Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran denies nukes, refuses inspectors
The Australian ^ | May 08, 2003

Posted on 05/07/2003 9:37:28 AM PDT by ellery

A TOP Iranian official denied his country had a nuclear weapons program but told the UN that Iran was not willing to submit to tougher inspections of its facilities.

The US has accused Iran, which is building a centrifuge plant at Natanz in its south, of having secret plans to make nuclear weapons. It fears Iran could enrich weapons-grade uranium at the site.

But according to a diplomat who attended the meeting, Iran's atomic energy chief, Gholamreza Aghazadeh, told the International Atomic Energy Agency yesterday that Iran's nuclear program was "only for peaceful purposes".

Mr Aghazadeh told the UN's nuclear watchdog at the closed-door meeting that Iran needed the facilities to make nuclear fuel, the diplomat said.

Iranian officials have said they have nothing to hide as their nuclear program is only meant to generate electricity.

But in Washington, US State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said the evidence collected by the IAEA, and even Iranian statements, pointed to a weapons program.

"Despite their protests, despite their claims, Iran is developing a full-scale nuclear program that it would not behove anybody to co-operate with," Mr Boucher said.

"And so we will keep making the case. We will keep making the point with the information that is available, and I would say increasingly available, that Iran's nuclear ambitions are much bigger than many had hoped."

In Moscow, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Losyukov said there was no evidence that Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons.

"Very sound evidence is needed to accuse anyone. So far, neither the US nor any other countries can present it," Mr Losyukov said.

He acknowledged Iran's nuclear program had some uncertainties, and that Moscow would work with Tehran to "add more transparency" to its program. As for Russian-Iranian nuclear co-operation, Mr Losyukov said the work was "strictly in line with IAEA norms".

Russia's nuclear co-operation with Iran has long been a contentious issue between Washington and Moscow.

The US claims that the technology and expertise Iran is gaining from Russia's construction of the $US800 million ($1.25 billion) Bushehr nuclear power plant could be used for a weapons program, and that Russian companies – perhaps without official permission – have transferred weapons technology to Tehran.

Mr Aghazadeh also faced "tough questioning" from the representatives of 10 countries, including the US, Britain, Japan, Canada, The Netherlands and France, the diplomat said.

The main controversy centred on the UN agency's request that Iran agree to more intrusive inspections. Washington has also urged Iran to agree to the tougher regime. However, Mr Aghazadeh reportedly said it would "depend on conditions . . ."

"It was very conditional," the diplomat said. The head of the IAEA visited Iranian nuclear sites in February and is due to report to the agency's board in June.

Washington claims Iran has tested nuclear material without declaring it to the UN agency, and is pushing the agency to declare Iran in non-compliance with its safeguards agreement.

IAEA spokeswoman Melissa Fleming said that "inspections and analysis" of Iran's nuclear sites were still under way, and the report to be delivered in June was not yet ready.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iaea; iran; nukes; southasia; southasialist; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 05/07/2003 9:37:29 AM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eala; freedom44
Ping
2 posted on 05/07/2003 9:37:48 AM PDT by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Methinks this sounds familiar...
3 posted on 05/07/2003 9:40:11 AM PDT by TheBigB ("Daddy, what's -b*tch-?" "It's a grown-up word, honey. It means junior Senator from New York")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Amazing.

Iraq says "We have no weapons, and we could prove it (of course) but we just refuse to do so." The US thinks about this and then ... Iraq gets invaded, devastated, and the existing regime is hunted down like dogs.

Iran says "We have no weapons, and we could prove it (of course) but we just refuse to do so." The US thinks about this and then ...

4 posted on 05/07/2003 9:46:28 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ellery
$US800 million ($1.25 billion)

So that's how much Austrialian money is to the US dollar. I wonder how much Candian money is worth?

5 posted on 05/07/2003 10:01:55 AM PDT by RepPhil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *southasia_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
6 posted on 05/07/2003 10:06:24 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Iran denies nukes, refuses inspectors

Oh, *THAT'S* smart, what with our entire army like, 50 miles away.

7 posted on 05/07/2003 10:07:56 AM PDT by Lazamataz (c) Entertaining beautiful women since 1972 ! :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RepPhil
About 1/2 of U.S. $ last I heard.
8 posted on 05/07/2003 10:12:49 AM PDT by ChefKeith (NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ellery
"The US has accused Iran, which is building a centrifuge plant at Natanz in its south, of having secret plans to make nuclear weapons."

More likely that the U.S. has accused Iran of being in the way of the pipeline to the Siberian oilfields.
9 posted on 05/07/2003 10:13:06 AM PDT by thetruckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Hello Ragheads! We are the 101st Airborne and ALL YOUR SANDS BELONG TO US...
10 posted on 05/07/2003 10:15:07 AM PDT by ChefKeith (NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Sounds like another job for the Israeli Air Force.
11 posted on 05/07/2003 10:23:07 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I'm sure that Iran is prepared for *that*. You can only get away with such a raid once; Iran would lob some chemical-filled Shehabs at Israel without any hesitation - they probably already have them aimed. Well, assuming they can get them there, they've had some trouble with home-built engines exploding on the pad or in the air ;) At least they're better than Iraq's old al-Hussayns.

Plus, this is just a centrifuge plant, not a foreign-built reactor with foreign-imported fuel as in the case of Iraq. If Iran can build the centrifuges on their own, which evidence points to, they'll just build a new enrichment plant. All an Israeli strike would do is start a war.
12 posted on 05/07/2003 11:12:56 AM PDT by AmericanAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanAge
Perhaps you're right. But it would be a short war and I think I can pick the winner from here in Missouri.
13 posted on 05/07/2003 12:09:14 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ellery
We just found out who is next on the list. File this under the to stupid to learn heading. LOL
14 posted on 05/07/2003 1:13:16 PM PDT by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ellery
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that Iran is working on a nuclear weapon. Sitting on huge reserves of oil and natural gas, the construction of a nuclear power plant to generate electricity makes no sense at all.
15 posted on 05/07/2003 1:42:42 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ellery
A TOP Iranian official denied his country had a nuclear weapons program but told the UN that Iran was not willing to submit to tougher inspections of its facilities.

Famous last words...

16 posted on 05/07/2003 1:45:26 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
NOTHING TO HIDE? NOTHING TO FEAR!
17 posted on 05/07/2003 1:57:39 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Yeah, that's not a hard call. I'd love to see the casino odds on that one ;) I wonder how many zeros would be in the "1,000...(etc) to 1" odds?
18 posted on 05/07/2003 2:45:14 PM PDT by AmericanAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
But Blix is looking for a job. Surely this fits with the UN
19 posted on 05/07/2003 5:45:14 PM PDT by AMNZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ellery
'Peaceful purposes' include lobbing a nuke at Israel no doubt. Methinks it is time for Israel to take out a nuke facility.
20 posted on 05/07/2003 6:03:25 PM PDT by ex-Texan (primates capitulards toujours en quete de fromage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson