Hardly. Horowitz makes all his connections and is more sparing in his use of adjectives. BJ says "Nazi" but doesn't show it. The only actual connection he takes beyond assertion is David Duke. He dsoesn't even show that the guy is having any effect on the lefty orgs, just says he is trying. Horowitz is much more meticulous and doesn't use adjectives to substitute for sources. BJ argues in the mode of a leftist ranter, no facts and a lot of volume and frothing.