Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/08/2003 9:31:41 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2 posted on 05/08/2003 9:32:11 AM PDT by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Canada: We can be involved -- or irrelevant

Unfortunately it'll probably be the latter.

3 posted on 05/08/2003 9:45:33 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
And, finally, the United States is paying the bills for NMD, not Canada,

That's too bad.  Having a seat at the NMD table should require
sharing in the cost of its development and implementation.  For
Canada to have no financial responsibilities increases the likelihood
of there being 'difficulties' with them.  Plus, the Liberals look to be
in power for a long time.  Sharing NMD technology with Chretien
and his ilk is a horrible idea.
4 posted on 05/08/2003 9:47:49 AM PDT by gcruse (Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
What's changed?

Well, mostly what happened was that a clutch of gibbering lunatics who can't grow rice have decided to play with long-range missiles and nuclear bombs, and Canada's on the flightpath.

On a related topic, can you believe that dumb old paranoid warmonger Reagan? "Star Wars" will never work and anyway we'll never need it...sure wish I'd saved some of those old know-it-all editorials...

5 posted on 05/08/2003 9:49:10 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Canada is uninvolved -- and irrelevant!
6 posted on 05/08/2003 9:50:41 AM PDT by 2timothy3.16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
This is like the Turkey vote to allow US troops enter for the attack on Iraq. It's going to happen anyways and if they refuse to join they are going to miss an opportunity of a lifetime.

I have no problems with the US paying all the bills. That means we are firmly in the driver's seat of the entire project and can dictate terms.

7 posted on 05/08/2003 9:53:01 AM PDT by rudypoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
A real leader doesn't follow public opinion, he creates it. He generates it by making his case and then forging ahead.

His opponents, at some point, must simply salute the flag and fall into line, or find themselves irrelevantly talking to themselves. This is what is happening with Canada. The same thing is happening on a host of other issues where Bush has taken a position which was initially widely opposed, and in the end becomes reality. The Russians grit their teeth and support the end of the Anti-Missile Defense treaty. The Euros send troops to support Bush's wars. Eventually they will even stop mumbling about the Kyoto Treaty that even they won't sign, but never had the nerve to reject publicly as Bush has done.

Chirac is calling Bush trying to bury the hatchett, and no doubt worrying about what ledger entries the intel boys are going to find in Baghdad with his name on them. The Germans will fall in line under Polish command, or be side-lined completely. You have to admit, it is delicious.

For the President being such a moron, it is interesting how again and again his enemies dance like marrionettes on Bush's string.
9 posted on 05/08/2003 9:58:14 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
"Canada: We can be involved -- or irrelevant"

Too late!

What a shame that the nation we so respected for their courage in the Iran hostage crisis is now just a meaningless bother.
11 posted on 05/08/2003 10:03:43 AM PDT by yeetch!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
I don't think the United States should be sharing missile defense technology with Canada. We have working prototypes, what does Canada bring to the table that benefits the US?

It's unnecessary for Canada too; the French will protect Canada. They are the best of allies.
14 posted on 05/08/2003 10:14:29 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
There are, evidently, people in Canada who love their nation and are concerned about what's best for Canada instead of what pleases the socialists in Europe and the thugs in the U.N.
15 posted on 05/08/2003 10:17:38 AM PDT by WaterDragon (Only America has the moral authority and the resolve to lead the world in the 21st Century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Well, well, well...

BTTT!

23 posted on 05/08/2003 11:11:12 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Never have so many been so wrong about so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson