[JohnGalt]

http://100777.com/nwo/104a.htm


Typical Horowitz style hit piece.

Why doesn't he write an article linking Republicans stand against Affirmative Action and the white supremacists?

[Uncle Miltie]

"Why doesn't he write an article linking Republicans stand against Affirmative Action and the white supremacists?"

A: Because it doesn't exist.

His article primarily points out that among the malefactors of the anti-war movement, anti-Semites should be added to the list. "No War for Israel" sort of tips their hand. The rest is documentation.

[arthurus]

Typical Horowitz

Hardly. Horowitz makes all his connections and is more sparing in his use of adjectives. BJ says "Nazi" but doesn't show it. The only actual connection he takes beyond assertion is David Duke. He dsoesn't even show that the guy is having any effect on the lefty orgs, just says he is trying. Horowitz is much more meticulous and doesn't use adjectives to substitute for sources. BJ argues in the mode of a leftist ranter, no facts and a lot of volume and frothing.

[Constantine XIII]

?!

Uh, what exactly did he say that was wrong? o_O

[Poohbah]

What's the relevance of an article about Jonathan Pollard--who is rightfully incarcerated--to this topic?

[Cachelot]

Typical Horowitz style hit piece.

And if you're a reader of that premier "Libertarian" septictank, LibertyForum, you know that every word is true.

Do you feel hit?