Posted on 04/30/2003 1:08:54 PM PDT by Polycarp
Dear Colleague:
The battle raging over the President's AIDS bill comes down to Condoms vs. Abstinence. The "have sex, just use a condom" approach has been tried for twenty years and has failed-spectacularly-to halt the epidemic. The only failsafe method of preventing the sexual spread of HIV is to encourage abstinence before marriage and faithfulness after marriage. This is what abstinence-and abstinence alone-does.
Steve Mosher President
PRI Weekly Briefing 30 April 2003 Vol. 5/ No. 14
Condoms vs. Abstinence By Steven W. Mosher
The AIDS virus is transmitted from one person to another by contact with an infected person's body fluids. In Africa, the Caribbean, and many parts of the world heterosexual sex was, until recently, believed to be the primary means of transmission.(1) This is why barrier methods of birth control, chiefly the condom, were early pressed into service to combat the epidemic.
Over the past twenty years, HIV/AIDS prevention programs have centered on the large-scale distribution of condoms. These have been combined with "safe sex" propaganda campaigns aimed at convincing the public that putting a layer of latex between sexual partners can guarantee protection against infection by the HIV/AIDS virus. Population Services International (PSI), a USAID-funded group, uses aggressive and ubiquitous advertising campaigns to flood the media with a pro-condom message. These "safe sex" campaigns involve, to use PSI's own martial language, a constant "barrage of radio spots and films shown on television, in cinema halls, and on [PSI's] fleet of mobile film vans" all extolling the perfect protection afforded by condom usage.(2)
Over the course of the nineties, USAID shipped approximately 5 billion condoms abroad.(3) Billions of others came from the UN Population Fund, the UK's Overseas Development Agency, and other providers. Yet, despite this flood of condoms into the developing world, the rate of HIV/AIDS infection continued to grow at startling rates. The number of victims increased one thousand-fold, from just over 40 thousand in 1990 to over 40 million in 2000. Why is this?
One answer may be suggested by a review of the scientific evidence on condom effectiveness conducted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).(4) Citing a study by Davis and Weller, NIH postulated that condoms, if consistently and properly used, provide an 85% reduction in HIV/AIDS transmission risk.(5) While no one would deny that this reduction in risk is significant, it is far from being the perfect protection promised by the "safe sex" propaganda funded by USAID. Even paved with condoms, the road to promiscuity still leads to death.
The failure of condoms to provide perfect protection against HIV/AIDS is also suggested by studies of condom use for the prevention of pregnancy. Approximately 3% of couples who reported using condoms consistently and correctly (considered "perfect use") are estimated to experience an unintended pregnancy during the first year of use.(6) If sperm can find their way around the latex barrier, then so, presumably, can the AIDS virus.
To further complicate matters, the presumed protection resulting from using a condom may lead to behavioral changes that completely negate the protection. For example, an individual who believes that consistent and correct use of condoms provides near-absolute protection against HIV/AIDS may engage in recklessly promiscuous behavior that they would otherwise avoid. Why? Because they have been led to believe that, by practicing "safe sex," they are immune from contracting the disease. In this way, the rate of HIV/AIDS transmission may not be reduced at all by the "safe sex" message, but actually increase over time.
A recent article in The Lancet, a premier British medical journal, suggested that a condom-based approach, by creating a false sense of security on the part of users, had not only failed to stop the spread of AIDS, but had actually exacerbated the problem. The authors drew a parallel with the seat belt law, which was projected to dramatically decrease the number of traffic fatalities. Instead, the number of deaths remained roughly the same, as drivers took risks they previously would have avoided because they felt safer. (7)
Perhaps this is one of the reasons why, despite massive shipments of condoms overseas, the rate of HIV/AIDS infections continues to grow.
Only one African nation has successfully combated the scourge of AIDS. Uganda owes its success in combating AIDS, most health experts agree, chiefly to abstinence. "Uganda's outstanding success really has American heads turning," said Dr. Milton Amayun, World Vision's HIV/AIDS international program representative. "Experts in the U.S. are starting to see the value of teaching people to limit their sexual relationships within the context of marriage."(8)
Abstinence, not condoms, is the key to stopping the AIDS epidemic in Africa.
Endnotes
(1) There is new evidence suggesting that medical transmission is responsible for most HIV/AIDS in Africa. See PRI Weekly Briefing, "Are Africans Promiscuous Unto Death?" 5:12, 24 April 2003. (2) PSI Profile: Social Marketing and communications for health, 2-sided flyer on "Bringing Mass Media to Rural Populations through Mobile Video Vans," November 1994. (3) USAID, USAID Highlights, 6:4, 1989; USAID, Population, Health and Nutrition Projects Database; note: the volume of USAID condoms shipped overseas is likely smaller than that of the UN Population Fund, which boasts of being the largest international supplier of condoms. Also cited in PRI Review, 13:1, January-February 2003, p. 4. (4) "Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention," National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 20 July 2001. (5) Davis, K.R. and Weller, S. C., "The Effectiveness of Condoms in Reducing Heterosexual Transmission of HIV," Family Planning Perspectives 1999, 31(6):272-279. (6) Trussell, J., "Contraceptive Efficacy," In Hatcher, R.A., Et al., (Eds.) Contraceptive Technology, 1998. Chapter 31:779-844, 17th Revised Ed., Ardent Media, New York, NY. Cited in "Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention," p. 10. (7) John Richens, et al., "Condoms and seat belts: the parallels and the lessons," The Lancet, Vol. 355, 29 January 2000. (8) Uganda's "ABC" Approach to AIDS Proven Effective http://www.worldvision.org/worldvision/pr.nsf/stable/update_uganda_52902.
© 2003 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted. Redistribute widely. Credit required. ____________________________ To subscribe to the Weekly Briefing, send an email to: Mail to: JOIN-PRI@Pluto.Sparklist.Com. To unsubscribe from the Weekly Briefing, please follow the directions at the bottom of this message.
_____________________________ The Population Research Institute is committed to ending human rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of "overpopulation."
____________________________ Population Research Institute 1190 Progress Drive, Suite 2D P.O. Box 1559 Front Royal, VA 22630 USA http://www.pop.org Media Contact: Scott Weinberg 540-622-5240, ext. 209
--- You are currently subscribed to pri as: bjkdig@floodcity.net To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-pri-5629054L@pluto.sparklist.com
Abstinence is the only answer, for HPV.
But nobody wants to talk about it............
I wonder why?
Citing a study by Davis and Weller, NIH postulated that condoms, if consistently and properly used, provide an 85% reduction in HIV/AIDS transmission risk.Thought you might like the link to the study: Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention (pdf). Here's the pertinent part:
Among participants who reported always using condoms, the summary estimate of HIV/AIDS incidence from the twelve studies was 0.9 seroconversion per 100 person years. Among those who reported never using condoms, the summary estimate of HIV/AIDS incidence from the seven studies was 6.7 seroconversions per 100 person years. Overall, Davis and Weller estimated that condoms provided an 85% reduction in HIV/AIDS transmission risk when infection rates were compared in always versus never users.Telling people that if they have sex, they're safer using condoms is like telling them that if they play Russian Roulette, they're safer using one bullet instead of five. Such nonsense.
BTW, what does "100 person years" mean?
I wonder how many advocates of condom use would have sexual intercourse with someone that they knew had AIDS, as long as they were able to use a condom. I'd say that the number is vanishingly small, which tends to prove the case for abstinence.
I have thought this for a long time. Think about it. Just as junkies pass the AIDS virus through needle use by several people, so do hospitals and clinics pass the virus by their lax sterilization procedures when it comes to needles. They use a needle several times before going to the trouble of putting in the machine to be sterilized, or they may not even have a machine, and just wait to wash them.
Don't get me wrong, I think pushing abstinence and monogamy will be extremely helpful. But I think drilling those folks in sound sanitary practices will do just about as much to reduce the volume of AIDS cases.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
