Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Passes $350 Billion Bush Tax Cut
AP | By MARY DALRYMPLE

Posted on 05/15/2003 8:32:31 PM PDT by Capitalism2003

Edited on 05/15/2003 8:53:48 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

UPDATED 11:50 PM EDT:

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate revived the backbone of President Bush's formula for stimulating a laggard economy Thursday, narrowly passing a $350 billion package of tax cuts that would suspend all taxes on stock dividends for three years.

The Republican bill, passed on a 51-49 mostly party-line vote, is less than half the size Bush sought but one that advances previously scheduled reductions in income tax rates, provides $20 billion in new aid to state and local governments and raises taxes for a few.

It also would increase the child tax credit from $600 to $1,000, gradually eliminate the marriage penalty and encourage new investment by small businesses by allowing them to write off $100,000 in new equipment purchases.

But its biggest feature by far is suspending taxes on stock dividends, a provision added earlier Thursday only after Vice President Dick Cheney was called to break a 50-50 tie on the issue.

Treasury Secretary John Snow called the Senate's action on dividends a ``bold step,'' saying it ``will have a profoundly positive effect on job creation, corporate governance and the well-being of all Americans.''

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said he hoped to begin negotiations next week with the House, which this month passed its own package of $550 billion in tax cuts through 2013.

Bush had asked Congress to abolish taxes on dividends paid to investors at a cost of $400 billion over the next decade, arguing that corporate profits are now effectively taxed twice, once at the corporate level and again by stockholders on the dividends paid to them.

The House instead voted to reduce the top rate on them, as well as capital gains, to 15 percent. Dividends and capital gains are now taxed at a maximum rates of 38.6 percent and 20 percent respectively.

The Senate bill chops dividend taxes in half this year, suspends them entirely in 2004, 2005 and 2006, and restores them in 2007, at a total cost of $124 billion.

Democrats derided the dividend tax suspension, saying it would come at the expense of married couples whose tax breaks were scaled back.

``Americans today who otherwise will receive the relief on the marriage penalty contained in this bill are going to be subsidizing and paying for, in effect, these tax-free dividends,'' said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont.

To hold the votes of moderate Republicans, the package includes $20 billion in new Medicaid and other aid to states and tax and fee increases totaling $90 billion, limiting the net cost of the package over the next decade years to $350 billion.

Democrats argued that a payroll tax holiday rebating some Social Security and Medicare taxes to workers would stimulate the economy faster than suspending dividend taxes, but their ideas were repeatedly rejected by the narrowly GOP-controlled Senate.

``I'm not opposed to creating millionaires. I think the country needs more millionaires,'' said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. ``What I'm opposed to is constantly this other side coming to the floor trying to give breaks to the people that are already at the top at the expense of those at the bottom.''

The bulk of the bill moves up cuts in income tax rates passed by Congress two years ago, increases the child tax credit to $1,000 and gives married couples a tax break. It also lets small businesses expense more of their equipment investments.

The Senate bill still has to be merged with a $550 billion package of tax cuts passed last week by the House, where Republicans rejected Bush's proposal to eliminate dividend taxes. Instead, the House voted to cut the maximum tax rates on both dividends and capital gains to 15 percent. Those maximum rates are now 38.6 percent and 20 percent respectively.

House Republicans criticized the temporary nature of the Senate's action on dividends compared with the House rate cuts that would last a decade.

``My view, it doesn't solve the problem,'' said House Speaker Dennis J. Hastert, R-Ill. ``There needs to be a permanence.''

Two Democrats, Sens. Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Zell Miller of Georgia, gave Republicans the edge they needed for suspending dividend taxation. Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana added a third Democratic vote for final passage of the bill. The Senate Finance Committee had decided earlier to excuse investors from taxes on the first $500 in dividends each year.

Republican George Voinovich of Ohio declared himself the 50th senator to back the plan Thursday morning after the White House agreed to convene a commission to rewrite the entire tax code. Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and Olympia Snowe of Maine voted against the dividend tax suspension.

The Senate had to work within a budget passed last month that limited tax cuts to $350 billion through 2013, forcing Republican tax writers to scramble for new sources of revenue.

The Senate added language blocking companies such as Enron and Global Crossing that overstated their earnings from claiming a tax refund.

Senators also agreed to reformulate Medicare to give rural states more money and to cut taxes on business profits earned abroad and brought back to the United States to 5 percent from 35 percent for one year.

John Breaux, D-La., failed in his attempt to repeal a tax increase on Americans working abroad. Those workers would no longer be able to exclude the first $80,000 of their foreign income from U.S. taxes, but they could claim a credit against any foreign taxes paid.

The bills are S1054 and HR2.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigtime; cheney; dividendtax; ratequalsfailure; senate; taxcuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: Mo1
Yep .. It's all the mans fault

It's almost like she has a distaste for men...I wonder who could have given her an attitude like that?

101 posted on 05/15/2003 10:52:08 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Clinton's amendment is shot down with a voice vote
102 posted on 05/15/2003 10:54:11 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
This sure looks like the same deal as worked out last month:
BUSH COMPROMISES ON TAX CUT
where what was originally $700 Billion turned into $350 Billion.
103 posted on 05/15/2003 10:55:43 PM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist bioweapon production.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
WooooHoooooo!
104 posted on 05/15/2003 10:56:44 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
...I wonder who could have given her an attitude like that?

I read something from somewhere that Hilda's Mother was a big influence on her daughter and taught her not to have much respect for the opposite sex .. and I'm sure Bill proved her mother right

105 posted on 05/15/2003 10:57:16 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
.. and I'm sure Bill proved her mother right

Yea, I guess that was my focus! Bill anyway.

106 posted on 05/15/2003 10:59:13 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Clinton's amendment is shot down with a voice vote

That one can assure all that we can anticipate another inch of "bag" under her eyes in the near future. It's gotta dig at her donchya' think?

107 posted on 05/15/2003 11:02:53 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Is Joe Biden trying to pull a fast one with his amendment??
108 posted on 05/15/2003 11:05:31 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

OK, I guess I was wrong .. it seems that there were talks between the House, THe White and the Senate and they were ok with Joe's amendment and it was passed with a voice vote

ALSO, Joe changed his vote to the Tax Bill from a No to a Yes and wants the record to reflect it
109 posted on 05/15/2003 11:11:39 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
ALSO, Joe changed his vote to the Tax Bill from a No to a Yes and wants the record to reflect it

That I saw and can't see the usefulness of it except to change political reflection upon him. I don't get it.

110 posted on 05/15/2003 11:16:00 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
That I saw and can't see the usefulness of it except to change political reflection upon him. I don't get it.

Because it was such a close vote he had to vote the party line .. My guess is Hillary sent out a memo

Since the bill passed and his vote doesn't make a difference anymore, he can now switch it and claim to be on the side of the people in voting for the tax cuts

He'll use it when he's up for re-election

111 posted on 05/15/2003 11:23:35 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
He'll use it when he's up for re-election

Doing the peoples work again...his liberal crone people that is!

112 posted on 05/15/2003 11:34:50 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
This is all moot really. The States are lining up, and we'll be doing good to break even. No one else sees this pattern? Stop monkeying around with this convoluted tax code and scrap it. Blackbird.
113 posted on 05/16/2003 1:55:27 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
With this package, added on to the package of 2001, over the next few years, we will be getting MORE than Bush campaigned for in 2000. It's a win for us any way you look at it.

Right on. I haven't always been pleased with the President's domestic policy, but his tax cutting performance has been absolutely brilliant.

114 posted on 05/16/2003 4:33:49 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003

with the 90 in offsets, the real total so far is 440, but the media just can't bring itself to say so


115 posted on 05/16/2003 4:43:05 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping. It looks like "W" little trip in Indy paid off. Maybe the thousands waiting in line helped give Bayh the message.

"The vote on final passage was identical to the vote on the dividend amendment except that Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., also voted yes. In a written statement, he said he supported it to take strong action to spur the economy, but would oppose a final House-Senate compromise if it contained the same budget gimmicks or grows larger."

116 posted on 05/16/2003 5:26:31 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

Comment #117 Removed by Moderator

To: Capitalism2003
The bulk of the bill moves up cuts in income tax rates passed by Congress two years ago, increases the child tax credit to $1,000 and gives married couples a tax break.

Quote from below: Taxpayers with investment income of more than $2,600 are not eligible for the credit.

If this is a tax cut for the rich, then I'm a donkey



Rate Tables : Earned Income Credit and the Child Tax Credit

Earned Income Credit

2002

No. of Children

Maximum Credit

Highest AGI*

0

$376

$11,060

1

$2,506

$29,201

2 or more

$4,140

$33,178

Taxpayers with investment income of more than $2,550 are not eligible for the credit.

2003

No. of Children

Maximum Credit

Highest AGI*

0

$382

$11,230

1

$2,547

$29,666

2 or more

$4,204

$33,692

Taxpayers with investment income of more than $2,600 are not eligible for the credit.

* Increase these amounts by $1,000 for joint return filers.

What's New for the Earned Income Credit for 2002?
Beginning in 2002, several changes apply. The computation of the credit is based on AGI rather than modified AGI and on taxable earned income rather than on both taxable and nontaxable earned income. The definition of a qualifying child has been modified, and married taxpayers filing a joint return get some relief from the marriage penalty because the beginning and end points of the phase out range are increased by $1,000.

Child Tax Credit

  

2002

2003

Maximum Credit per Child

$600

$600

Credit begins to phase out
when modified AGI exceeds

$110,000 (MFJ)
$75,000 (SGL,HH,QW)
$55,000 (MFS)

No Change

Additional Child Tax Credit
Is Based on Earned Income in
Excess of

$10,350

$10,500

Return to Rate Tables

Copyright © 1999 - 2003. Block Financial Corporation. All Rights Reserved

118 posted on 05/16/2003 8:52:26 AM PDT by m1-lightning (Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD , the people he chose for his inheritance. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ACAC
This is why a 24/7 filibuster won't work. Anyone can just go home and go to bed.

Nope, not true. Enough DemonRats have to stick around so the pubs cannot vote to end debate. Have to have 60% of votes to end debate. More Demons that leave means fewer votes needed to end debate.

119 posted on 05/16/2003 5:42:16 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
BFD. Temporary dividend cut. The feds are slated to spend 28 trillion dollars in the next decade.

This is terrific news. Since we should have between 130 and 150 trillion of GDP assuming mere modest growth rates, this represents government only taking 11% of GDP. Historically, the feds have averaged about 20%.

So the "whores" will have cut the government in half. That's good, right?

120 posted on 05/16/2003 5:54:24 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson