Skip to comments.
Source: Army secretary resigns on Rumsfeld's demand
CNN.com ^
| 4/25/03
Posted on 04/25/2003 9:39:08 PM PDT by Hipixs
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (CNN) --Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld demanded U.S. Army Secretary Tom White step down Friday, a senior Pentagon official said, a move that follows two years of contention between the two.
The official said Rumsfeld called White into his office and demanded his resignation, which White provided.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: army; crusader; rumsfeld; rumsfeldpinglist; thomaswhite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-258 next last
To: Fred Mertz
I think Rumsfield is smart and a great Secretary of Defense. He has stepped on some toes and doesn't suffer fools gladly.
41
posted on
04/25/2003 10:39:09 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: justshe
White was not only over his head, but anyone who was as politically inept as to allow the 'Crusader memo' to get traced right back to him has no business at that level.
I worked as a Systems Engineer on Crusader as my civilian job (I'm part time Guard). Believe me, it deserved to be cancelled on mismanagement and smoke and mirrors alone.
To: Fred Mertz
Fred, you're starting to sound like someone who might have had his toes stepped on during some of these reforms.
43
posted on
04/25/2003 10:40:02 PM PDT
by
Amelia
(Tag line? What tag line?)
To: MEG33
I agree with you; but he's still an idiot.
To: Amelia
Watch what he says.
He says nothing.
You're intelligent; watch and learn.
To: Hipixs
"Asked whether he would seek White's resignation, Rumsfeld replied, "No, my goodness, no.""
That would make rummy a two-faced jackass. A typical politician who smiles at your face and kicks you in the ass. An untrustworthy jerk.
To: Fred Mertz
Explain idiot as it pertains to Rummy.
47
posted on
04/25/2003 10:44:20 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: justshe
"after this brilliant campaign, "
We clobberd an enemy that, for the most part, refused to fight. That is a "brilliant" victory??
To: Fred Mertz
you have not proven YOUR point however....you just piggy backed anothers w/ insults...history, like 38 days ago, proves the idiot here
To: MEG33
See #46.
To: PatrioticAmerican
That would make rummy a two-faced jackass. A typical politician who smiles at your face and kicks you in the ass. An untrustworthy jerk. Notice he said that a year ago. Something might have changed. Or, the "unnamed sources" might be mistaken.
51
posted on
04/25/2003 10:46:27 PM PDT
by
Amelia
(Tag line? What tag line?)
To: MEG33
MEG,
Refer above, you are going to go around in circles, banging your head against a wall. This isn't a serious intellectually based point.
52
posted on
04/25/2003 10:46:52 PM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
("As long as it takes...No. That's the answer to your question. As long as it takes." GWB)
To: Fred Mertz
Rummy is a show hound. How many executives can spend two hours each day giving press briefings on national TV?
To: TexKat
The White resignation.
54
posted on
04/25/2003 10:48:22 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: PatrioticAmerican
A typical politician who smiles at your face and kicks you in the ass. If he smiles at you in front of the cameras, and press,then kicks you in the ass in private, you should thank him. It certainly could be worse....
A leader congratulates his men in public and chastises them in private.
To: chookter
No claim here to be any sort of analyst of weapons systems, but one question just screams to be asked:
'In what sort of even marginally possible war scenario in the next decade would heavy artillery be either a useful or a decisive factor?'
Perhaps my imagination is too limited, but I can't conceive of such a scenario, and certainly not of one in which the next generation of UAVs and related devices could not achieve the same results, at least as efficiently, and a d*mned sight less expensively.
56
posted on
04/25/2003 10:49:19 PM PDT
by
SAJ
To: PatrioticAmerican
His morning meetings are before 7 a.m.
I rest my case.
To: PatrioticAmerican
refused to fight. That is a "brilliant" victoryFrankly that is a sick stab in the back of the hard working men that not only organized this so well that you can think it was so easy, but fought it on the ground against non convential forces. Make your point to the 127 dead's family members.
58
posted on
04/25/2003 10:50:27 PM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
("As long as it takes...No. That's the answer to your question. As long as it takes." GWB)
To: PatrioticAmerican
Oh yes, the Sec. of DEFENSE, during a war , shouldn't ever hold daily press briefings...in your oh so " brilliant " ( NOT ! ) estimation. Right, okay, ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ...ROTFLMSO
To: SAJ
As I said:
"I worked as a Systems Engineer on Crusader as my civilian job (I'm part time Guard). Believe me, it deserved to be cancelled on mismanagement and smoke and mirrors alone."
Indirect Fire is, and always has been, the #1 killer on the battlefield--the difference is that the fires are no longer necessarily Field Artillery because of the great expanses of the new battlespace.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-258 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson