Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get the Clintons Off the Stage
St. Petersburg Times ^ | 5/15/03 | Susan Estrich

Posted on 05/15/2003 8:15:09 AM PDT by shortstop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: Howlin
whats nice is you know it wont happen... Bill Clinton is sucking up a lot more than air
21 posted on 05/15/2003 8:28:36 AM PDT by woofie (I want a cabal too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
LOL, I hope the RATS don't listen to Susan's good advice. I'm 95% sure they won't.

The RATS' overwhelming urge to engage in vicious personal attacks on Pres. Bush is uncontrollable---kinda like the lustful urges of a certain loathsome Rapist.....

22 posted on 05/15/2003 8:28:38 AM PDT by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
My take is that she knows any reminder of the Clinton's will damage them yet again in 2004. Notice he has been invisible lately?

The money is drying up.
23 posted on 05/15/2003 8:28:45 AM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
When Susan claimed Hillary has the respect of her collegues, I lost it. Susan is mad because there is none of that Clinton absorbed oxygen left for her. She should cut back on those 5 packs of Virginia slims she smokes per day. The carbon monoxide is dimming her comprehension. The only reason Hillary gets anyone's "respect" in the Senate is because they are scared to death of her. You can run Zimbabwe on fear and intimidation, and if she gets her way it will be the same here.

Never piss off Hillary if you work at a Starbucks........

24 posted on 05/15/2003 8:29:12 AM PDT by blackdog (All generalizations are false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: woofie
She does get it. She was a staunch defender of the odd couple during the impeachment fiasco. I think she is being realistic and trying to tell the other RATS that they must let go now, put the Clintons on the shelf and move along. Estrich is genuinely looking to the future of her party, and Hillary is not the one to lead it to its past glories.

Hillary is the France of the RAT party.

25 posted on 05/15/2003 8:30:46 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
She is spot on about this, but I think the democrats are hypnotized by the Clintons and cannot escape their hold.

Indeed they are and it's a blessing for the GOP. Every time clinton opens his mouth, he further discredits the democrat party and harms the candidates trying to break from his mold. Recall how he campaigned for candidates in 2002? Nearly all of them lost and lost big. I say let bill stay out front and center. He's nauseating and it infuriates me to no end but it does appear to help the GOP.

Estrich is right about hillary too. She will never be president. She may have gotten elected in NY but that's a far cry from a national election. And I know many democrat women who can't stand her. Plus, who in their right mind would want bill clinton to be the first man?

26 posted on 05/15/2003 8:31:08 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
I missed that.

You are correct. 66% of Americans can't identify a CURRENT Democrat candidate. However, they are currently all discussing who they don't want - Hillary. Discussing who they don't want, and how to keep her away is hurting them and helping us.
27 posted on 05/15/2003 8:31:30 AM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
The Clintons suck up every bit of the available air.

Good call, Sue, but it about 14 years too late. History will remember the Clintons as parasites that starved out the Democratic Party. Keep yapping, Bill and Hil.

28 posted on 05/15/2003 8:31:32 AM PDT by oyez (Is this a great country or what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
I sent a copy of this to Rush. Let's see if he brings it up.
29 posted on 05/15/2003 8:31:36 AM PDT by shortstop (Win one for the Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
He's a moron. "Style" over substance. He never graduated from Oxford, and now his own spawn hasn't either.

Presstitutes putting out that p.r. BS for him.
30 posted on 05/15/2003 8:34:19 AM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
VERY STRONGLY AGREE . . . .

her unroyal lowness,
her hideous heinous--
Bwitch Shrillery Antoinette
de Fosterizer de Reno-suckface
de Slithering-snake-belly
de Stage-hogger
de Power-monger-supreme
de Marx-idolizer de Beijing-agent
de Infanticide-glorifier
de Poopy-flinger de Sade

richly deserves retirement to a seedy little mental hospital in Appalachia somewhere--nah--they don't need her nor deserve her--in San Francisco somewhere.
31 posted on 05/15/2003 8:35:35 AM PDT by Quix (MAY BIBLE CODE DIGEST IS UP AT biblecodedigest.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify; woofie
Me, too! You hardly want to miss one catty article, do you?

Listen, we DESERVE this, so don't feel bad about it for one minute. We suffered through eight long years of a national group therapy session with these people.

We are DUE.
32 posted on 05/15/2003 8:35:56 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
VERY STRONGLY AGREE . . . .

her unroyal lowness,
her hideous heinous--
Bwitch Shrillery Antoinette
de Fosterizer de Reno-suckface
de Slithering-snake-belly
de Stage-hogger
de Power-monger-supreme
de Marx-idolizer de Beijing-agent
de Infanticide-glorifier
de Poopy-flinger de Sade

richly deserves retirement to a seedy little mental hospital in Appalachia somewhere--nah--they don't need her nor deserve her--

Put her in a solitary padded cell in a seedy mental hospital in San Francisco somewhere.

Put him in the cell across the hall with Reno.

33 posted on 05/15/2003 8:36:12 AM PDT by Quix (MAY BIBLE CODE DIGEST IS UP AT biblecodedigest.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
She didn't graduate???
34 posted on 05/15/2003 8:36:18 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Didn't Sidney Boobenthal once state that he lied to his own journal when he was being investigated? Or was that some other clinton cronie?
And if it was Sideny, why should anybody believe what he writes now?!
35 posted on 05/15/2003 8:36:22 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Its because the media let him off.
36 posted on 05/15/2003 8:37:50 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0
Wow that is in the far reaches of my memory's vault...I think it was someone else
37 posted on 05/15/2003 8:40:21 AM PDT by woofie (I want a cabal too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
The incredible thing about this article is who the author is. Her credentials as a card-carrying Democrat are unquestionable. However, her conversion from the dark side is not complete.

She wants the Clintons and their flying monkeys out of the way, for sure. But her reason for that is they are in the way of live and potentially relevant Democrats, not that they are corrupt examples of the worst kind of public officials.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, now up FR, "News Unfit to Print."

38 posted on 05/15/2003 8:41:04 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
If the issue is ethics, no one has less than Sidney Blumenthal. He used to call me during the Dukakis campaign, which I was running and he was supposed to be covering, to offer covert advice, which if I accepted might result in better coverage.

Repeat after me:

There is no liberal bias,

there is no liberal bias,

there is no...

39 posted on 05/15/2003 8:41:17 AM PDT by cyncooper (The New York Times is not a source for truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; stanz; RaceBannon; Cacique; Clemenza; rmlew; NYC GOP Chick; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ping list.

40 posted on 05/15/2003 8:42:23 AM PDT by nutmeg (USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson