Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frustrated, US Arms Teams to Leave Iraq
Washington Post ^ | 5/11/2003 | Barton Gellman

Posted on 05/11/2003 4:54:10 AM PDT by joesbucks

washingtonpost.com

Frustrated, U.S. Arms Team to Leave Iraq

Task Force Unable To Find Any Weapons

By Barton Gellman Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, May 11, 2003; Page A01

BAGHDAD -- The group directing all known U.S. search efforts for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is winding down operations without finding proof that President Saddam Hussein kept clandestine stocks of outlawed arms, according to participants.

The 75th Exploitation Task Force, as the group is formally known, has been described from the start as the principal component of the U.S. plan to discover and display forbidden Iraqi weapons. The group's departure, expected next month, marks a milestone in frustration for a major declared objective of the war.

Leaders of Task Force 75's diverse staff -- biologists, chemists, arms treaty enforcers, nuclear operators, computer and document experts, and special forces troops -- arrived with high hopes of early success. They said they expected to find what Secretary of State Colin L. Powell described at the U.N. Security Council on Feb. 5 -- hundreds of tons of biological and chemical agents, missiles and rockets to deliver the agents, and evidence of an ongoing program to build a nuclear bomb.

Scores of fruitless missions broke that confidence, many task force members said in interviews.

The rest you'll have to click on the link.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 75thetf; camelsbutt; nothingthere; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2003 4:54:10 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Shhhhh! Maybe nobody will notice. This is just proof at how successful our bombing campaign was.
2 posted on 05/11/2003 5:14:46 AM PDT by Gore_ War_ Vet (Invading Iraq and taking over the world is NOT conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
Now there's an explanation I haven't heard. We bombed the evidence from existance.

I hope the WH communications office don't see our missive. It gives them the answer to what I believe over time will be a very sticky question.

3 posted on 05/11/2003 5:23:11 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
at=of doh!
4 posted on 05/11/2003 5:23:18 AM PDT by Gore_ War_ Vet (Invading Iraq and taking over the world is NOT conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
$100,000,000,000+, 10's of thousands of Iraqi lives, hundreds of our troops, to find out I've got more WMD's under my kitchen sink than Sadam had.

5 posted on 05/11/2003 5:30:25 AM PDT by Gore_ War_ Vet (Invading Iraq and taking over the world is NOT conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
They should go to Syria, there they will find wrapped in a blanket all the evidence
you need.
6 posted on 05/11/2003 6:07:05 AM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
Not to worry, some cockamimie story will be enough to put the public back to sleep. How about, "The devil made me do it"?. Or, "Barney ate the intelligence report on the way to the office".
7 posted on 05/11/2003 6:09:31 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
It doesn't make sense....if Saddam had no WMD, why wouldn't he just prove that to the inspectors rather than risk everything? Why the extended game of cat and mouse if there was nothing to hide? I don't get it.....
8 posted on 05/11/2003 6:11:43 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Where the heck am I?

I thought I was on FR. but it looks like I stumbled into DU by mistake.

OK, there's my ride. See ya.
9 posted on 05/11/2003 6:13:43 AM PDT by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBprone
Little things like standards of proof should never get in the way of blind obeddience?
10 posted on 05/11/2003 6:18:46 AM PDT by gabby hayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
Um, you totally missed the point. Saddam was REQUIRED to PROVE he had destroyed these. He did not. Thus, in the absence of proof of destruction, we had to ACT as though they existed. All this means is that we were 100% successful in PROVING that he does not (and will never) have them.

Now, shall we talk abou the Al-Quaeda links---which to me were the far more important reason to take out this regime?

11 posted on 05/11/2003 6:19:08 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: meenie
The public has never been asleep. It has known since that "minor" event called 9/11 that we have ENEMIES, they are REAL, and we need to obliterate everyone who is involved in supporting or sheltering terrorists. Saddam qualified, big time. He should have been on the hit list even without the threat of WMDs. Thankfully, the public knows this, although the Dems still haven't figured it out.

Which will be very good for 2004.

12 posted on 05/11/2003 6:21:11 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
10's of thousands of Iraqi lives

Where did you get that figure? We weren't responsible for the deaths of 10's of thousands of Iraqis.

13 posted on 05/11/2003 6:27:58 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Odd, looks like they found another mobile bioweapons lab yesterday.
14 posted on 05/11/2003 6:28:48 AM PDT by Amelia (#8!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: tsmith130
It doesn't make sense....if Saddam had no WMD, why wouldn't he just prove that to the inspectors rather than risk everything?

Maybe because Saddam understood that it is not possible to prove a negative. The weapons can always be somewhere else, as we have seen. So he scraped together a couple of billion, shaved off his moustache, and went to live with the ex-Nazis in South America.

16 posted on 05/11/2003 6:49:10 AM PDT by Seti 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
Though I don't agree with you, glad to see you're still posting. ;>)
17 posted on 05/11/2003 7:07:06 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine's brother (MrConfettiman was in the streets while I was still yelling at the TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Third-and-nine, Bush is in the shotgun. Tommy Franks on the outside.

The Arms Team goes in motion. Democrats shift into a blitz...


18 posted on 05/11/2003 7:17:09 AM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
Though I don't agree with you, glad to see you're still posting.

...and I you. If you end up in the same place, does it really matter who you followed to get there?

We're not that far apart, you and I. #;o)

19 posted on 05/11/2003 7:19:54 AM PDT by Gore_ War_ Vet (Invading Iraq and taking over the world is NOT conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Saddam was the weapon of mass destruction. Mission accomplished!
20 posted on 05/11/2003 7:33:50 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson