Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/04/2003 4:58:05 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Aunt Polgara
S.C.U. Alum ping
2 posted on 05/04/2003 4:58:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lady In Blue; Desdemona; Canticle_of_Deborah; Salvation; NYer; JMJ333; Litany; Siobhan; Maeve
ping
3 posted on 05/04/2003 4:59:18 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org; Pyro7480; narses; Romulus; MHGinTN; Black Agnes; SMEDLEYBUTLER; madprof98; ...
ping
4 posted on 05/04/2003 5:00:46 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Catholic_list
ping
5 posted on 05/04/2003 5:01:00 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
This is long, long, long overdue. My church would be well served by getting rid of the pedophile priests and the abortion politicians.
7 posted on 05/04/2003 5:10:05 PM PDT by doug from upland (my dogs ran from the room when they heard Hillary shrieking on the radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; Coleus; Salvation; billbears; patent; fatima; JMJ333; amom; Alamo-Girl; ...

8 posted on 05/04/2003 5:11:25 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Pro Choice Murder/ Abortion--- Practicing Roman Catholic, in good standing with The Church???


9 posted on 05/04/2003 5:22:49 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
The Bible states that if you have a disagreement with a brother in the church, bring it to the church. If they refuse to adjust their behavior you are to "treat them like a tax collector"
What do you do when they already ARE tax collectors?
If these pols have issues with the doctrine of abortion in their faith they need to get in line or resign from the church. It's a matter of ethics. IMHO
10 posted on 05/04/2003 5:26:22 PM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Ted Kennedy:

http://www.ytedk.com/
http://www.yankeesamizdat.org/ACBigots/ACB.html
http://www.christiangallery.com/atrocity/deaths/bl75rmcdowell.htm
http://www.space.com/news/kennedy_tapes_010822.html
19 posted on 05/04/2003 5:43:19 PM PDT by Coleus (RU-486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I have always been sorely disappointed/disgusted that the Vatican has not leaned heaviliy on the damn bishops (choosing my words carefully) to deal more harshly with pro-aborts/pro-sodommites. This policy of "Oh, we don't want to be so harsh that we lose congregants" is ignorant - if the congregants continue to believe this crap, then you've already lost them. Ignoring the issues doesn't help, and allows more to stray. No way should any person, politician or otherwise, be allowed to receive Holy Communion. The thought of Fat Boy Kennedy receiving it makes me ill; thankfully, he will be dealt with later.

I've said it before many times - the Catholic Church is not a political organization whose doctrine can be changed over time through moral "change" or majority opinion. His Word and Teachings do not "evolve" - what is right is right, today as it was 2000 years ago.

23 posted on 05/04/2003 5:47:42 PM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
This one got it exactly right--about the bishops as much as about the politicians. The Perez example is one I myself remember. I often wonder why contemporary bishops are so much less steadfast--unless, of course, they themselves do not really believe abortion is wrong either.
25 posted on 05/04/2003 5:49:54 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"“Pro-choice” Catholic politicians support abortion mostly for political reasons. The U.S. bishops say this is unacceptable. So why do they accept it? "

Duh... lemmme think...maybe because their voters don't care what U.S. bishops say about it... Ya'think?

28 posted on 05/04/2003 5:53:55 PM PDT by RS (nc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I suspect that Ms. Mikulski has more problems with the Catholic Church than abortion. Like maybe rampant Lesbianism? But then, the Liberal pukes in Maryland don't really give a damn. Nor does the Archbishop.


29 posted on 05/04/2003 5:56:23 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Thank you for pinging me, but after you read the following you may decide to pull my name from your ping list. But those ready for strong meat, have ears to hear, for I offer this in Christian love, to chide my fellow Christians on this Sabbath day.

To borrow from Tom Daschle, "I'm deeply saddened." Why? ... Because the Catholic Church has lain with the whore, to speak metaphorically, and Biblically!

Bishop Hart looked as­kance at this question. Then he said, “Well, it would be a very rare situation that we would deny Communion to anyone.”
“Have you talked to Senator Dodd about his views on abortion and cloning?”
“That would be a personal thing,” he said plainly.
“Can you think of any circumstances in which Communion would be denied?”
Bishop Hart paused. He turned slightly and thought the matter over for about ten seconds. Finally he said, with the air of someone genuinely stumped, “I can’t think of any situation where I would deny Holy Communion.”
In such a posture, communion wouldn't be Holy from this Bishop, merely a hollow ritual.

Such an man does not represent MY LORD and Savior. The Catholic Church presents itself as intermediary between man and God. If the Church cannot and/or will not as policy withhold the Flesh and Blood of My Lord from persons supporting the slaughter of fellow individual human beings, the Church is no longer in touch with God and has lain with the whore.

What the failure of the Church to uphold righteousness is leading to is the tacit acceptance of human cannibalism. Imagine, it will be the cannibalized bodies of individual human lives conceived solely for harvesting body parts that the Church will be completely impotent to oppose, because the Church has not stood for righteousness regarding the alive unborn with their own members!

The 'whoremongering' Church has given cover to the enemies of Life for so long now, the Church is no longer in touch with The Savior. Some Priests and Bishops still strive to serve Our Lord, but as a body, the edicts of the Holy Father are routinely ignored by Priests and Bishops thus giving cover to reprobate catholics. It is the Lord who will judge this whoremongering, this gross failure to be His Priests. It is the Lord's forgiveness the Church ought seek, and prove repentance with action.

The Church gives lip service to piety yet allows the practicing Catholic to establish the rules, individually. It is clear that Jesus is no longer the acknowledged leader of the Church, establishing what is written at the end of Judges, "In those days there was no King in Israel, and everyman did what was right in his own eyes." Read again what Bishop Hart asserted, and see in his smarmy complicity the words found in Judges: “That would be a personal thing,” he said plainly. Yes, to choose what is right and wrong is a personal thing, not the purview of a Church laying with The Whore.

30 posted on 05/04/2003 6:05:06 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I grew up in college during the civil rights movement, during the early days of the conflict over the war in Vietnam, the environmental movement, and the women’s movement

Open wide, Kerry. I got a movement for ya.

32 posted on 05/04/2003 6:18:39 PM PDT by WhaChuLookinAt (As a matter of fact, I DO put my pants on both legs at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
As far as I'm concerned, anyone who supports elective abortion under ANY circumstance deserves excommunication from the Earth.
34 posted on 05/04/2003 6:30:34 PM PDT by WhaChuLookinAt (As a matter of fact, I DO put my pants on both legs at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Some additional threads about Catholics and politicians:

Catholic Church asks Tom Daschle to stop calling himself a Catholic

On Catholic Politicians and Faith

Vatican Urges Catholic Politicians to Vote Along Church Lines

Senator Santorum on Being Catholic and a Politician

William E. Simon, Sr. and Jr. Devout Catholics, Philanthropists and Politicians

Deadly Dozen senator taken to task over claims of Catholicism

THE BISHOP AND THE SENATOR [author links to FR thread regarding Daschle in her online column]

36 posted on 05/04/2003 6:37:12 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
But when persuasion fails—repeatedly—isn’t coercion then necessary?

This is the conclusion that St. Augustine sadly came to after fruitlessly debating the Donatists of Africa, who had left Africa in a state of civil war for a hundred years.

46 posted on 05/04/2003 8:07:06 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
Bishop Hart paused. He turned slightly and thought the matter over for about ten seconds. Finally he said, with the air of someone genuinely stumped, “I can’t think of any situation where I would deny Holy Communion.”

This is emblematic of the enire Modernism problem in the Church. No one is EVER in a state of Mortal Sin, no not EVER.

58 posted on 05/04/2003 8:41:22 PM PDT by narses (Christe Eleison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I wish the Pope would be just as serious about the priests that abuse children - but he refuses.
63 posted on 05/04/2003 9:58:37 PM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson