Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The real battle ahead - United States versus United Nations
WND ^ | May 3, 2003 | Henry Lamb

Posted on 05/05/2003 3:52:50 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Now that the smoke is clearing from the skies over Baghdad, the real work begins – helping the people form a government and preventing the United Nations from ruining it. Both tasks are extremely difficult. Success or failure will have profound influence on several generations.

Most Iraqis, but not all, simply want to get on with their lives, without the fear of government throwing them into prison, or worse, at the whim of their leaders. A significant number of religious leaders want to control the government precisely so they can throw into prison, or worse, those who fail to conform to Islamic law. There are also ethnic, economic and political divisions among the newly-freed people. Bringing these divergent forces together into a government is a Herculean task. It is a task for the United States, not for the United Nations.

The U.N. suffered a major blow when the United States, along with 65 other nations, undertook the task of removing Saddam Hussein over the objections of the U.N., France, Russia, Germany and the international professional protesters. The U.N. is now, perhaps, in a life-or-death struggle, trying to regain its legitimacy by inserting itself into the reconstruction of Iraq. It cannot do so without the acquiescence of the United States.

In Congress, and across the nation, there are voices urging the president to involve the U.N., to "mend fences" and to make gestures to smooth the ruffled tail-feathers of our former allies. The president should resist this pressure and leave the U.N. twiddling its thumbs.

The world witnessed the utter ineffectiveness of the U.N. when it watched the Security Council argue for 12 years about Saddam Hussein. Now, we are discovering why the French and Russians didn't want military action that would upset their financial arrangements with the dictator. We are discovering why Kofi Annan didn't want to disturb the enormously profitable "oil for food" program that he ran with virtually no external accountability.

Were there no other reason to abandon the U.N., this episode with Iraq would be ample justification. But there's more. Much, much more.

There are nearly 130 agencies and organizations operating within the U.N. system, each oversees programs that require vast sums of money and massive bureaucracies. These programs are all strategic components of the plan to achieve global governance, as described in "Our Global Neighborhood," the report of the Commission on Global Governance. These programs operate outside the spotlight of international media. There is little doubt that they all stink with a foul smell so rank that it would make Kofi's "oil for food" irregularities smell like roses.

The Framework Convention on Climate Change is but one of these 130 U.N. agencies. The back-scratching between U.N. officials and environmental organizations is so far beyond disgusting that it could approach criminal – if anyone were looking. We tracked five environmental organizations that were listed as "executing agency" or "collaborating organization" for two years on grants totaling $792,705,000, in 1998, and more than $800 million in 1999. The grants came from the U.N.'s Global Environment Facility. If you have a strong stomach, examine some of the projects funded, in part, by your money.

The U.N. bureaucracy is so far removed from accountability that few Americans have any idea at all what the massive institution is doing, let alone how effectively or efficiently it is operating. Congress has little knowledge of, or interest in, these far-flung wealth centers. Now is the ideal time to wean the U.N. from our treasury.

If the U.N. is allowed to stick its nose into Iraq, the old buddy-system will flourish. To be a buddy of the U.N., do what the U.N. wants done, and the U.N. will throw a little money your way. Sound familiar? Who gets the goodies in socialist societies, or in societies run by dictators? Of course, it's the people who do what the government says to do.

The U.N. may be a more benevolent dictator than was Saddam – less violent, perhaps, but no less corrupt. The U.S. has an opportunity to help the Iraqi people discover representative self-governance. With the help of Iraqi nationals, and other enlightened and courageous individuals, the Iraqi people can say "no" to the religious fundamentalists and to the U.N.

With help from the U.S., Iraq can become a beacon of freedom for the entire region. The United Nations cannot withstand this powerful light.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; iraq; jbs; nwo; oneworldorder; un; unitednations; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2003 3:52:50 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: madfly
ping
2 posted on 05/05/2003 4:06:25 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *UN_List; Ernest_at_the_Beach
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
3 posted on 05/05/2003 4:07:15 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP; Tailgunner Joe; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; ...
Thanks!

The UN has got to be reduced and killed over time!

Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



4 posted on 05/05/2003 5:07:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I think it should be disbanded all at once. The problem is that the US Senate, the House and the Administration, like so many before, like to talk tough and then - go ahead and re-up our UN "dues" to the tune of billions. Politicans don't have the guts to tell the truth and to act on that truth.
5 posted on 05/05/2003 5:19:22 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

What battle?

US kicks the UN out and gives it no more money. UN fold and US wins.

Don't need to be President or a General in that war to figure it out.
6 posted on 05/05/2003 5:24:25 PM PDT by xusafflyer (May 31st - I escape the Kommunism known as Kalifornia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Coalition of the free vs. the collection of collectivists. It's time to part company with parasites, extortionists and enablers. Like terrorists...they are anti-freedom. Throughout human history there has been only one beacon of FREEDOM. Never in the course of human existence have so many individuals been FREE. Never in the course of human existence have so many individuals from other nations been FREED by one nation. The true meaning of this nation's creed mirrors the greatness of life itself.
7 posted on 05/05/2003 9:01:28 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; Ernest_at_the_Beach; madfly; *"NWO"
There are nearly 130 agencies and organizations operating within the U.N. system, each oversees programs that require vast sums of money and massive bureaucracies......... as described in "Our Global Neighborhood," the report of the Commission on Global Governance. These programs operate outside the spotlight of international media. There is little doubt that they all stink with a foul smell so rank that it would make Kofi's "oil for food" irregularities smell like roses.
The Framework Convention on Climate Change is but one of these 130 U.N. agencies............ it could approach criminal – if anyone were looking. We tracked five environmental organizations that were listed as "executing agency" or "collaborating organization" for two years on grants totaling $792,705,000, in 1998, and more than $800 million in 1999.

===========================
Guys, Just "five environmental" organizations recieved the bulk of U.S. of A. "contributions" to the U.N. in '97 and '98 {IF our "contributions" are still in the area of $1 billion per year}. RICO corruption on a global scale. Peace and love, George.
8 posted on 05/06/2003 6:53:39 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; ATOMIC_PUNK; backhoe; Libertarianize the GOP; Carry_Okie; 2sheep; 4Freedom; ...
ping
9 posted on 05/06/2003 5:13:56 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks.
10 posted on 05/06/2003 6:12:24 PM PDT by sistergoldenhair (Don't be a sheep. People hate sheep. They eat sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: madfly


11 posted on 05/06/2003 6:55:37 PM PDT by Joe Brower (http://www.joebrower.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The U.N. suffered a major blow when the United States, along with 65 other nations, undertook the task of removing Saddam Hussein over the objections of the U.N., France, Russia, Germany and the international professional protesters.

That's a fine way of referring to the peace pukes.

12 posted on 05/07/2003 2:09:42 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win (V stands for Victory, and W is its plural!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

13 posted on 05/07/2003 6:34:46 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
bttt
14 posted on 05/07/2003 8:24:40 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
backatcha!
15 posted on 05/07/2003 8:29:14 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

.
16 posted on 05/07/2003 8:41:29 AM PDT by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Wouldn't a battle between the Vatican and the UN be fairer?

Just asking...

17 posted on 05/07/2003 8:51:57 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
There is already a bill in the House to get us out of the UN. The same sponsor has one to keep us from signing back on to UNESCO.
18 posted on 05/07/2003 8:56:28 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse; knighthawk; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; fatima; amom; Alamo-Girl; Coleus; ...
BumPing
19 posted on 05/07/2003 9:18:44 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
bump
20 posted on 05/07/2003 9:19:39 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson