Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Revives Clintons' Vince Foster Scandal
NewsMax.com ^ | Monday, May 5, 2003 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 05/05/2003 11:42:30 AM PDT by Jean S

Are Bill and Hillary Clinton sweating now that the Supreme Court today revived the controversy over Vince Foster's death?

Urged by the Bush administration, the court said it would decide in autumn whether the government must release post-mortem pictures of the Clinton White House attorney's "suicide."

At stake is "the privacy interest of millions of individuals, about whom personal and sensitive information is stored in government files," Solicitor General Theodore Olson told the court.

Olson insisted that five investigations had showed Foster killed himself and that a sixth inquiry "by an unsatisfied private citizen" seemed unnecessary. But for the whole story, see Christopher Ruddy's "The Strange Death of Vincent Foster."

Accuracy in Media, a public interest group that maintained Foster's suicide note was a forgery, filed a request with Park Police seeking autopsy photographs and photos of Foster's body at Fort Marcy Park in McLean, Va.

The government refused, and a federal appeals court in Washington agreed. The court claimed the pictures were exempted from the mandatory disclosure provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

AIM said it wanted the photos to uncover "government foul play," but unless the group had compelling evidence there was not enough reason to justify an invasion of privacy, the appeals court said.

Attorney Allan J. Favish, who represented AIM, then filed his own FOIA request with the independent counsel's office to obtain the photos. When the office refused, Favish filed suit in federal court in Los Angeles.

Though a federal judge again said that there was no evidence justifying the invasion of privacy, a divided appeals court panel reversed and said evidence was not necessary.

When the case was sent back to trial court, the judge, under the appeals court's guidance, ordered the release of five of the 10 photographs of Foster's body, including one that had been published in Time magazine.

The government, joined by members of Foster's family, appealed. This time, an appeals court panel ordered the release of nine of the 10 photos. When the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, with headquarters in San Francisco, refused to hear the case, the government asked the Supreme Court for review.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloodhounds; clinton; scotus; theodoreolson; vincefoster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: muggs
ping
41 posted on 05/06/2003 7:48:12 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ChemistCat
"He was also the clinton's bag man who carried their drug money to Swiss banks."

yitbos

42 posted on 05/06/2003 8:05:54 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (Trust quidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muggs
ping
43 posted on 05/09/2003 12:55:01 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
BUMP TO THE TOP!
44 posted on 05/09/2003 12:56:26 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
There have been millions of words written on this subject but the bottom line is:

This was a Hillary ordered hit and a Hillary ordered coverup.

Anyone who has looked into her eyes knows she is quite capable of ordering cold blooded murder and quite prepared to murder others to cover her trail.

What they should wrtte on Vince's tombstone is "He had _very_ bad taste in women." ;-)
45 posted on 05/09/2003 1:02:09 PM PDT by cgbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
ping
46 posted on 05/10/2003 12:29:59 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: timestax
ping
47 posted on 05/10/2003 7:00:44 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: muggs
ping
48 posted on 05/10/2003 2:14:54 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: timestax
ping
49 posted on 05/10/2003 3:27:11 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
"The real question(to me) is how anybody could think anything "positive" about the Clintoons?"

Political strategists at the RNC love the clintons more than the NRA loves Feinsweine and Schumerscum. The mere mention of either bring donations and votes. Showing their pictures evokes emotional reactions of fear and deep seated hatred.

The clinton finger wag picture is worth millions.

50 posted on 05/10/2003 3:50:51 PM PDT by SSN558 (Be on the lookout for Black White-Supremists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SSN558
The clintonclintoon finger wag picture is worth millions.

LOL!

51 posted on 05/11/2003 7:11:54 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
bump
52 posted on 05/19/2003 5:16:03 PM PDT by nocuous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muggs
ping
53 posted on 05/20/2003 9:57:07 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
bumping for the truth!
54 posted on 05/20/2003 9:58:06 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muggs
ping
55 posted on 05/20/2003 10:14:29 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: timestax
ping
56 posted on 05/21/2003 9:17:19 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I heard Allan J. Favish on a radio show over the weekend. He was fantastic. He intends to get to the bottom of this, and knows in his heart and by the evidence that Foster did not kill himself. Anyone who reads any of the stories on the subject cannot believe he did. Hoping with him that the Supreme court ends the coverup, but who knows?
57 posted on 05/21/2003 9:21:51 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
I think you are right. Bush cannot appear to undermine Clinton, but it sure looks like a lot of drip, drip, drip!
58 posted on 05/21/2003 9:22:56 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
At times, I think the only difference between the two partys is the spelling.

Oh my!

59 posted on 05/21/2003 9:27:24 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Let's see, yesterday's news cycle had Sid Blumenthal floating Hillary 2004 trial balloons and today's news cycle has something on the Foster case. Coincidence? Could be. Or maybe not.
60 posted on 05/21/2003 9:31:23 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson