Skip to comments.
Analysis: 'Shock and awe' for Democrats (MUST READ!!)
UPI Chief White House Correspondent ^
| 5/2/2003
| Nicholas M. Horrock
Posted on 05/02/2003 10:42:07 PM PDT by Jewels1091
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-136 next last
To: Schakaljager
This photo is now on my home page, I understand on the home page of a few other freepers. This photo firms our resolve and drives GW's enemies even more insane.
61
posted on
05/03/2003 6:16:30 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: Grampa Dave
We need to get someone to host that picture before US News removes it from their site. I am saving it, but it will be on my hard drive and not available for posting.
To: bert
Bert posted, "I think an effort should be mounted to provide all the rats in the congress with a 36" strip of yellow caution tape. The tape is to be stapled to their suit collars whenever they appear in public."
Bert, is that 36 inches long or 36 inches wide or both?
63
posted on
05/03/2003 6:21:00 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: Grampa Dave
great picture. 1000 words and counting.
To: Jewels1091
I read this as a very cynical piece. To be sure, the Dems are soiling their underthings, but this column is snotty.
To: Miss Marple; MeeknMing
Richard, can you store this picture and a few other great shots on your server as Miss Marple has suggested. Thanks!
66
posted on
05/03/2003 6:23:51 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: Jewels1091
The nine Democrats conduct their first debate Saturday evening at 9 p.m. EDT in South Carolina. They were unable to persuade any national channel to carry the debate live, and ABC finally agreed to tape it. What a bunch of bull. The DNC doesn't want the "National" channels to cover the debate because it would show the RATs eating their own - plain and simple. Afterall, if someone has a debate, and there is no one around to see it, did it actual occur? (meaning, you can't hold the participants accountable for their LEFT leaning views during primary season to secure the nomination, when it comes time to move to the center and face off against "W".
To: Jewels1091
"The nine Democrats conduct their first debate Saturday evening at 9 p.m. EDT in South Carolina. They were unable to persuade any national channel to carry the debate live, and ABC finally agreed to tape it. The first national TV broadcast of it will air at 1:30 a.m."
Which makes me wonder if it will beat the local station which airs the infomercial for the Shreddavegematic or Abbuttbustermachine at that time. I can't wait to see the ratings on this one.
68
posted on
05/03/2003 6:27:53 AM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(If a Frenchman and a German farted in the Ardennes, would Belgium surrender?)
To: c-b 1
"At this time in 91 the Dem candidates looked like a bunch of rag tag wannabes, then the media mind control kicked in."
One major difference is that the WTC was still standing and we were still an isolated nation, never attacked and suffering civilian casualties on our own soil in 91. Never forget.
69
posted on
05/03/2003 6:29:43 AM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(If a Frenchman and a German farted in the Ardennes, would Belgium surrender?)
To: Beck_isright
The debate will be shown at 11:30 pm EST tonight on ABC. At least it will be here in my city.
70
posted on
05/03/2003 6:31:46 AM PDT
by
Wait4Truth
(God Bless our President!)
To: Jim Noble
"Visualize 61 GOP Senators."
Hmmmm, if that happened, that means I could visualize Paul Begala and Cueball swinging from a shower rod too.....
71
posted on
05/03/2003 6:31:57 AM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(If a Frenchman and a German farted in the Ardennes, would Belgium surrender?)
To: Jewels1091
There was a time when opinion pieces were held to a higher standard than this. They had to be more than just the random musings of a partisan mind. The best of them developed a logical argument, and it was against the rules to employ errors of fact to support the case. If a President made an address and said, "The war on terror is not over, yet it is not endless," it would have been considered quite strange for a newspaper columnist to write the next day, "The war, he says endlessly, could be endless." In the past that would have been considered false reporting, literally claiming the opposite of something that millions of people saw and heard as it happened. Today this is no longer odd. It is a characteristic of liberal newspaper columnists that they state things that are not so, as part of developing their argument... even when they must be aware that tens of millions of people will instantly recognize that they are not telling the truth. They don't care. They are writing the "first draft of history," and history will eventually become whatever they say it is. In a similar vein, liberals will forever be writing, "Even if no weapons of mass destruction are found in Iraq or real connections to al-Qaida established..." in the same way that they previously stated that "Bush has simply not made the case." It is a mantra, a phrase endlessly repeated according to the Gospel of Goebbels. Have we found documents in Iraq proving that the government of Saddam Hussein invited one of bin Laden's lieutenants to Baghdad, and hosted him for two weeks in a series of meetings? Well, yes, but so what? We can still say that no real connections to al Qa'ida have been established, because we're liberals and we can just lie. The snippy little references like "sitting out Vietnam flying in the Texas Air National Guard" and endless repetitions of the phrase "his war" are part of the genre. We expect little slings and arrows to be hurled at the columnist's political opponents. That's fair, but next time, could we please stick to the facts? |
72
posted on
05/03/2003 6:32:32 AM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
To: Wait4Truth
No thanks, I'll watch the infomercial channel before I watch that joke. Let me know when they get down to three or four losers, then it will get interesting.
73
posted on
05/03/2003 6:33:33 AM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(If a Frenchman and a German farted in the Ardennes, would Belgium surrender?)
To: All
74
posted on
05/03/2003 6:34:57 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: Jewels1091
The first national TV broadcast of it will air at 1:30 a.m. ROTFLMAO! Love it!
75
posted on
05/03/2003 6:36:59 AM PDT
by
6ppc
To: Jewels1091
Augustinian America RULES; may it always be such!
76
posted on
05/03/2003 6:40:15 AM PDT
by
AlbionGirl
(A kite flies highest against the wind, not with it. - Winston Churchill)
To: patriciaruth
And the adulation could all have been his if only he'd been honorable and a patriot. Yeah, I'm tired of everyone saying Clinton never had his chance. The Cole was attacked by Al Qaida, the World Trade Center was attacked in 1993 by Al Qaida, and Oklahoma City was attacked by Iraq it looks like. The Dems knew that Iraq was in on Oklahoma City but Clinton's hatred of conservatives caused him to blame it on Rush Limbaugh and hide the fact that Iraq had connections. All three of these incidents are justification for a major war on terror but we had a Commander in Chief in Bill Clinton that would rather play his little political games and not do the right thing and take a chance on a major war.
77
posted on
05/03/2003 6:44:04 AM PDT
by
#3Fan
To: c-b 1
At this time in 91 the Dem candidates looked like a bunch of rag tag wannabes, then the media mind control kicked in.Exactly. And don't forget Winston Churchill. He was booted out right after winning WW2 for an incompetent liberal. We can't take anything for granted. War heros are soon forgotten in elections.
78
posted on
05/03/2003 6:49:46 AM PDT
by
#3Fan
To: dawn53
The nets could have labeled SNL2, or Saturday Night Liars!
79
posted on
05/03/2003 6:50:50 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: Grampa Dave
80
posted on
05/03/2003 7:07:44 AM PDT
by
bert
(Don't Panic !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson