Skip to comments.
Latest Windows XP patch can slow down PCs
Computerworld ^
| April 23, 2003
| Joris Evers
Posted on 04/23/2003 10:31:14 AM PDT by Timesink
Latest Windows XP patch can slow down PCs
By Joris Evers, IDG News Service
APRIL 23, 2003Microsoft Corp.'s latest security patch can cause computers running Windows XP to slow down to a crawl, affected users say.
Windows XP can take up to 10 seconds to start an application after installation of the patch released April 16 with Security Bulletin MS03-013, users wrote in dozens of postings on several online discussion boards. Removing the patch brings system speed back to normal, according to those users.
Microsoft is aware of the issue and is investigating, said Stephen Toulouse, a security program manager at Microsoft's security response center.
"We have been made aware of some isolated cases of customers experiencing performance issues after applying the patch," he said, referring to the online reports. No customers have called Microsoft's help desk with the problem, according to Toulouse.
The patch, which Microsoft calls Hotfix Q811493, was distributed via Microsoft's security Web site and the automatic Windows Update service. It fixes a security flaw in the Windows kernel, the core of the Windows operating system. The vulnerability is rated "important" by Microsoft, one notch below the highest level in the vendor's severity rating scheme.
The flaw could allow an attacker to raise his privilege level on a vulnerable system. However, to exploit the flaw, an attacker must be able to log onto a system, either at the computer or via a terminal connection, mitigating the risk.
Users offering online advice suggested that home users experiencing system slowdowns remove the patch because corporate environments with terminal servers and client systems accessed by multiple users are most at risk. Microsoft, however, urged all customers to apply the patch and to call the Microsoft help desk if there are any performance problems afterwards, Toulouse said.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: hotfixq811493; microsoft; techindex; windows; windowsxp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
To: skeeter
My version of XP Pro takes between five & ten MINUTES to boot. Interesting. One of the few nods I'd give XP over Win2K is the time it takes to boot. From POST to logon, I've always found XP to be faster. Having said that, are you talking about actual boot time, or the item(s) in your "Startup" folder loading? There is a difference.
And today was a good day...
81
posted on
04/26/2003 8:55:36 PM PDT
by
rdb3
(It ain't nuthin' to a ballah, baby...)
To: longtermmemmory
I have the exact same problem. If you discover a cure, will you ping me please?
82
posted on
04/26/2003 8:56:51 PM PDT
by
justshe
(Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor.)
To: TomServo
You're HD = Your HD....damn fat fingers...
83
posted on
04/26/2003 8:57:00 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: TomServo
Oh - that post - that's a joke - goes back to the first post where I said my 266 with 16 megs of memory locked up on this XP patch.
My real machine is an Athlon XP 2400. I've got 512M DDR onboard already, seriously thinking about talking to our wholesaler about another 512M. Running with 140G on the harddrives, but looking at a deal he's offering on a 120G Seagate.
84
posted on
04/26/2003 8:59:10 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(Dieses sieht wie ein Job nach Nothosen aus!)
To: TomServo
You're HD = Your HD....damn fat fingers... No, that wasn't your "fat fingers." You must have a sixth on your right hand, right? ;-)
And today was a good day...
85
posted on
04/26/2003 9:02:50 PM PDT
by
rdb3
(It ain't nuthin' to a ballah, baby...)
To: Tennessee_Bob
lol - my reply was a joke, too..
My machine is only a Athalon 1.3, 200 gig HD, 1 gig RAM..thinking about ramping up the speed later this year and gettin' a new MOBO..server is only an 800 mhz, 512 RAM and 130 gig HD space...can hardly wait for Christmas.. ;-)
86
posted on
04/26/2003 9:04:13 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: Tennessee_Bob
...but looking at a deal he's offering on a 120G Seagate. With an 8MB buffer? If so, do it!
And today was a good day...
87
posted on
04/26/2003 9:04:52 PM PDT
by
rdb3
(It ain't nuthin' to a ballah, baby...)
To: rdb3
Yep - it's got the 8 meg buffer on it - the price is right, it's in stock, it's just a matter of getting myself convinced to do it.
88
posted on
04/26/2003 9:07:13 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(Dieses sieht wie ein Job nach Nothosen aus!)
To: Tennessee_Bob
Getting "convinced?" Surely you jest! If the pennies for this piece are few, you know what you must do! After this, find yourself a 36.8GB, 15,000RPM Seagate SCSI in a used harddrive bin that some nitwit mistakenly labeled $30. Now only if I can get my home network setup on gigcards for this little. Life would be suhweet.
No, I'm not related to Johnnie Cochran...
And today was a good day...
89
posted on
04/26/2003 9:12:50 PM PDT
by
rdb3
(It ain't nuthin' to a ballah, baby...)
To: TomServo
Oh, ok - didn't know if you'd seen the original posts or what. heh heh heh...I'm running an ultra-compression system on that 300 megger....any more compression and it'll turn into a quantum singularity - and I hate when that happens. Ever tried defragging a drive where a portion of the data resides in an unknown dimension? Geeze!
90
posted on
04/26/2003 9:13:02 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(Dieses sieht wie ein Job nach Nothosen aus!)
To: Billy_bob_bob
Gosh Billy_bob_bob,I admire your humility.
91
posted on
04/26/2003 9:13:46 PM PDT
by
fatima
(Go Karen,Look at all these's prayers.For all our troops,we love you.)
To: Tennessee_Bob
I'd kill myself before I ran any compression. A real pain in the ass...
92
posted on
04/26/2003 9:15:49 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: TomServo
Disk compression was the big joke when I was tech support at Toshiba. Owners would call in and say "I ran this compression program..." and we'd interupt and ask if they'd lost access to the drives. The answer was yes - and we'd ask "Got your recovery CD?" Not worth the time or the effort.
93
posted on
04/26/2003 9:17:14 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(Dieses sieht wie ein Job nach Nothosen aus!)
To: Tennessee_Bob
BTW - all my 100 gig HD's I got on sale for $89.00 a pop...heh heh...
94
posted on
04/26/2003 9:17:18 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: Tennessee_Bob
"Got your recovery CD?" Not worth the time or the effort.LOL - yup...personally, I Ghost to my server..
95
posted on
04/26/2003 9:18:02 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: TomServo
I'm looking at this 120 for $128.
96
posted on
04/26/2003 9:19:19 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(Dieses sieht wie ein Job nach Nothosen aus!)
To: Tennessee_Bob
With an 8 meg cache - it's still a damned good deal...
97
posted on
04/26/2003 9:20:04 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: Jhoffa_
I did attrib to remove a trogan file once that had protected itself. The woman thought I was Bill frik-king Gates for knowing how to do that in DOS. My wife recently impressed her Office Teenage Computer Geek with "diskcopy a: a:"...
98
posted on
04/27/2003 1:19:34 AM PDT
by
backhoe
To: GunRunner
No. You have to do a fresh install for Home. I suggest backing all your data up. Keep the Pro - if you have a laptop that's what you want to be using anyway. I had so many crashes with my laptop I installed a copy of Roxio Goback. Everything runs like a charm now.
99
posted on
04/27/2003 1:28:21 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Timesink
I'm sure we'll just get another patch.
100
posted on
04/27/2003 1:31:07 AM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Iraq - Free At Last!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson