Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dixie Chicks launch full-frontal attack - "not...standing their ground...pushing it even farther"
The Dallas Morning News ^ | April 25, 2003 | By TOM MAURSTAD / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 04/26/2003 11:35:34 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

Dixie Chicks launch full-frontal attack


04/25/2003

By TOM MAURSTAD / The Dallas Morning News

You're a platinum-selling country star riding a record-setting wave of popularity. But a few weeks ago, you made a comment during a concert that has angered and alienated your core constituency.

What do you do?

If you're the Dixie Chicks, you pose naked on the cover of Entertainment Weekly.

This latest move is likely to turn up the flames on a controversy that has been burning for more than a month. That's a feeling echoed by program directors at the area's two leading country-music stations, neither of which has played a Dixie Chicks' song since early March when singer Natalie Maines told a London audience she was ashamed that President Bush is from Texas.

Under the headline "Dixie Chicks Come Clean," the May 2 issue shows the country-music trio posed in a pyramid of bare skin. Across their torsos are painted phrases – "Traitors," "Saddam's Angels," "Shut Up!" – drawn from the volumes of letters and e-mails the band has received.

Also Online
Video: Local radio station weighs in on whether to continue Chicks ban
In the tradition of mainstream magazines featuring nude celebrities on their covers (Janet Jackson on Rolling Stone, Demi Moore on Vanity Fair), the Dixie Chicks are positioned in such a way – a hand here, a leg there – that no private parts are exposed. Such attention to the technicalities of nudity does nothing to diminish the provocative nature of the image.

(And in answer to the first question this photograph will spark, an Entertainment Weekly spokeswoman asserts: "That's them, their bodies. There were no computer tricks, no airbrushing.")

With the women's unflinching stares into the camera and the blurb's promise of "Country's Controversial Superstars Take on Their Critics," the cover is striking, even defiant.

"We wanted to show the absurdity of the extreme names people have been calling us," fiddle player Martie Maguire says in the story.

The Dixie Chicks ... stirring up more controversy with their upcoming <I> Entertainment Weekly </I> cover photo.
AP
The Dixie Chicks ... stirring up more controversy with their upcoming Entertainment Weekly cover photo.

The attention-getting cover story comes on the heels of the group's interview this week with Diane Sawyer on ABC's Primetime Thursday . Publicity campaigns undertaken by celebrities who have fallen from their public's graces are nothing new. But traditionally the celebrity is practicing some form of damage control – a high-profile mea culpa or by going silent on the subject.

But not the Dixie Chicks. Far from throwing water on the fire, they seem to be throwing gasoline.

"What this reflects is that the old damage control just doesn't work anymore because everybody knows the playbook," says Robert Thompson, a professor of pop culture and television at Syracuse University. "Everybody is so media savvy now that if you apologize, people just dismiss it as what your consultant told you to say."

A band representative on Thursday said the singers had no comment on the cover photograph or the interview. But others in country music certainly have.

"I don't know that they'll ever be as big with the country audience as they used to or as important to the country audience as they used to be," says Paul Williams, program director of KPLX-FM (99.5) "The Wolf."

"At first I thought it was a joke," says Ted Stecker, program director for KSCS-FM (96.3), of the Entertainment Weekly cover. "I don't think it's a good move for them right now.

Unlike other outspoken celebrities, such as rocker Sheryl Crow or activist director Michael Moore, whose anti-war comments have generally been applauded by their fans, the Dixie Chicks' comments play against country music's bedrock fans.

"You could write off the comment that started all this as something said in the excitement of the moment," says Leo Braudy, author of The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and its History. "But what's going on now is the result of calculation.

"It's a pretty striking strategy. Rather than backing down and appearing on the cover waving a flag or dressed in military uniforms, they are not just standing their ground, they're pushing it even farther."

Staff critic Mario Tarradell contributed to this report.

E-mail tmaurstad@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/latestnews/stories/042503dnovechicks.18b99.html


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-166 next last
To: annyokie
"No lie! I said that pic was photoshopped the first time I saw it. That or Natalie has lost about 40 pounds in ten days!"

You can lose that weight if you're on a steady diet of crow. And not Cheryl Crow.

61 posted on 04/26/2003 12:32:35 PM PDT by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Now that the jury has seen the exhibits, it's time for some witnesses to take the stand. First up is Jennifer Harper of the Washington Times:
    "Former admirers called her "Fat Nat"..."
Thankyou, no further questions. I next call Mr Blog of Anger Mismanagement --
    "She's just a short, fat chick with a grating voice who pretends she can play the guitar."
Thankyou, no further questions.

Yet another witness. I now call Larry the Cable Guy.

    "Maybe if this 2 ton Dixie chick spent more time at a salad bar than she did criticizing’ other peoples music she wouldn’t have to wear size 32 wranglers."
And lastly, I call an expert witness,
    "I don't know if "trio" is the right word. Two normal girls plus Natalie make a quartet."
I rest my case.
62 posted on 04/26/2003 12:35:27 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Not BTT. ...,,,Bump,,,, but BUT to the top
63 posted on 04/26/2003 12:39:57 PM PDT by spokeshave ( against dead wood (albore) Frogs & Rats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Sorry to disappoint here, but the LIBERAL evil crowd over at HELLywood are already hailing them as heroes and will go out on a limb to launch them in a different light! In other words, because of their stupid actions they will become EXTREMELY beloved by the liberals and become Famous! In these times the more you kick against what is noble and right the more they get rewarded, JUST ASK MONICA and the RAPIST!! We live in sorry times :( I don't believe the PRIXIES CHICKS will fall into the abyss forever!
64 posted on 04/26/2003 12:39:59 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
You're all jealous, that's all. So they look like one in a million! (Wait! Should it be 3 in a million? Or 3 in three million?) Well, that's why they're famous, and not use guys with your pockmarked faces, scars, sailor tattoos and sagging boobs. You all hoid:

Entertainment Weekly spokeswoman asserts: "That's them, their bodies. There were no computer tricks, no airbrushing."

Would the paper of record Entertainment Weekly ever lie to us?

65 posted on 04/26/2003 12:40:53 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Registered has a wicked sense of quick wit. I'd love to share a couple of beers with him! :D
66 posted on 04/26/2003 12:41:01 PM PDT by Rate_Determining_Step (US Military - Draining the Swamp of Terrorism since 2001!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Someone needs to ask them this queastion.Are you doing as good a job with your carear as President Bush is with his?
67 posted on 04/26/2003 12:43:57 PM PDT by Blessed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
hehe! I love it. Thanks !
68 posted on 04/26/2003 12:45:25 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
EW is a mag that is VERY FREQUENTLY in doctor's and dentist offices waiting rooms, especially Pediatric Docs..how are the DOCS gonna explain this soft PORN cover to the "mommies" who have brought their little darlings in for the sniffles?

DUMB and DUMBER, and DUMBEST move Blixie Chicken Strippers.

I watched our local Memphis ABC 24 News after the interview, which I DID NOT watch. Maines said and I quote "I'm ASHAMED OF OUR FANS".

They say they are ashamed of a good, decent and GOD fearing man, who only has the good of ALL America in mind, yet they STRIP NAKED and aren't ashamed some 5 year old might see it when they go to the doctors? Doesn't compute, is illogical which is typical of LIBERAL air heads.

69 posted on 04/26/2003 12:46:36 PM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
. . . "Is that really you, Natalie?" here is Exhibit #1 --

hehe ! Way to go ! Thanks.

70 posted on 04/26/2003 12:48:37 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thanks for the heads up!
71 posted on 04/26/2003 12:49:12 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Chris Baker Poll
Is this Natalie Maines' REAL body?
 Yes.  5%
 No  11%
 No bleeping way!  84%

72 posted on 04/26/2003 12:49:24 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
"That's exactly what I believe they are trying to do. Their first response was to try to make this go away. It wouldn't. So after the non-apology apologies predictably fell flat, they shifted to an attitude calculated to appeal to the left. I foresee a change in their style, repertoire and concert venue."

I agree with you. Look for a ,"Madonna", type video next with all pop music. Been along time since, I've seen a fiddler in a rock band. I think they are digging a deeper hole for C/W fans. DumbA$$ girls. Look at all the money they threw away, just to make a point.

73 posted on 04/26/2003 12:53:19 PM PDT by auggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
>>It seems to be some sort of feminine logic I guess. Say something stupid, and instead of defending it with logic, get nekkid!

Hey, first of all, as many times as I'VE put my foot in my mouth and made a bad situation worse, I've never stooped to getting naked to get out of it. Not even for DOING something stupid have I had to pay for it with less than perfumed stockings, a garterbelt, and bustier, much less have my head cut off and pasted on some skinny model's body with no tan lines.

74 posted on 04/26/2003 12:53:23 PM PDT by Wondervixen (Ask for her by name--Accept no substitutes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"At first I thought it was a joke," says Ted Stecker, program director for KSCS-FM (96.3), of the Entertainment Weekly cover.

It is, Ted. A baaaad joke.

The Chicks weren't content with developing a reputation as mere unpatriotic airheads; They seem to have a pathological craving to become total laughing stocks as well.

75 posted on 04/26/2003 12:53:24 PM PDT by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Natalie Maines must have been touched up in the picture to cover up the stretch marks.
76 posted on 04/26/2003 12:53:34 PM PDT by rimmont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Blix's Chicks are more comical than their mentor!
77 posted on 04/26/2003 12:53:56 PM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Such attention to the technicalities of nudity does nothing to diminish the provocative nature of the image.

That's for sure.

It's possible they're auditioning for their new career as porno stars, in anticipation of the wane of their singing career.

78 posted on 04/26/2003 12:56:39 PM PDT by GretchenEE (We export freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
For what it's worth, Adrian Pasdar, Natalie's husband, is of Iranian descent!

I read that on a FR thread not long ago from a bio on her website.

g

79 posted on 04/26/2003 12:58:04 PM PDT by Geezerette (... but young at heart!-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
hehe ! Great pic.
80 posted on 04/26/2003 1:03:55 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson