Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHO or WHOM? A 90% Trick
Self | 30APR03 | bannie

Posted on 04/30/2003 6:15:29 PM PDT by bannie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-318 next last
To: CharacterCounts
OK...it might be better to turn questions into declarative statements, because the nominative/accusative distinction is the same. Which looks right, "You trust he" or "You trust him"? The latter (I hope :), so it's "Whom do you trust?"
161 posted on 04/30/2003 8:37:47 PM PDT by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bannie
I think the confusion with lie/lay is introduced with the past tense, where lie becomes lay.
162 posted on 04/30/2003 8:38:48 PM PDT by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: bannie
A "bad button" for me is hearing, "Good" as a reply to, "How are you?".
163 posted on 04/30/2003 8:39:14 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I before E except after C

That's not the whole rule. The whole rule is "I before E except after C, when the sound is 'EE'".

When the sound is not 'EE', the rule does not apply. Also there are a few exceptions, the commonest of which is "seize".

Personally, I get upset when people use words the meanings of which they clearly neither understand nor can be bothered to look up.

For example: the use of "ironically" to mean "co-incidentally"; of "only" to mean "few" (as in "he was one of the only men to survive the attack"); of "unique" to mean "rare" (as opposed to "the only one of its kind"), or of "disinterested" to mean "uninterested".

And don't get me started on the confusion between "its" (belonging to it) and "it's" ("it is" or "it has").

164 posted on 04/30/2003 8:39:56 PM PDT by derlauerer (Richard Of York Gained Battles In Vain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Brian
will and shall

AS I BELIEVE IT TO BE, "will" is not as absolute as "shall."

I SHALL, however, research this one further: There must be more to it...such as the auxillary verb thing. Offhand, I'm not thinking of all of the rules for this. Great question.

:-)

165 posted on 04/30/2003 8:40:02 PM PDT by bannie (Carrying the burdon of being a poor speller--mixed with the curse of verbosity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bannie
What was a goat doing in the cement pond?
166 posted on 04/30/2003 8:41:08 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bannie
AS I BELIEVE IT TO BE, "will" is not as absolute as "shall."

If I recall correctly, it depends on the person. I shall becomes I will for emphasis, whereas he will becomes he shall for emphasis.

167 posted on 04/30/2003 8:43:22 PM PDT by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: bannie
ok, ok now i understand about he and him - what about she and her
168 posted on 04/30/2003 8:43:26 PM PDT by ThinkLikeWaterAndReeds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Minus Four
LOLOL

Gosh, I wish I could get the hang of posting pictures...

BTW, when I was little my mother taught me this one:

To determine if a word is a preposition, fill in the blank:

A bird flew ________ a cloud.

If it makes even a little sense, the word is a preposition, and therefore no sentence should ever end with it. (A sentence ending in a preposition is something up with which she would not put...)

Regards,
169 posted on 04/30/2003 8:43:35 PM PDT by VermiciousKnid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: not_apathetic_anymore
affect/effect

EFFECT is a noun. ("It has an effect on me.")

AFFECT is a verb. ("This affect us all adversely.")

170 posted on 04/30/2003 8:43:57 PM PDT by bannie (Carrying the burdon of being a poor speller--mixed with the curse of verbosity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Yes, along with the use of "they" when one is afraid to use the neutral "he" and related constructions. For example, What parent doesn't want THEIR child to succeed? We used to be quite comfortable saying What parent doesn't want his child to succeed, knowing perfectly well that half of parents are women. In the 70s and 80s there was some usage of a gender revolutionary nature, militantly using she and her in place of he and his, etc. A good teacher knows HER students. Oh well.... if this is the greatest of our worries we are not in too bad shape.
171 posted on 04/30/2003 8:46:00 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Brian
Well... I don't know whether the distinction that I was given in school was ever really used. In school I was told that "will" is simple future, but "shall" indicates intent. (I vaguely recall even being told that the distinction depended in part on first person versus second and third, so that for second and third person it's the other way around!) Etymologically, this makes no sense, because "will" is cognate to Dutch and German "willen," to want (e.g. "Ik wil een kopje koffie kopen," "I want to buy a cup of coffee."), so "will" ought to indicate intent.


It does at least give rise to a bad joke. Q: how can you tell which of two drowning English teachers is committing suicide? A: The suicide cries out "I shall drown; no one will save me!" while the victim cries out "I will drown; no one shall save me!" (Miss Methvin, wherever you are, I'm sorry...)
172 posted on 04/30/2003 8:46:46 PM PDT by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
Turn the sentence around a bit, and it becomes clear:
Do you trust HE?
vs.
Do you trust HIM?
173 posted on 04/30/2003 8:47:17 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bannie
Now if you could only teach half the posters the difference between 'lose' and 'loose'...
174 posted on 04/30/2003 8:47:30 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus
You knew it was nickEL, right?
175 posted on 04/30/2003 8:48:01 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

So The Who blew it?
176 posted on 04/30/2003 8:48:20 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Who affects the Who's effects?

Little Cindy-lou Who, that's who.

Who dissects the Who's diced eggs?

177 posted on 04/30/2003 8:49:43 PM PDT by Huber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: not_apathetic_anymore
"Affect" is a verb (outside of a relatively obscure psychology usage); "effect" is a noun (OK...it can be used as a verb, e.g. "to effect a drastic change"). For example: Kryptonite doesn't affect Earthlings; it has no effect on them.
178 posted on 04/30/2003 8:50:00 PM PDT by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: not_apathetic_anymore
Here is my stab and affect/effect. Generally, affect is used as a verb, and effect is a noun. The only frequent use of effect as a verb is in the expression "to effect a change" or the like.
179 posted on 04/30/2003 8:50:01 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
"...Good" as a reply to, "How are you?".

It's funny the looks I sometimes get when my answer is, "I am well, thanks."

180 posted on 04/30/2003 8:51:28 PM PDT by j_tull (Keep the Shiny Side UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-318 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson