*Not* fully formed species placemarker
Where do you find this in my post?
As he made perfectly clear to everyone who was paying attention, he "found" this in your post where you declared that "fully formed" (your phrase) species appear in the fossil record. This begs the question of how exactly you have defined "fully formed", and thus he asks what a *not* "fully formed" species might look like.
It wasn't that hard to make the connection, so sorry you couldn't keep up.
Nevermind.
In other words, "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain".
Sorry, too late, we already noticed you dodging a request for you to demonstrate that you even understand your own claims.
So, we have a snotty wordsmith. Welcome to the "debate", Ich. Species exhibit stability, stasis, not change. This is a fact. They are fully formed and strive mightily to remain that way, virtually unchanged, sometimes for millions of years. Did you read my post? Sorry yourself -- wordplay does not substitute for facts.