Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sabrina Aisenberg may be alive and well in Illinois
Bay News ^ | 5-1-03 | N/A

Posted on 05/01/2003 9:06:02 PM PDT by JustPiper

There may be a major break in the Sabrina Aisenberg case.

Attorneys for the Aisenbergs tell us authorities are now trying to determine if a little girl currently living in Pontiac, Illinois is Sabrina.

In March 1998, a woman gave a baby girl to a migrant worker in McCallan, Texas.

More Information Click here to learn more about the case.

The migrant worker gave the baby to a nurse after she learned she was going to be deported. The nurse, instead of turning the baby over to a welfare worker, gave the baby to her sister in Pontiac, Illinois.

A woman recognized the baby from age-progression pictures distributed on missing children's websites and posters as looking like Sabrina Aisenberg.

The Aisenberg's attorney says the couple as optimistic and excited about the possibility the child is theirs. He said pictures of the 6-year-old girl in Illinois resemble Sabrina's baby pictures, and she's the right age.

The Illinois family has raised the child since about late 1998, but a judge would not allow them to adopt her because the family didn't have a birth certificate.

The Pontiac Police Department is conducting an investigation into the identity of the little girl. Major developments in the Aisenberg case

Steve and Marlene Aisenberg The Saga began November 24th of 1997 when Steve and Marlene reported baby Sabrina missing. A grand jury probe started February 4th, 1998. The Aisenbergs testified before that grand jury on February 11th. A year and a half later a federal indictment was filed and the couple was arrested on September 9th 1999. In January of 2000, transcripts of the secret audiotapes were released to the media. The tapes were heard once by a judge July 17th. In February of 2001 a judge threw out the secret tapes as evidence in the case. Later that month all charges against the Aisenbergs were dropped. In December 2001 detectives who handled the Aisenberg case were cleared of any criminal wrongdoing. The next major development happened in February of 2002, the actual audio tapes investigators made of the Aisenbergs were released. Then in January of this year the Aisenbergs were awarded $2.8 million to reimburse their attorney and court fees. The U.S. Attorney asked the Department of Justice to handle the appeal for that ruling. Steve and Marlene Aisenberg now live in Maryland.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: alive; missing

1 posted on 05/01/2003 9:06:02 PM PDT by JustPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Spunky
I got so excited when you pinged me on this, I forgot more details and pictures!

There are many similarities between the pictures.

Steve and Marlene Aisenberg

Personally I never trusted the parents. What is my homestate a harbor for kidnapped children?! Two now!

2 posted on 05/01/2003 9:08:53 PM PDT by JustPiper (Fire the UN! Revoke their lease!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Sabrina Aisenberg may be alive and living in Illinois an ABC Action News report 5/01/03

This picture of the girl, now called Paloma, bears a resemblance to Sabrina

TAMPA - Sabrina Aisenberg may be alive after all.

The 5-month-old disappeared from her Bloomingdale home in November of 1997. However, ABC Action News has learned that investigators are looking into the possibility that she is alive and currently living in Illinois.

In the eyes of Tampa police, Sabrina's parents were the top suspects in her disappearance. The investigation was admittedly botched by detectives, however, and no charges were ever prosecuted.

The Aisenbergs' attorneys won a nearly $3-million award for a frivolous and bad faith prosecution in January. The couple now lives in Bethesda, Maryland.

The latest chapter in this saga begins in Illinois, where a woman browsing a Web site that lists missing children spotted a photo of a girl labeled as unidentified. The woman thought the picture resembled Sabrina Aisenberg, so she contacted the family.

The story of the child in the picture spans several states and years. In McAllen, Texas, just months after Sabrina disappeared, a young girl turned over a baby to a friend, claiming she was too young to care for the child. That friend was deported seven months later, and the baby was turned over to a nurse at a migrant clinic.

The nurse, in turn, gave the baby to her sister in Pontiac, Illinois, who was unable to bear children naturally. That child is now six years old, the same age Sabrina would be.

It is unclear how a picture of the girl ended up on the Web site, but the strong resemblance to Sabrina was enough to give the Aisenbergs hope.

"You put all that together, and there's something very unusual about the way this woman in Illinois acquired the baby. And the resemblance, when you factor that in, it gave us some optimism that maybe this is a promising lead," explained the couple's attorney, Todd Foster.

Now, the Aisenbergs are asking for DNA testing to find out if the girl in Illinois, who has been named Paloma, is actually Sabrina. Those tests could take weeks to be completed.

3 posted on 05/01/2003 9:15:37 PM PDT by JustPiper (Fire the UN! Revoke their lease!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief; tomkow6; chicagolady; RedWing9; unspun; TheRightGuy; spintreebob
Chicago Ping!!!
4 posted on 05/01/2003 9:28:12 PM PDT by JustPiper (Fire the UN! Revoke their lease!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
In McAllen, Texas, just months after Sabrina disappeared, a young girl turned over a baby to a friend, claiming she was too young to care for the child.

If this is true, it just doesn't fit that a young girl who was not able to care for a child would have gone into the home and stole the child right out of her crib.

5 posted on 05/01/2003 9:32:15 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Spunky, was there ever anything wrong with Sabrina? I remember a problem with the father being a perfectionist and there was implication he sold Sabrina?
6 posted on 05/01/2003 9:35:52 PM PDT by JustPiper (Fire the UN! Revoke their lease!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MightyMouseToSaveThe Day; uvular; eleni121; Salman; JohnHuang2; Kathy in Alaska; nopardons
Lawyers: Child in Illinois May Be Aisenbergs' Missing Daughter
By Mitch Stacy Associated Press Writer
Published: May 1, 2003




TAMPA, Fla. (AP) - Lawyers for a couple whose daughter disappeared six years ago are asking for DNA testing to determine if a girl that turned up recently in Illinois is theirs.
Steven and Marlene Aisenberg, once considered suspects in the 1997 disappearance of 5-month-old Sabrina from their suburban Tampa home, are "hopeful" about the discovery, said Todd Foster, one of their attorneys.

"They're optimistic, and they are excited about it," Foster said Thursday. "They've been waiting for a break to occur since that morning in November 1997 when they noticed their daughter missing, and they hope this is it."

Police in Pontiac, Ill., told the Aisenbergs' lawyers that the child came to a family there through a woman in McAllen, Texas, who was being deported. A nurse in Texas then took the child and gave her to a sister in Pontiac who wanted a baby but couldn't conceive.

Foster said pictures of the 6-year-old girl named Paloma in Illinois resemble Sabrina's baby pictures, and she's the right age. The child was also passed around with no birth certificate or other legal identification, "which is something you'd expect with a child that was kidnapped," he said.

The Illinois family has raised the child since about late 1998, but a judge would not allow her adoption because she didn't have a birth certificate. The judge ordered a search for the child's parents, and her picture was posted on a missing children's Web site.

Foster said he did not know girl's or the family's last name.

Foster said a woman called the Aisenbergs in mid-March to tell them a picture of the little girl on the Web site resembled Sabrina's baby photos.

Lawyers wrote a letter to police in Pontiac asking them to begin the process of getting a DNA sample from the girl, Foster said. A judge likely will have to order it because the child does not have a legal guardian, he said.

He said he didn't know how long it could take. A message left with police officials in Pontiac was not immediately returned late Thursday.

After Sabrina's disappearance, Hillsborough County sheriff's investigators suspected the Aisenbergs and got a judge's permission to put listening devices in the couple's kitchen and bathroom. Two years later, a grand jury indicted the couple on charges of conspiracy and making false statements.

But a federal judge found the tapes mostly inaudible, and they were thrown out as evidence when it was determined that detectives lied to get permission to bug the home.

The federal government was ordered in January to pay $2.8 million in legal fees to the Aisenbergs, who now live in Bethesda, Md.

7 posted on 05/01/2003 9:42:28 PM PDT by JustPiper (Fire the UN! Revoke their lease!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
I also remember that case and recall that the parents gave me the creeps. It's been so long that I can't really remember all the details; however, taped conversations from their home come to mind.
8 posted on 05/01/2003 9:50:07 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Spunky, was there ever anything wrong with Sabrina?

I do not recall that there was ever any mention that the baby had any problems.

9 posted on 05/01/2003 9:50:49 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
...taped conversations from their home come to mind.

From another article:
After Sabrina's disappearance, Hillsborough County sheriff's investigators suspected the Aisenbergs and got a judge's permission to put listening devices in the couple's kitchen and bathroom. Two years later, a grand jury indicted the couple on charges of conspiracy and making false statements. But a federal judge found the tapes mostly inaudible, and they were thrown out as evidence when it was determined that detectives lied to get permission to bug the home. The federal government was ordered in January to pay $2.8 million in legal fees to the Aisenbergs, who now live in Bethesda, Md.

10 posted on 05/01/2003 9:56:47 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Lots of links here (plenty don't work, but you can pick up the gist of the case): http://www.marvelcreations.com/sabri3d.html
11 posted on 05/01/2003 10:15:32 PM PDT by Kiss Me Hardy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
"Personally I never trusted the parents."


Ditto. If this is Sabrina, the abduction theory doesn't work. 'A woman' gave the baby to a 'migrant worker' who couldn't keep her so she gave her to a 'nurse' who gave her to her 'sister'. Why would someone risk entering a house in Florida, with parents and other children present, to abduct a baby to give away to someone in Texas?

Just makes the case more interesting!
12 posted on 05/01/2003 11:03:36 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kiss Me Hardy
Spunky found a current site also, where I was able to get the story's:

Here

13 posted on 05/01/2003 11:06:30 PM PDT by JustPiper (Fire the UN! Revoke their lease!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
I went to the site and the pictures reminded me of something. When Sabrina was reported missing, the parents (mother I think) gave the police a baby picture of one of their other children. The 'error' was corrected, but it was something that was brought up in the many stories during the search.
14 posted on 05/01/2003 11:40:29 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson