Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get the Clintons Off the Stage
St. Petersburg Times ^ | 5/15/03 | Susan Estrich

Posted on 05/15/2003 8:15:09 AM PDT by shortstop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: familyofman
Your memory's on the fritz. Rush never said that.

He did say that CLINTON would never shut up or budge from the spotlight once he left office, and that sure turned out to be true.
101 posted on 05/15/2003 2:07:38 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
This is hilarious! I especially enjoyed the dissing she gave to Sidney Blumenthal.
102 posted on 05/15/2003 3:50:06 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
To our benefit, the Clintons' will never leave the stage!!
103 posted on 05/15/2003 4:13:50 PM PDT by NewsGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
"If you are elected as President, will you now publicly promise the American people that you will NOT sexually abuse interns in the Oval Office.."

If FNC is hosting the event, it's not entirely out of the realm of possibility that this question will be asked...

if Col. Hunt is the moderator.

That would tickle me to death!;o)

104 posted on 05/15/2003 4:42:22 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Never have so many been so wrong about so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Hillary Clinton will never be elected president. She is the present day version of Teddy Kennedy. She is one of the catalyzing figures in the democrat ranks. While she raises money like a robber baron for herself and other dems, her real gift is raising money for republicans, just like Teddy always has.
Think of it this way, Newt Gingrich has as much chance being elected president as does Hillary. No way, Jose!
105 posted on 05/16/2003 11:02:57 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
The Clintons suck up every bit of the available air.

Kind of reminds you of Clinton's endless speech to the 1988 Democratic National Convention, when the "rising star" of the 'Rat party droned on and on endlessly. To think they nominated him after that performance!

106 posted on 05/16/2003 11:24:19 AM PDT by gridlock (So a horse walks into a bar...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
the democrats are hypnotized by the Clintons and cannot escape their hold

Great line. Klinton lost both houses of Congress, disgraced the office of the presidency, and IMO scandal fatigue was probably a factor in the Dems loss of the White House. Yet in spite of this, they still remain under the Clinton trance. Amazing.

107 posted on 05/16/2003 11:25:20 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
The more Clinton hangs around, the MORE damage he does to the Democrats. It makes sense we still have him involved, I believe, from a strategic perspective.
108 posted on 05/16/2003 11:26:13 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Kim Jong Il had ANOTHER bad underwear day . He found "decapitate" in his English-Korean dictionary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Recent photo of Estrich.

109 posted on 05/16/2003 1:12:22 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (All tags for sale. 0% interest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Hi there Howlin. Wonderful screed from Estrich. It fell on such deaf ears that it vanished without a trace ... well almost. Every time the Clintons appear in public, it reminds me of just how awful it was with them in the WH.

The air that is being sucked up is the hard dollar contributions. Hillary doesn't really need contributions now. "Let them eat my dust!" Besides, there's billions of federal money unaccounted for during Bill's term.
110 posted on 05/16/2003 4:06:57 PM PDT by playball0 (Fortune favors the bold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Wonderful screed from Estrich.

I can even HEAR her saying this, can't you?

The Dem women are enough to turn ME off to politics if I was a Dem......LOL.

111 posted on 05/16/2003 4:34:02 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
"I ask you, what is so brilliant about this man?"

Judging by his results, very little indeed.

Remember, the night Clinton was elected with just less than 43% of the vote he told America that he had a "mandate for change". Reality check--43% is NOT a mandate. This was the core problem of the early Clinton Administration.

Next stop for his "mandate": so-called "gays" in the military, a policy so wildly out of step with both the Armed Forces and America that it cost WJC his honeymoon and all of his goodwill.

A plan to socialize 16% of the economy, drawn up by his (unelected) wife in secret with medical industry insiders.

The Brady Bill and the AWB, with a promise of more gun control to follow.

Breaking his central campaign promise of "a middle class tax cut", and instead substituting the largest tax increase in US history.

The direct result of his "brilliance": an electorial earthquake at the very first opportunity that destroyed a Democratic majotity held for decades in both the House and the Senate.

Brilliast, right. More like stupid is as stupid does.
112 posted on 05/16/2003 7:26:21 PM PDT by the lone wolf (Good Luck, and watch out for stobor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
From Susan Ostrich:

"Bill Clinton is a brilliant man."

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

"This being, so brilliant yet so corrupt, like a dead mackerel by moonlight shines and stinks!"

John Randolph

113 posted on 05/17/2003 11:06:16 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Q. What's big enough to hunt bear with? A. Hillary's legs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
The 2004 candidates need a chance to get some attention, to rise to Clinton's level

They'd have to sink, in order to do that.

114 posted on 05/24/2003 11:18:14 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
FEDS TAKING A LOOK AT HILLARY CLINTON FUNDRAISERS
      Posted by ewing
On 05/25/2003 10:08 AM EDT with 43 comments


115 posted on 05/25/2003 8:29:45 AM PDT by backhoe (The 1990's ? "The Decade of Fraud(s)..."( Oslo, dot-bombs, clintons...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson