Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
Um, you totally missed the point. Saddam was REQUIRED to PROVE he had destroyed these. He did not. Thus, in the absence of proof of destruction, we had to ACT as though they existed. All this means is that we were 100% successful in PROVING that he does not (and will never) have them.

Now, shall we talk abou the Al-Quaeda links---which to me were the far more important reason to take out this regime?

11 posted on 05/11/2003 6:19:08 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: LS
Um, you totally missed the point. Saddam was REQUIRED to PROVE he had destroyed these. He did not.

Yep.

23 posted on 05/11/2003 8:21:48 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson