Posted on 04/27/2003 12:13:46 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
Kathleen Willey: Predator Clinton Will Strike Again
Sexgate accuser Kathleen Willey warned Saturday that ex-President Bill Clinton is a serial sexual abuser who will likely assault other unsuspecting women even in his new role advising world leaders on how best to undermine the Bush administration.
Asked if she regarded Clinton as a sexual predator, Willey told WABC Radio's Monica Crowley, "Absolutely, without a doubt."
"And you know what? It's going to happen again," insisted the key impeachment witness. "As sure as I'm sitting here, it's going to happen again, you'll see."
Willey warned women who come into contact with the ex-president that they should "remain vigilant because it hasn't stopped."
The former White House volunteer cited a recent report that Clinton had "sexually molested" a female Air Force steward in the galley of Air Force One in 1997, an incident detailed by Lt. Col. Robert Patterson in a new book about his days serving as custodian of the White House nuclear football during the 1990s.
The military woman was described as "very upset" over the attack and demanded that the commander-in-chief apologize.
"If he's attacking a woman in the galley of Air Force One after what had happened with me, tell me what's going to make him stop now," said Willey, who alleged five years ago that Clinton sexually molested her in 1993 in a room off the Oval Office.
Another flight attendant, Chrystine Zercher, who worked on Clinton's 1992 campaign plane, has also alleged that she was groped by the then-candidate. Zercher added that Clinton would invite her to join him in the plane's lavatory as he stood in the doorway with his pants open.
Willey also criticized New York Sen. Hillary Clinton for countenancing her husband's predatory behavior, complaining that the former first lady had orchestrated White House attacks against women who spoke out about the president's unwanted advances.
"This is a woman who's proud to be a Democratic woman and [for] equal rights and is so against sexual harassment of women," Willey noted. "To see her attack people like me was just appalling. It really was."
Willey made her prediction that Clinton would strike again just a day after the 25th anniversary of the day Arkansas businesswoman Juanita Broaddrick says she was raped by the ex-president.
In fact, Cathy, I'm waiting for him to come to town to speak. I'd love to sneak in (I refuse to pay to hear his drivel) just for the opportunity to stand up, turn around, and be there with my back to him for a very long time. Then, I dream of having many friends with me so we could all do it. But after about 15 minutes, we'd all walk out on his speech - making much noise - huffing, clicking our tongues, and wagging our fingers at him on the way out.
Great quote! You should use it as a tagline. LOL!
Which reminds me...I live too close to Washington to leave its draconian tentacles out of my calculations.
BTW, if he really does 'offend' again like Willey predicts, I hope he does it in a foreign country where they shoot first and ask questions later!
Another reason why paradigmatically Clinton should be viewed as a cult leader. The people who continued to follow Clinton degraded and debased themselves. Keep in mind, Kathleen Willey started out as a Clinton supporter and follower.
If you watch shameless Clinton defenders very carefully (Susan Estrich is a good example), they get a goofy grin on their face as they defend the indefensible and morally grotesque. A rape suddenly becomes just a casual peccadillo or fraternity prank. They laugh and giggle as they shrug off the NUMEROUS accusers. Now, a normal person doesn't behave that way. But zombified, hypnotized cultists do.
Not infrequentlty, cult leaders promote the abandonment of conventional sexual morality. It's a very powerful manipulative tool. There are people who have deep issues involving authority figures and the suspension of normal rules (antinomianism) is a psychologically potent method for manipulating them. So why did liberals laugh and giggle when confronted with rape allegations against Clinton? This is not the functioning of a normal mind. But you do find it among people in cults. The Manson girls laughed and giggled when confronted with allegations about Manson. Very similar phenomenon. The Clinton followers, psychologically speaking, were cultists.
Asimov didn't deal with that aspect at all -- his characters sex lifes, as I recollect, are not covered. Maybe that's why he liked robots. Easier to keep sex out of the story.
Sex is such a potent force. Ask any flower. I don't see many amoeba bouquets sent to friends. Amoeba: boring. Sexual plants: interesting. Exactly how does male relate to that completely strange yet similar entity -- his female mate? And vice versa of course. The whole dynamic of the universe seems wrapped up in it.
I can go on and on ... fermions are male, bosons are female -- the love dance of the atom!
The giggling and laughter by Clinton defenders during the discussions of the rape and molestation allegations was weird. Displaying improper, inappropriate, and bizarre emotional reactions is certainly the sign of someone in some state of psychological inbalance. Since it seems logical that many Clinton defenders (at least in part) shared some of his interest in sexual deviancy, just connect the dots. They were just in too deep. Manson and other cult leaders would get their followers hooked on kinky sex and drugs. This hits at deep layers of the psyche.
Giggling, laughter, strange grins, glazed zombified eyes, blank stares, displays of inappropriate emotion, lack of sympathy for victims, paranoid anger at accusers.... It was a strange carnival - the Clinton years. This capacity of his defenders and followers to defend him no matter what is worrisome. There are out there among the liberal fever swamps some very disturbed and mixed-up, confused people who are willing to abridge the ethical code and the rule of law to defend a leader who exercises some type of charismatic charm over them. This is not a healthy sign. Whatever ideological and social engineering agenda it is that they desire, they are willing to abandon civilized standards of decency to an extreme degree in order to attain this agenda. Clinton degraded and debased his followers like any other pathological cult leader. We saw a a really bizarre type of liberalism manifest itself. Very unsettling. The zombified cult followers are almost more frightening than the Clinton monster itself.
Especially when you consider that they are out there running around like a headless chicken looking for a head, just like the one they perceive that they have lost.
Well, especially for someone who takes liberalism very seriously as their personal cause, you would think that they would desire a high quality of leadership in the person presented to represent liberalism for the whole country. It's hard to figure why such people would want, say, Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton to fill that role. It certainly would have been a disaster if someone like Bob Packwood had been a presidential figure for the Republicans.
So for people who defended Bill Clinton and supported him enthusiastically, you do have to ask what kind of people you are dealing with here. Have standards of personal morality, behavior, and decorum really sunk that low? Has modern counter-culture really jaded people that much? Why would people be so attracted to Bill Clinton that they would automatically go into denial as woman after woman came forward with tales of his alleged rapes, aggressive molestations, and threats?
You wouldn't think that they would be laughing and giggling if they were discussing a rape which didn't have anything to do with Clinton. So why the goofy responses when such accusations were directed at Clinton? It would seem like you have to conclude that there was something goofy and a little kooky about their cultish devotion to the creep. The nervous laughter may have something to do with the cultish psychology which bound them to such a leader. There was indeed something quite absurdly irrational about the zombified defenders of Bill Clinton. Clinton seemed to offer them a strange recipe of lewd, Dionysian rebellion and licentiousness combined with vague socialist grandiosity, an almost religious self-righteousness, and a paranoid Manichaean zeal for struggling against "the vast right-wing conspiracy." It was OK if Clinton had raped a few gals along the way since he was at heart trying to keep everyone safe from Rush Limbaugh. That's one strange brew.
Thats an apt description. I have always referred to him as the stuff that a snail leaves when it oozes away.
Or perhaps like that French puppet dog ("Triumph") on Late Night with Conan O'Brien which tries to mount everything that moves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.