Islam and democracy - not an impossible marriage (Book Review)

With the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime, the United States has begun the daunting task of bringing democracy to a nation that has not known freedom.
The consensus among many experts is that the Arab world and democracy are incompatible. Islam, the argument goes, breeds a submissive attitude - not only to Allah but also to political and religious leaders as well - that makes Muslims inherently incapable of participating in the rough-and- tumble world of electoral politics and of respecting the rights of minorities who follow a different religious or cultural path.
In "After Jihad," Noah Feldman, a New York University law professor with a doctorate in Islamic Thought from Oxford, builds a compelling and persuasive case that this consensus is misinformed.

There is a tremendous appetite for democratic reform throughout the Middle East, he claims, and the US can play a leading role in encouraging Muslims to pressure their governments to hand over power.
But this will take a shift in American policy. The US has historically valued stability over the political and religious turmoil that democracy could bring, leading it to support autocratic regimes like Saudi Arabia's. However, in the long run, Feldman says, democratic reforms can only draw the US and Muslim countries closer.

Unlike most academics, Feldman now has the opportunity to put his theories into practice. He was recently named head of the constitutional team with the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance in Iraq. It will be the team's responsibility to oversee and advise on drafting the constitution for a new democratic order.
"The costs of sticking with the autocrats are great," he writes. "Continuing this policy will array the United States and the West against the interests of ordinary Muslims, who will be unlikely to forget what they see as a betrayal of the values of freedoms and self-government that the US and the West represent to them.
Frustrated dreams of self-government will continue to attach themselves, however fleetingly, to any Muslim leader who purports to stand up to the US, even when he is a notorious butcher like Saddam or a marginal extremist like Osama bin Laden."

Feldman's optimism that Islam and democracy are a natural fit is based on his belief that they are both mobile ideas, philosophies that are easily understood in different cultures and carry universal truths, with similar basic elements.
Both Islam and democracy hold that all humans are equal and that we have certain responsibilities to society. At its core, each treats human beings with respect and asks that we treat others the same way.

But Feldman tempers his optimism. The road to Islamic democracy will be bumpy, he warns, and its short-term effects will cause Americans consternation. Democracies need strong civil organizations to survive, and in much of the Muslim world, it's the Islamists who have built those organizations.
They will undoubtedly win power in many Islamic nations, and there's no guarantee that they will seek closer ties with the West or be zealous in protecting the rights of non-Muslim minorities. That said, many of these same Islamists are, in theory, strong proponents of democracy because it's the key to maintaining power and building the trust of their constituents.
Muslim nations that embrace political freedom also won't be the type of democracies that the West is used to, Feldman points out. The separation of church and state, for instance, will likely never come about because Islam concerns itself with issues both public and private, a contrast to liberal democracies that generally limit themselves to public matters.

That said, Feldman is probably right that, despite the risks, actively promoting democracy in the Islamic world is a long-term win for the West. Eventually, the electorate will tire of anti-American and anti-Israeli politics and demand that politicians focus on local issues.
"Because Muslims already believe that America in the abstract stands for freedom and democracy, they will be quick to embrace America not simply as an idea, but as an ally," Feldman writes.
"Muslim anger at the hypocrisy of the United States may be wide, but it is not deep. It is a mistake to think that ordinary Muslims, or even Islamists, are inevitably or unalterably opposed to the US.... Indeed, the very fact that so many Muslims say they are prepared to embrace democracy, a system they associate with the United States and its successes, provides striking evidence that anti-Americanism may be overcome if the U.S. loosens its embrace of rulers who do not respond to the needs or concerns of their people."

If Feldman and his team are successful in helping Iraq during its transition from dictatorship to democracy, this will put immense pressure on Iran's religious leaders, Saudi Arabia's monarchy, and others to begin allowing their citizens to determine their own destinies.

• Steven Martinovich is a freelance writer in Sudbury, Ontario.
Copyright © 2003 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.

Assuming the article is accurate, this is not good; surely we could have found someone more robust to send than this guy!

Unlike most academics, Feldman now has the opportunity to put his theories into practice. He was recently named head of the constitutional team with the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance in Iraq. It will be the team's responsibility to oversee and advise on drafting the constitution for a new democratic order.

The word "constitution" appears twice in the paragraph above, but Mr. Feldman seems to think that giving the Iraqis "democracy" is more important than framing a durable system of checks and balances.

But Feldman tempers his optimism. ... Democracies need strong civil organizations to survive, and in much of the Muslim world, it's the Islamists who have built those organizations.

True, and a big problem. How does Feldman deal with it?

They will undoubtedly win power in many Islamic nations, and there's no guarantee that they will seek closer ties with the West or be zealous in protecting the rights of non-Muslim minorities. That said, many of these same Islamists are, in theory, strong proponents of democracy because it's the key to maintaining power and building the trust of their constituents.

I like that "in theory". Come on, we all know that once you vote Islamists into power, they never voluntarily relinquish it! (See Iran.) But it gets worse:

Muslim nations that embrace political freedom also won't be the type of democracies that the West is used to, Feldman points out. The separation of church and state, for instance, will likely never come about because Islam concerns itself with issues both public and private, a contrast to liberal democracies that generally limit themselves to public matters.

That is called giving up before you've even thrown a single pitch. What a mealy-mouthed wuss! We want to break the back of Islam as a political ideology (not Islam as a religion), and to do so with minimal bloodshed before it's too late. Otherwise we might as well have stayed home and not have bothered to get involved.

Separation of mosque and state has to be a non-negotiable proposition, because it is the only bulwark holding back the Islamists from establishing theocratic dictatorships. There is no other way. Turkey showed how to do it nearly a century ago. We should not even be discussing this.

Eventually, the electorate will tire of anti-American and anti-Israeli politics and demand that politicians focus on local issues.

Yes, eventually they will -- but not automatically. Unless we go in forcefully and make it clear their constitution has to be drafted along Western lines, i.e., separation of powers, rule of law, limitations on the power of government, protection of property, human rights for all. Islam is acceptable insofar as it does not conflict with these bedrock principles.

Mr. Feldman, it appears you are the wrong guy for the job.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.