vote DemocRAT or Liberteen…)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson