Skip to comments.
Anti-war protesters receive maximum penalty for halting warship
Spacedaily ^
| 4/29/03
| AFP
Posted on 04/29/2003 9:39:48 PM PDT by Brett66
Anti-war protesters receive maximum penalty for halting warship
SYDNEY (AFP) Apr 30, 2003
Eight anti-war activists were fined 440 dollars (270 US) each Wednesday over a spectacular protest that delayed the departure of an Australian warship bound for the Iraq war.
Sydney's Downing Centre Local Court Magistrate Ross Pogson imposed the maximum penalty but said it was inadequate.
The eight were part of a Greenpeace protest in which two activists clambered up the sides of the frigate HMAS Sydney and unfurled a "no-war" banner in a demonstration that brought the vessel to a halt on April 9.
The two managed to attach themselves to the hull of the warship with climbing equipment, embarrassing Australian authorities.
All eight, Geoffrey Nimmo, Nicholas Clyde, Megan Ivory, Jan Madsen, Logan Petley, Sarah Roberts, Philip Wollam and Michael Rosato, pleaded guilty to wilfully preventing the free passage of a vessel.
Nimmo read a statement to the court on behalf of the group saying he and some of the others had served in the armed forces and the action had targeted the government, not the troops.
"Our action was based on respect for international law over and above unilateral action," Nimmo told the court.
Defence barrister Grant Brady said all activists were full-time workers trained in either climbing or diving so there was no safety risk in the protest.
"Each and every defendant believed firmly ... that the actions of the Australian government in sending troops to Iraq was an action that was without UN sanction and therefore illegal," Brady said.
Magistrate Pogson said the protesters may well have had significant community support for their cause but their actions would have been offensive to any fair-minded person.
He said the maximum penalty was inadequate because it did not convey the seriousness of the offence.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiwar; australia; greenpeace; hmassydney; iraq; losers; protesters
1
posted on
04/29/2003 9:39:48 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Brett66
I read about this protest..very hurtful to their troops. The fine is a slap on the wrist.
2
posted on
04/29/2003 9:47:22 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Brett66
Did they protest when Clinton was the one doing the bombing??????????????
3
posted on
04/29/2003 9:55:20 PM PDT
by
buffyt
(Can you say President Hillary, Mistress of Darkness? Me Neither!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Brett66
The eight were part of a Greenpeace protest in which two activists clambered up the sides of the frigate HMAS Sydney and unfurled a "no-war" banner in a demonstration that brought the vessel to a halt on April 9.
Personally speaking I think the ship should have just kept on going.
4
posted on
04/29/2003 9:56:53 PM PDT
by
Valin
(Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
To: Brett66
I wish someone would explain to these people what 'unilateral' means.
5
posted on
04/29/2003 10:13:36 PM PDT
by
ArmedGeek
To: Brett66
"Each and every defendant believed firmly ... that the actions of the Australian government in sending troops to Iraq was an action that was without UN sanction and therefore illegal," Did Greenpeace get UN sanction to do this? No? Then, what they did was therefore illegal.
6
posted on
04/29/2003 10:16:35 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
To: Valin
Looks to me like the navy missed a good practice opportunity.
7
posted on
04/29/2003 10:22:23 PM PDT
by
tdscpa
To: Brett66
It wouldn't bode well for anti-war groups to stop a warship in the US! Big no no. Rest assured they wouldn't get just a slap on the wrist like they did in Australia.
8
posted on
04/29/2003 10:30:19 PM PDT
by
sasportas
To: MEG33
Australia simply refuses to punish crime anymore. That and disarming their citizenry has caused their crime rate to skyrocket in recent years.
9
posted on
04/29/2003 11:04:23 PM PDT
by
Bonaparte
To: Bonaparte
I was keeping up with Australia pretty well before the war..There are some real left wingers writing nonsense..The Australian has a more centrist stance.Lots of starry eyed ideas floating around,though.
10
posted on
04/29/2003 11:09:54 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: sasportas
It wouldn't bode well for anti-war groups to stop a warship in the US! Big no no. Rest assured they wouldn't get just a slap on the wrist like they did in Australia.
if it happened here there would be alot of bruised protesters you know just as well as i that our service men and women dont take crap like this lightly
To: Brett66
The eight were part of a Greenpeace protest in which two activists clambered up the sides of the frigate HMAS Sydney and unfurled a "no-war" banner in a demonstration that brought the vessel to a halt on April 9. Digger squids should have used fire hoses to wash away that filth, an if that proved insufficient, some Steyer-AUGs. (5.56 bullpup assault rifle) or if like our ships they aren't equiped with the latest small arms, FN/FALs.
12
posted on
04/29/2003 11:24:55 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: El Gato
Can someone tell me why Greenpeace does not get sued for using some of the funds they raise (most people would think they are helping the environment by sending money to them) to fund activities that have nothing to do with the environment?
To: MEG33
To: Bonaparte
Thanks!
15
posted on
04/30/2003 1:04:59 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
Well, publishing their names will help. I'm sure the guys will want to look them up when they come home from the war.
To: Brett66
It certainly should be embarrassing to Australia that these clowns were able to get away with that stunt.
And they did get away with it because of the ridiculous penalty and because they were allowed to use the courtroom as a bully pulpit to justify their atrocious actions.
17
posted on
04/30/2003 1:28:49 AM PDT
by
WaterDragon
(Only America has the moral authority and the resolve to lead the world in the 21st Century.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson