Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recess Appointments - Going in With Their Eyes Open
El Rushbo

Posted on 04/29/2003 12:36:43 PM PDT by hardhead

Recess appointment of judges that leftists hate.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appointment; democratstonewall; eyesopen; judicial; judiciary; recess; temporary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
I was just listening to El Rushbo's closing comments and he was explaining a proposed strategy of the President making recess appointments of judges that the democreeps hate; for instance, Robert Bork. Appointing Judge Bork to say, the Washington DC Appeals Court, the judge knowing full well that he would only be there a copuple of months. It would make the democraps go beserk, knowing there wasn't a thing they could do about it. Then broker an agreement that all recess appointments of judgeships would cease if the demolefties would agree to let ALL appointments that have been approved in committee come up for a floor vote. If I am duplicating someone's post, please delete. I thought that this was worth bring up because it is sooo brilliant. What a way to use the talents of retired or never-confirmed conservative judges. Think what could happen if cases that the demons were extremely interested in came before their courts.
1 posted on 04/29/2003 12:36:43 PM PDT by hardhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hardhead
Love it !
2 posted on 04/29/2003 12:38:25 PM PDT by Taxbilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
"knowing full well that he would only be there a copuple of months"

I thought that recess appointments lasted until the next Congress meets or something like that, not just a couple of months.
3 posted on 04/29/2003 12:42:37 PM PDT by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
Dumb and dumber and hardly something President Bush would consider.
4 posted on 04/29/2003 12:42:37 PM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
Other than the fact I can't spell ;o), a couple of months may not be an apt description; maybe up to a year. I am only quoting Rush.
5 posted on 04/29/2003 12:46:14 PM PDT by hardhead (Hate Speech = Anything leftists do not agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
I too heard the same proposal.

In my humble opinion, Libs will never allow Bork to get a recess appointment. They are probably in negotiations with the Whitehouse now.

Just the mention of this subject on Rush's show today and heard by all of the "ears" of the Left, probably is causing a such national need of underware changes.

6 posted on 04/29/2003 12:47:43 PM PDT by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zerosix
I think Judge Bork was only named as an example, but how can anyone be so sure that this could not happen? Is appointment and confirmation of judges only the province of the left? Are Judges Owen, Pickering, and Estrada not qualified? Don't you think that if an agreement (a precedent) were set, that it would ensure future nominations at least get a floor vote?
7 posted on 04/29/2003 12:50:27 PM PDT by hardhead (Hate Speech = Anything leftists do not agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
Alright!
8 posted on 04/29/2003 12:51:29 PM PDT by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
I still like the ol'Dashole bit that NO monies will be given to the airlines that Tommy's wife lobbies for if these nominations aren't just put to the floor but PASSED.
9 posted on 04/29/2003 12:55:59 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
If you think these foaming at the mouth RATS are
loud now, they will get rabies if POTUS does this.
I had to turn Sean off because he kept playing
hitlery's foaming at the mouth speech.
10 posted on 04/29/2003 12:59:16 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Rush agrees with me 98.5 % of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
That's hilarious.

How about Patricia Cleary from Ohio?
How about Dick Armey?

Who else can we put on our Dream Team?
11 posted on 04/29/2003 1:00:05 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
"knowing full well that he would only be there a copuple of months"

I thought that recess appointments lasted until the next Congress meets or something like that, not just a couple of months.

Remember, Clinton had some guy in a "civil rights" position for at least a couple years. No reason we couldn't do the same.

12 posted on 04/29/2003 1:05:03 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
The problem is that there have been MANY recesses since Bush went into office and he hasn't done it yet. BTW, I think that a recess appointment term is for one year at which point the appointee may be reappointed by the president, let go, or affirmed or rejected by the Senate.
13 posted on 04/29/2003 1:05:23 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zerosix
In my humble opinion, Libs will never allow Bork to get a recess appointment.

There isn't much they can do about it except to never recess.

14 posted on 04/29/2003 1:09:14 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hardhead
Judges decide constitutional issues.

There is a conflict between the Senate's power to make its own rules and the President's power to appoint judges, seeing they need the Senate's advice and consent.

The Supreme Court would decide such a case if it were brought to them. It would need a republican decision. In the 5-4 court, Sandra O'Conner is the sore point. If she were to retire and an immediate recess appointment were made, then that court could be presented with a crisis caused by the Senate majority leader. Frist could hold a vote of the majority Republicans saying the constitution does not require a super-majority for their approval; only a majority. That would be a crisis for the Supremes to decide.

O'Conner out of the picture and another strict constructionist and you might just win a decision that says the Senate cannot block votes on presidential appointments using supermajority requirements.

Or you could lose.

15 posted on 04/29/2003 1:45:05 PM PDT by RockBassCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
My understanding is that a recess appointment lasts until either the position is filled (ie Bush's nominations go through) or Bush's term is up. In other words, they are in until the senate knocks off the filibuster bovine feces or 2004. And even in 2004, Bush could reappoint them through 2008.
16 posted on 04/29/2003 1:48:55 PM PDT by blanknoone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RJL
Remember, Clinton had some guy in a "civil rights" position for at least a couple years. No reason we couldn't do the same.


Actually Bill Lann Lee received a recess appointment during the August recess of 2000 just months before the Clinton Presidency was to end. He served the early time from 1997 as 'acting Assistant Attorney General'. The recess appt removed the 'acting' from his title and gave him another notch for his resume.....

Any judicial recess appointment would expire with the end of the 108th Congress unless confirmed by the Senate...
17 posted on 04/29/2003 2:13:31 PM PDT by deport (Beware of Idiots bearing gifts.... One maybe the FR Joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
And even in 2004, Bush could reappoint them through 2008.
Article II, Section 2, US Constitution...

Any recess appt expires at the end of the congress session in which it was made...

18 posted on 04/29/2003 2:20:43 PM PDT by deport (Beware of Idiots bearing gifts.... One maybe the FR Joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
"knowing full well that he would only be there a copuple of months" I thought that recess appointments lasted until the next Congress meets or something like that, not just a couple of months

That's probably what a copuple is.(humor)

19 posted on 04/29/2003 2:42:07 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deport
My bad...but he could just keep reappointing them every year.
20 posted on 04/29/2003 2:43:41 PM PDT by blanknoone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson