Skip to comments.
Aziz admits Saddam may be dead
Scotland on Sunday ^
| April 27, 2003
| TOM CURTIS
Posted on 04/26/2003 6:10:13 PM PDT by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: Fred Mertz
.....I concluded that all bets were off......
Me too.American Military intelligence had a good reason for both hits and one day those reasons will be divulged. It would help us a lot if the names of those suspected of being there were released.
There is a deck of 55 cards, of which 13 are now in custody. There were reportedly 14 in the latter strike and an unknown number in the first. It is a pretty safe bet to say that half of the 55 are off the street.
61
posted on
04/27/2003 5:45:41 AM PDT
by
bert
(Don't Panic !)
To: The Great Satan; Travis McGee
"Shock and Awe" was real and it worked.
It WAS NOT designed to shock and awe me or you.
It WAS NOT designed to shock and awe the media.
It WAS designed to shock and awe the Iraqi regime.
It did that, and it was very effective.
The opposition had vitually zero military leadership, communication,
or coordination after the first few seconds of the war.
Oh, and by the way, Saddam is dead.
62
posted on
04/27/2003 6:07:48 AM PDT
by
error99
To: The Boston Stranger
If Aziz was a "mole", why would the coalition start the rumor that he had been captured, killed, etc., at the beginning of the war? Later reports said that those rumors were started to make him show himself so he could be tracked, perhaps to help locate Saddam.
I agree that Aziz seems the type to sell out his boss. I'm just not sure his involvement in the early days of the war make sense if he had.
To: MadIvan
I have a question. Have I missed it or has there not been any reports of finding and entering the main bunker that the Swiss built for Saddam?
If I missed it, could someone point me to that thread?
To: Howlin
I'm not sure Aziz is in any position to be caught in a lie, do you? I think if Aziz knowing provides false information, he may be turned over to the Iraqis for their brand of justice. That plus the confisction of any money his family might have to live on. The only thing he has to sell is truth.
65
posted on
04/27/2003 7:23:57 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: Allan
It was clear to me that Bush believes Saddam was hit the first night.I watched Tom Brokaw's interview. It *is* clear that President Bush believes he got Saddam the first night. It is also clear that he trusts the intelligence on the ground in Iraq that provided the information on Saddam's whereabouts.
Bush does not parse his words like a lawyer.
He doesn't. He's uncomplicated and straightforward. It's a waste of time to try and analyze what he says.
66
posted on
04/27/2003 9:09:04 AM PDT
by
keri
To: MadIvan
I looked up your bio sheet and realize I should done that earlier. There was a "Mad Ivan" that was in denial about the 9 million or so Germans that were were either killed outright or by being ethnicaly cleansed from Pomerania (now western Poland), Prussia, Sudetenland, etc.
I think that he may have used a space or used lower case in his post name.
67
posted on
04/27/2003 9:46:49 AM PDT
by
rightofrush
(Not only Rush, but Buchanan as well.)
To: rightofrush
Well I don't know about any other Mad Ivans - I thought I was the only one. Disquieting that I'm not. ;)
Regards, Ivan
68
posted on
04/27/2003 10:03:59 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: The Boston Stranger
Did I see something today about aziz maybe having worked as a 'mole'? I could believe that of him. Considering that president Bush has made a similar statement recently about Saddam getting killed the first night, I would think that strengthens the case that Aziz was the informant. And Aziz being alive, thus not likely at that bombed meeting, is another factor.
To: Publicus
he never said he never SPOKE or otherwise communicated with Saddam- directly or indirectly. He only said he had not SEEN him Exactly what my dh said. Aziz's statement was carefully worded.
Personally, I'd rather be optimistic. It won't change the circumstances of Saddam's whereabouts, but it makes me feel a lot better to think he's dead.
To: Allan
I'm not sure exactly what I heard. I suspect you heard a different interview.
71
posted on
04/27/2003 9:52:48 PM PDT
by
Mitchell
To: justshutupandtakeit; BenLurkin; MadIvan
"Belarus official does not deny DEBKAfiles revelation of Saddam Husseins flight to Minsk. In answer to question, Belarus Presidents spokesperson Natalia Pietkiewicz said only: We have no information of Saddam Husseins presence in Belarus."
-From today's DEBKAfile.
72
posted on
04/28/2003 8:58:24 PM PDT
by
rightofrush
(Not only Rush, but Buchanan as well.)
To: MadIvan
73
posted on
04/28/2003 8:59:26 PM PDT
by
Spruce
To: rightofrush
If "one has no information" about something then it is hard to deny it.
If he were in Belarus we would have him within days, if not hours. Did he come in with Chinese troops?
74
posted on
04/29/2003 6:45:40 AM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson