Replies

Spelling and "reading comprehension" complaints are a trademark of the unimaginative.

I know. I was just busting your ba@&s a bit.

Take another hit off your bong, and get back to me when you are able to put together some semblence of a dissent.

I don't smoke pot. Again, why the hostility? We don't have previous issues, and I've tried to treat you with respect on this thread.

you fail to respond to what I have to say because you can't.

I've responded to you plenty. Look, we're not going to agree on the merits and/or lack therof of libertarianism, but realize that it is because of my libertarian/constitutionalist side that, believe it or not, we agree on the unconstitutionality of the Supreme Court getting involved in this case in the first place.

I am hostile with you, because I have run out of patience for libertarians who are the scourge of conservativism. I don't know your personal politics, but to me libertarianism stands for PRO-ABORTION, PRO-DRUGS, PROiISOLATIONISM, ANTI-RELIGION, and PRO-IMMORALITY. If you are not against those things, you are for them. I don't have time or compassion for people that think that way. Now, I appreciate your civil tone, and I apologize for offending you in the past, but when you choose to naively ally yourself with the Gay Rights movement out of a misguided sense of universal liberty, expect more of the same. This issue is not about gay men having the right to do what they want in the privacy of their own homes. I understand the libertarian urge to see things in such black and white terms, but there is much more at stake here. Which is why Santorum is being crucified for things he didn't really say. I see that you have attracted a few really dumb libertarians to this thread now. Ones that I have dealt with in the past. Why don't the whole lot of you go back to your nutty WOD threads and give the gay right sympathies a break?