Posted on 05/01/2003 9:06:02 PM PDT by JustPiper
There may be a major break in the Sabrina Aisenberg case.
Attorneys for the Aisenbergs tell us authorities are now trying to determine if a little girl currently living in Pontiac, Illinois is Sabrina.
In March 1998, a woman gave a baby girl to a migrant worker in McCallan, Texas.
More Information Click here to learn more about the case.
The migrant worker gave the baby to a nurse after she learned she was going to be deported. The nurse, instead of turning the baby over to a welfare worker, gave the baby to her sister in Pontiac, Illinois.
A woman recognized the baby from age-progression pictures distributed on missing children's websites and posters as looking like Sabrina Aisenberg.
The Aisenberg's attorney says the couple as optimistic and excited about the possibility the child is theirs. He said pictures of the 6-year-old girl in Illinois resemble Sabrina's baby pictures, and she's the right age.
The Illinois family has raised the child since about late 1998, but a judge would not allow them to adopt her because the family didn't have a birth certificate.
The Pontiac Police Department is conducting an investigation into the identity of the little girl. Major developments in the Aisenberg case
Steve and Marlene Aisenberg The Saga began November 24th of 1997 when Steve and Marlene reported baby Sabrina missing. A grand jury probe started February 4th, 1998. The Aisenbergs testified before that grand jury on February 11th. A year and a half later a federal indictment was filed and the couple was arrested on September 9th 1999. In January of 2000, transcripts of the secret audiotapes were released to the media. The tapes were heard once by a judge July 17th. In February of 2001 a judge threw out the secret tapes as evidence in the case. Later that month all charges against the Aisenbergs were dropped. In December 2001 detectives who handled the Aisenberg case were cleared of any criminal wrongdoing. The next major development happened in February of 2002, the actual audio tapes investigators made of the Aisenbergs were released. Then in January of this year the Aisenbergs were awarded $2.8 million to reimburse their attorney and court fees. The U.S. Attorney asked the Department of Justice to handle the appeal for that ruling. Steve and Marlene Aisenberg now live in Maryland.
There are many similarities between the pictures.
Steve and Marlene Aisenberg
Personally I never trusted the parents. What is my homestate a harbor for kidnapped children?! Two now!
This picture of the girl, now called Paloma, bears a resemblance to Sabrina
TAMPA - Sabrina Aisenberg may be alive after all.
The 5-month-old disappeared from her Bloomingdale home in November of 1997. However, ABC Action News has learned that investigators are looking into the possibility that she is alive and currently living in Illinois.
In the eyes of Tampa police, Sabrina's parents were the top suspects in her disappearance. The investigation was admittedly botched by detectives, however, and no charges were ever prosecuted.
The Aisenbergs' attorneys won a nearly $3-million award for a frivolous and bad faith prosecution in January. The couple now lives in Bethesda, Maryland.
The latest chapter in this saga begins in Illinois, where a woman browsing a Web site that lists missing children spotted a photo of a girl labeled as unidentified. The woman thought the picture resembled Sabrina Aisenberg, so she contacted the family.
The story of the child in the picture spans several states and years. In McAllen, Texas, just months after Sabrina disappeared, a young girl turned over a baby to a friend, claiming she was too young to care for the child. That friend was deported seven months later, and the baby was turned over to a nurse at a migrant clinic.
The nurse, in turn, gave the baby to her sister in Pontiac, Illinois, who was unable to bear children naturally. That child is now six years old, the same age Sabrina would be.
It is unclear how a picture of the girl ended up on the Web site, but the strong resemblance to Sabrina was enough to give the Aisenbergs hope.
"You put all that together, and there's something very unusual about the way this woman in Illinois acquired the baby. And the resemblance, when you factor that in, it gave us some optimism that maybe this is a promising lead," explained the couple's attorney, Todd Foster.
Now, the Aisenbergs are asking for DNA testing to find out if the girl in Illinois, who has been named Paloma, is actually Sabrina. Those tests could take weeks to be completed.
If this is true, it just doesn't fit that a young girl who was not able to care for a child would have gone into the home and stole the child right out of her crib.
I do not recall that there was ever any mention that the baby had any problems.
From another article:
After Sabrina's disappearance, Hillsborough County sheriff's investigators suspected the Aisenbergs and got a judge's permission to put listening devices in the couple's kitchen and bathroom. Two years later, a grand jury indicted the couple on charges of conspiracy and making false statements. But a federal judge found the tapes mostly inaudible, and they were thrown out as evidence when it was determined that detectives lied to get permission to bug the home. The federal government was ordered in January to pay $2.8 million in legal fees to the Aisenbergs, who now live in Bethesda, Md.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.