Posted on 04/27/2003 11:10:36 AM PDT by Inyokern
Creators Syndicate
|
|
Oh, good. It looks as though we're going to have as big a fight over postwar plans for Iraq as we did over the war itself. Just what we need -- more of everybody being at everybody else's throat.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who seems prepared to run the world, favors one Ahmed Chalabi of the Iraqi National Congress, an exile-emigre group, as postwar leader (read figurehead-puppet). Chalabi is bitterly opposed by both the State Department and the CIA.
According to Knight-Ridder's Jonathan Landay, American military planes flew Chalabi and 700 troops, the newly named "First Battalion of Free Iraqi Forces," into Nasiriyah on Sunday to be integrated into Gen. Tommy Franks' command.
Landay reports: "Senior administration officials said that Chalabi had had difficulty recruiting enough forces to go into southern Iraq and may have tapped the discredited Badr Brigade, an Iranian-backed Shiite Muslim group, to get his 700 soldiers." Think how happy the Iraqis will be to see some detachment from their old enemy Iran.
Landay also reports: "It was information provided by Chalabi that led Rumsfeld and [Paul] Wolfowitz to a prewar belief that Iraqis would rise up and welcome the invading coalition with open arms, that the Republican Guard would surrender in droves and the government of Saddam Hussein would crumble in a matter of days."
This gets better. Chalabi has been in exile for four decades, and in 1992 he was convicted on multiple counts of embezzlement of hundreds of millions of dollars in Jordan after the failure of his bank there. He was sentenced to 22 years in prison. He escaped from Jordan, reportedly in the trunk of a car, and wound up in London.
The Iraqi National Congress has received millions in American aid money, but the accounting has been very poor (a familiar story), and quite a bit of the money is unaccounted for.
The Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz choice for "viceroy designate" of Iraq is Gen. Jay Garner, head of the Pentagon's Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance. Garner is a retired military man with links to both the international arms industry and a Jewish lobby group.
After retiring from the Army, Garner became president of SY Coleman, a defense contractor specializing in military defense technology. He is currently on leave of absence from the company.
The problem of Garner's alleged Zionist sympathies is also causing talk: He visited Israel as the guest of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and signed a statement in October 2000 blaming the Palestinian Authority for the violence after the collapse of peace talks and praising the "remarkable restraint" of the Israeli army.
The third member of the triumvirate that Rumsfeld & Co. want to run Iraq is former CIA chief James Woolsey, who said last week that Iraq is the opening of the "Fourth World War" (counting the Cold War as III) and that America's enemies include the religious rulers in Iran, states like Syria and Islamic terrorist groups.
So we've got a crook, a Zionist and an old spy who thinks this is the beginning of WW IV set to run Iraq. How lucky can the Iraqis get? Is this what we thought we were fighting for?
According to David Sanger's analysis in The New York Times, "Some hawks in the administration are convinced that Iraq will serve as a cautionary example of what can happen to other states that refuse to abandon their programs to build weapons of mass destruction, an argument that John Bolton, the undersecretary of state for arms control, has made several times in recent speeches."
The administration's more pragmatic wing fears that the war's lesson will be just the opposite: that the best way to avoid American military action is to build a fearsome arsenal quickly and make the cost of conflict too high for Washington.
Were it even true...TOUGH!
And this is a bad thing because.....?
"I hate Bush."
Of course, repeated columns that said just those three words would become even more boring than the ones that these two harrigans actually write. So the message has to be dressed up, some.
Therefore, each article becomes, "I distrust BLANK who is doing BLANK. And, by the way, BLANK is associated with Bush in the following manner -- BLANK."
The sad part is there are a few million Americans who take trash and twaddle like this seriously. Ivans is a fine writer, when she sticks to subjects she knows and can discuss without prejudice, namely the pecadillos of Texas state legislators. Dowd is never a good writer, she is merely a dictionary plus an attitude. "There's no there, there."
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, now up on UPI and FR, "All-American Arrogance"
Ah Yid iz a mentch vos geher tzum Yiddishen folk.
Oh Horrors! Speak no more of his crimes! I bet he recites the Lords Prayer on Sunday and thinks homosexuality is a sin too--the ba$tard!
I wish.
My point exactly. I was curious why you used it. Perhaps to attribute this attitude to Frau Molly?
"I hate Bush."
Oh, I don't know. I think Molly likes a little bush every now and then.
"Yid" is the Yiddish word for "Jew" and in that context it is not derogatory in the slightest. It doesn't bother me to hear that word and I use it myself all the time. It is usually the left-wing, assimilated, non-religious Yids who get all bent out of shape at being called "Yid."
Ivans is not a columnist nor a journalist, she is a propagandist. The only thing she leaves in question is how many words deep in her dross does she say, "...and, the Republcans did it."
She is so worthless in terms of providing insightful analysis or a thought provoking perspective that I have to believe there is some other reason that the Startlegram keeps her on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.