Take another hit off your bong, and get back to me when you are able to put together some semblence of a dissent.
I don't smoke pot. Again, why the hostility? We don't have previous issues, and I've tried to treat you with respect on this thread.
you fail to respond to what I have to say because you can't.
I've responded to you plenty. Look, we're not going to agree on the merits and/or lack therof of libertarianism, but realize that it is because of my libertarian/constitutionalist side that, believe it or not, we agree on the unconstitutionality of the Supreme Court getting involved in this case in the first place.
Spelling and "reading comprehension" complaints are a trademark of the unimaginative.
How droll, 'p9'. -- You're the twit that started this teapot tempest with your "reading comprehension" complaint about HTML.
Take another hit off your bong, and get back to me when you are able to put together some semblence of a dissent.
More "unimaginative" twit-talk. Gotta love it.
Like that pseudointellectual tompaine, you fail to respond to what I have to say because you can't. Changing the subject won't make you right.
Yep, JMC, -- I think you nailed this guy as someone thats carrying around a grudge about "intellectual" libertarians. He's been bested more than once, fer sure; -- although like you, I have no recollection of ever posting to him before today..
Weird. - Must be just another pitiful creep freeper that is overeasily insulted.