Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Benjamin undeterred by incumbent competition
The Hill ^ | 5/6/03 | Peter Savodnik

Posted on 05/06/2003 12:37:27 PM PDT by LdSentinal

Michael Benjamin has all the makings of a first-rate Senate candidate.

The New York Republican is sharp, aggressive and perfectly at home talking tax cuts, welfare reform or judicial nominees. He speaks Spanish (good for reaching out to Latinos), he's spent years combating domestic violence (should help with women), and he says the voters he's met like him.

The only obstacle facing the 33-year-old Wall Street equities trader is his opponent, Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer.

With $15 million in the bank and Democrats far outnumbering Republicans in the Empire State, Schumer should be nearly impossible to beat -- as GOP Rep. Peter King’s decision last month not to seek the seat indicates.

What's more, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, pinning its hopes for picking up two or three seats on the South, is unlikely to spend much on a race it hardly hopes to win.

None of that seems to have deterred Benjamin, who ran unsuccessfully against Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y) in 1996 and calls himself a "center-right Republican," closer to George W. Bush than to ex-New York Sen. Jacob Javits.

"I believe that on many issues I represent more of the mainstream and that Senator Schumer represents an insane and irrational position on many important issues such as welfare reform, campaign finance, taxes, abortion, Second Amendment rights -- you name it," Benjamin said in a recent interview.

"I've traveled to most counties in New York, and I am warmly received in the places I go. I think people are viewing me as a breath of fresh air."

That may be true, but for now Benjamin will have a tough time getting his message out: In the first quarter of 2003, his campaign raised less than $5,000. Benjamin said that since the beginning of April his campaign has raised "in the low six figures."

He also pointed out that Republicans can win statewide in New York -- witness Gov. George Pataki, Javits, and former Sen. Al D'Amato, whom Schumer beat in 1998. (D'Amato spent more than $24 million on the race.)

Plus, said Benjamin, he brings rich "life experiences" to the table that will help him overcome any Republican primary foes -- so far, there are none -- and, possibly, Schumer.

Benjamin, a 1992 graduate of New York University, said that he grew up spending summers and winters in Queens and the rest of the year somewhere in Latin America -- Mexico, Peru, Columbia, Ecuador and elsewhere, where his father worked for Bank of America.

He said that since Sept. 11, 2001, voters in New York and across the country expect leaders to be bolder when it comes to national security.

"I don't think there's anything wrong with, you know, observing the fact that September 11 has changed the political landscape," said Benjamin, who recalled emerging from the Fulton Street subway station, a few blocks from where the World Trade Center once stood, just after the second plane hit.

"I believe this post-9-11 world basically represents an entirely new era," he said. "Whereas America kind of felt we could rely on the security of two vast oceans and our allies to ensure our safety, I don't think we can afford that anymore. We have to be on guard against terrorists, tyrants."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2004; house; michaelbenjamin; nadler; newyork; schumner; senate

1 posted on 05/06/2003 12:37:27 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Ah, but does he have Janeane Garofalo on his side? Because, as we saw with the whole Iraq crisis, you can't do anything without the support of Garofalo.
2 posted on 05/06/2003 12:41:16 PM PDT by AmericanAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Forget New York, we'll never win it.

There are FAR better opportunities in Fla, NV, SD, etc etc than to waste money on New York.
3 posted on 05/06/2003 12:50:21 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: LdSentinal
New York can be a long shot unless Rudy runs (Probably wont). I know of another big opportunity if the Republicans can field a good candidate. Barbara Boxer of California is ripe for the plucking.
5 posted on 05/06/2003 1:11:43 PM PDT by hresources
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
"I think this guy could create a shock upset."

I wish he could do it but I don't think he can.

Don't misunderstand, I would LOVE to unseat Up-Chuck just like anyone else, I just don't see happening however.

Btw is Benjamin rich enough to self-finance his campaign?
6 posted on 05/06/2003 1:14:19 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
No, he's not anywhere near self-financing, and he would be a terrible longshot to win. No worse than Peter King, though, or anyone else besides Rudy or Pataki, and at least with Benjamin you have an honest-to-goodness conservative who can atriculate Republican policies.

He would have two big legs up in 2004: the GOP convention and Bush's attempt to win NY. Plenty of free media and prime time coverage from that to make up for what will be a huge fundraising disadvantage for any nominee.

If he can show the GOP in a positive, conservative light that can only help Bush in NY.

7 posted on 05/06/2003 1:42:53 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (That's my theory and I'm sticking to it! At least for the present . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
"He would have two big legs up in 2004: the GOP convention and Bush's attempt to win NY. Plenty of free media and prime time coverage from that to make up for what will be a huge fundraising disadvantage for any nominee."

Well let him run, but if I'm running the RNC there is no way I spend money on New York when there are much better opportunities in Wisconson, New Mexico, Iowa, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.
8 posted on 05/06/2003 2:04:48 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
In terms of winning the states for Dubya, Not Senate races
9 posted on 05/06/2003 2:05:23 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
I think it'll be a wait-and-see-what-the-polls-say kind of thing. Dubya's going to have a lot more resources than the Democrat (unless it's Kerry, 'cause you know whatever he claims now he'll be spending when it's time) and will be in a good position to make an evaluation at/after the convention in NYC on whether more time/money in NY is worth it, etc.
10 posted on 05/06/2003 2:10:06 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (That's my theory and I'm sticking to it! At least for the present . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
=smacking forehead=
11 posted on 05/06/2003 4:14:41 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson