Skip to comments.
Sheriff's task force to search cars in Milwaukee for guns
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ^
| 7 May 03
| Reid J. Epstein
Posted on 05/07/2003 5:51:01 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-185 next last
Clarke is a hero. The people of Milwaukee's central city are prisoners in their own homes, and Art Jones has done nothing about it except level charges of racism at anybody who asks him to do something about it.
In an appearance on Charlie Sykes' show on WTMJ this morning, Clarke responded to the Chief's assertion that crime is down by reading a list of all the shootings in Milwaukee in the last two weeks.
It took him several minutes.
The next time the NAACP opens their mouths about gun violence, they should be asked about Art Jones and David Clarke.
To: *bang_list; *Privacy_list
To: Mr. Silverback
"...everyone can support reducing the number of illegal guns on city streets." I don't.
"Illegal guns" do not kill or harm fellow citizens.
Fellow citizens kill or harm fellow citizens.
Also, since the 14th amendment secured jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution within the boundaries of a state, Amendment II, makes it clear there can be no such thing as an "illegal gun(s)."
3
posted on
05/07/2003 6:03:05 PM PDT
by
tahiti
To: Libertarianize the GOP
Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. announced Tuesday he has established a gun crime task force that will rely on so-called consent searches of cars in the city, a practice that has been restricted among Milwaukee police
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This "consent search" to entrap citizens is outragous.
Every Wisconsin citizen should be up in arms over this invasion of privicy.
Wake up America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
4
posted on
05/07/2003 6:04:59 PM PDT
by
CHICAGOFARMER
(Citizen Carry)
To: Mr. Silverback
In an appearance on Charlie Sykes' show on WTMJ this morning, Clarke responded to the Chief's assertion that crime is down by reading a list of all the shootings in Milwaukee in the last two weeks.
It took him several minutes.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would suspect that you believe in the Darwin theory survival of the strongest. Just do not disarm the honest american citizens so they can bring a gun to a gun fight.
5
posted on
05/07/2003 6:07:27 PM PDT
by
CHICAGOFARMER
(Citizen Carry)
To: Mr. Silverback
In other words, the officer asks, "will you give me consent to search your car, or should I arrest you on trumped-up driving charges and use that as an excuse to search your car?"
6
posted on
05/07/2003 6:08:59 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: Mr. Silverback
If you don't give your consent, they can't proceed with a consent search.
Follow up question: is refusal to give consent to search probable cause for a search warrant?
7
posted on
05/07/2003 6:11:07 PM PDT
by
JimRed
(Disinformation is the leftist's and enemy's friend; consider the source before believing.)
To: Mr. Silverback
For those outside of Milwaukee, Clarke is the new conservative Afro-American Sheriff of Milwaukee County who managed to escape the Milwaukee PD as a former Captain. Clarke is a dedicated serious and effective career law enforcement offical.
MPD Chief Arthur Jones is a clueless race-baiting buffon who dismantled the gang crimes unit, called off drug raids in progress and banned police leather jackets as being too confrontaional to the populace.
Mayor Johnny "The "Zero" Norquist had to settle out of court after banging a City Hall employee while his enviro-whacko wife beamed support and even had another child with him after the scandal.
Gangs of youths "wilding" attacked people leaving the popular "Summerfest" as MPD stood inside the festival and refused to intervene due to orders from Jones.
A sixteen-year old gang banger makes a yuppie mom kneel down and then shoots her (fatally) in the face with a twelve gauge. While the mother's young daughter watches.
Chief Arthur Jones cites a reduction in violence (using flawed FBI statistics) in Milwaukee and will sue the city on racial grounds if he is not awarded a new contract.
Welcome to the Great Place On a Great Lake! (not!)
8
posted on
05/07/2003 6:13:01 PM PDT
by
Milwaukee_Guy
(Having France in NATO, is like taking an accordion deer hunting.......)
To: JimRed
is refusal to give consent to search probable cause for a search warrant? No...but they now bring(or threaten to bring) canine units to the scene to let them snif around your vehicle. If one of the dogs "alerts" the police will proceed to search on "probable cause". The handler determines what an "alert" is.
9
posted on
05/07/2003 6:18:28 PM PDT
by
KDD
To: xm177e2
In other words, the officer asks, "will you give me consent to search your car, or should I arrest you on trumped-up driving charges and use that as an excuse to search your car?" I would like to see a law passed requiring police officers to record indeliby, before seeking consent for any search, the nature of the search, the probable cause justifying such a search, and all outstanding issues to be cited. The intended target of the search should be informed of all of these. Cooperation with a search should not allow any cited charges to be dropped, nor should an officer be able to add charges if a search is refused, unless the officer can make a reasonable case that he had no way of knowing about the to-be-cited conduct prior to the search request.
10
posted on
05/07/2003 6:18:52 PM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: JimRed
Follow up question: is refusal to give consent to search probable cause for a search warrant? Not only that, but if you were clocked going 56 in a 55 zone, it guarantees you a speeding ticket.
11
posted on
05/07/2003 6:19:48 PM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: JimRed
"Follow up question: is refusal to give consent to search probable cause for a search warrant?"
I saw on that stupid Sheriff John Bonnel Wildest Police Chase video show where a trooper asked a motorist if he had any guns, bombs or nuclear devices in the motorists car.
The motorist laughed at the Sheriffs suggestion and Bonnel solemnly declared on the air that BECAUSE THE MOTORIST LAUGHED HE MUST HAVE BEEN UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE OFFICER'S SUGGESTION and therefor THAT WAS ALL THE PROBABLE CAUSE NEEDED TO DO A WARRANTLESS SEACH.
Right on national television and who really cares until it happens to them!
12
posted on
05/07/2003 6:20:44 PM PDT
by
Milwaukee_Guy
(Having France in NATO, is like taking an accordion deer hunting.......)
To: Mr. Silverback
everyone can support reducing the number of illegal guns on city streets. "It really doesn't make a difference who's doing it," he said. "If the sheriff has the kind of resources in his department, and the backing of Scott Walker and the County Board to do it, that's great."And so it begins...
13
posted on
05/07/2003 7:20:15 PM PDT
by
metalurgist
(Never underestimate the power of a large group of stupid people....... U S Congress's real motto)
To: metalurgist
i guess that now even a mindless traffic violation will have to be met with "i am pleading the fifth amendment and refuse to answer anything on the grounds it will incriminate me"
book him dan-o
jmt teeman
ps- can one refuse to be fingerprinted for the same reason...
14
posted on
05/07/2003 7:30:09 PM PDT
by
teeman8r
To: Travis McGee
and wear special black uniforms, rather than the standard brown. From Brownshirts to Blackshirts. That's a nice touch. Somehow I don't get the feeling they will be attending that class to learn about the Constitution as much as they will be learning how to get around it without scraping too much ink off of the old document.
To: Mr. Silverback
How many times does this need to be repeated:
NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, EVER consent to vehicular searches.
If they've got probable cause, they'll search your vehicle without your consent. If they don't, they'll ask as part of a fishing expedition. No good thing can ever come from a consented vehicular search. They'll never find anything to give you a medal for, but it doesn't take much to put you away.
16
posted on
05/07/2003 7:47:47 PM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: JimRed
of course it is.. thats the catch (catch-22 of course)
17
posted on
05/07/2003 7:55:09 PM PDT
by
wafflehouse
(the hell you say!)
To: Mr. Silverback
(I see all the usual knee-jerk syspects have already responded.)
I had no idea that Milwaukee had degenerated so. I hope this new policy can defuse the situation enough to let some 'rationality' back into the city ...
18
posted on
05/07/2003 8:01:30 PM PDT
by
_Jim
(Guangdong doctor linked as source of SARS in China: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
To: KDD
That K-9 trick only works if the dogs on within about 10 minutes. The old "Am I free to go or have you placed me under arrest?" question tends to make them nervous.
If they hold you and then bring a dog unit, it is unlawful arrest. File suit.
To: Mr. Silverback
and wear special black uniforms, rather than the standard brown. WTF????
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-185 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson