Still knee-deep in homophobia

The Arizona Republic ^ | Apr. 29, 2003 | O. Ricardo Pimentel

[Khepera]

Jesus is Lord and the Lord says homosexuality is an abomination.

"I" believe other religions are false and do not care what happens to them for not accepting Jesus.

[presidio9]

Do me the favor of ignoring my posts in the future, and I will do the same for you. I find your observations very tiresome.

[presidio9]

Posting that all non-Christian faiths lead to Hell is a classic troll.

[Khepera]

I dont have to quote versus you find out for your self.

Personally I just don't like homosexuals and cant wait to call the law on them. Hell I'll make up a crime as long as they arrest them. </jokng>

[tpaine]

See 378.

[presidio9]

See 378.

From said post:

your more obvious errors of fact must be countered.

This is exactly my point. It would be ok if you actually did this. But you don't counter anything. You seem uninterested or incapable of countering any point. At all. It's like this is a game for you. You have nothing to say, but you are trying to score minor debating points. And you fail even at that. Is it because you are downright stupid, or because you are playing some juvenile game? I honestly don't which is worse, but I feel sorry for you.

Do us both the favor of ignoring my posts in the future, and I will do the same for you. I find your observations very tiresome.

[MEGoody]

"Most rational people adhere to the philosophy of "It is not my business to tell other people what to do."

Any law that exists is telling other people what to do. I would presume that you would support laws against murder.

It is a load of crap when someone says "I myself would never have an abortion, but it's not my business to tell other people what to do." That is like saying "I myself would never shoot my 9 year old son in the head, but it is not my business to tell other people what to do."

[MEGoody]

"You said Jesus. Not St. Paul. Not Leviticus. Where did Jesus address the issue?"

Okay, so you do not believe Jesus is God, the bible is God's word or both. Either way, citing scripture to someone who refuses to believe what God has said is a pointless exercise.

[presidio9]

Cast not your pearls before swine...

[tpaine]

presidio9
Most adhere to the philosophy of "I myself would never have an abortion, but it is not my business to tell other people what to do."
That is a pile of crap.
-P9-



Most rational people adhere to the philosophy of "It is not my business to tell other people what to do."
A pile of crap may have other ideas.
358 tpaine


Any law that exists is telling other people what to do. I would presume that you would support laws against murder. It is a load of crap when someone says "I myself would never have an abortion, but it's not my business to tell other people what to do." That is like saying "I myself would never shoot my 9 year old son in the head, but it is not my business to tell other people what to do."
389 -goody-




The 'traditional moralists' here at FR simply ~do not~ believe in the principles of a free private life, liberty under due process of law, or the unfettered pursuit of private property & "happiness".

Nope, we must abide by "the tenets of traditional morality that have proven themselves to be effective over centuries", -- those that they proclaim to be absolute.


---- "The utterly insufferable arrogance of power, and the need for it, is an absolute fact of the human condition. -- Nothing can be done about it. - Just as the poor shall always be with us, so shall we have these infinitely shrewd imbeciles who live to lay down their version of 'the law' to others."
-unknown-

[tpaine]

See 378, or take it to the backroom.

[Kuksool]

{Okay, so you do not believe Jesus is God, the bible is God's word or both. Either way, citing scripture to someone who refuses to believe what God has said is a pointless exercise.}

Well said.

[tpaine]

Either way, citing the constitution to someone who refuses to believe what 'We the People' have said is a pointless exercise.

The principle behind your thought cuts two ways, Kuk...

[Dolphy]

I know there are some who want to create anti-sodomy laws. I don't. I don't see any particular need to try to remove them, but I would not fight that. I don't want to see the definition of marriage, which has existed for millennia, changed. I think we should be honest when speaking about homoerotic attraction that it is a sign of mental illness, but I am not ready to call for outlawing it.

Fair enough. I don't agree that homoerotic behavior is a mental illness but that doesn't mean I agree that the definition of marriage should be changed.

[presidio9]

Cut back on your drug use and learn how to referrence an earlier post. Nobody knows what the heck you are talking about junkie.

[presidio9]

Either way, citing the constitution to someone who refuses to believe what 'We the People' have said is a pointless exercise.

Pay no attention to him. He is too stupid to understand what the words "promote the general welfare" mean. As a matter of fact, I'd be suprised to learn that he's ever gotten past the first three words. "We the People" is hardly a libertarian referrence, now is it? I guess that's what you get when you go through life stoned.

[tpaine]

See 378, or take it to the backroom.

[presidio9]

Save your self-righteousness. I'm not the one currently engaged in THREE unrelated long-winded flame wars right now. Apparently you make a habit of this behavior. Seek help.