Explain, please, what "Creo" has to do with science. And re-read my post.
Please define what a "non-fully formed specie" would look like.
Where do you find this in my post? Nevermind. You supposed scientists are answering the questions, not me, since your position is that Darwinism is science.
Where do you find this in my post?
As he made perfectly clear to everyone who was paying attention, he "found" this in your post where you declared that "fully formed" (your phrase) species appear in the fossil record. This begs the question of how exactly you have defined "fully formed", and thus he asks what a *not* "fully formed" species might look like.
It wasn't that hard to make the connection, so sorry you couldn't keep up.
Nevermind.
In other words, "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain".
Sorry, too late, we already noticed you dodging a request for you to demonstrate that you even understand your own claims.