Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest Windows XP patch can slow down PCs
Computerworld ^ | April 23, 2003 | Joris Evers

Posted on 04/23/2003 10:31:14 AM PDT by Timesink

Latest Windows XP patch can slow down PCs

By Joris Evers, IDG News Service
APRIL 23, 2003

Microsoft Corp.'s latest security patch can cause computers running Windows XP to slow down to a crawl, affected users say.

Windows XP can take up to 10 seconds to start an application after installation of the patch released April 16 with Security Bulletin MS03-013, users wrote in dozens of postings on several online discussion boards. Removing the patch brings system speed back to normal, according to those users.

Microsoft is aware of the issue and is investigating, said Stephen Toulouse, a security program manager at Microsoft's security response center.

"We have been made aware of some isolated cases of customers experiencing performance issues after applying the patch," he said, referring to the online reports. No customers have called Microsoft's help desk with the problem, according to Toulouse.

The patch, which Microsoft calls Hotfix Q811493, was distributed via Microsoft's security Web site and the automatic Windows Update service. It fixes a security flaw in the Windows kernel, the core of the Windows operating system. The vulnerability is rated "important" by Microsoft, one notch below the highest level in the vendor's severity rating scheme.

The flaw could allow an attacker to raise his privilege level on a vulnerable system. However, to exploit the flaw, an attacker must be able to log onto a system, either at the computer or via a terminal connection, mitigating the risk.

Users offering online advice suggested that home users experiencing system slowdowns remove the patch because corporate environments with terminal servers and client systems accessed by multiple users are most at risk. Microsoft, however, urged all customers to apply the patch and to call the Microsoft help desk if there are any performance problems afterwards, Toulouse said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: hotfixq811493; microsoft; techindex; windows; windowsxp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: backhoe

LOL!

I love it when the bar goes down.. Instant computer geniuses, one and all.

101 posted on 04/27/2003 8:50:51 AM PDT by Jhoffa_ (Sammy to Frodo: "Get out. Go sleep with one of your whores!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
" ... Windows XP can slow down PCs."

You got that right. I tried switching some 3 year old 500mhz PIIIs to winXP. Sheesh.

So I dumped the whole lot and installed RH9. Now the PCs run fine, and the clients don't have to upgrade to the newest models. Saves about $1000 a seat if you are a business.

Most people use their PCs for brwosing and writing. These recovered machines do this just fine.
102 posted on 04/27/2003 8:56:39 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
No w a y
103 posted on 04/27/2003 9:00:36 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Consort
LOL!

hey!

I'll take what I can get and be thankful!

104 posted on 04/27/2003 9:05:18 AM PDT by Jhoffa_ (Sammy to Frodo: "Get out. Go sleep with one of your whores!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Instant computer geniuses, one and all.

If I recall aright, Josh's comment was an awe-struck "You know DOS?"

105 posted on 04/27/2003 9:41:48 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
If I'm annoying you then I'm doing SOMETHING right!

I knew you were annoying. What I didn't know is that you take pride in being annoying. Add that to the long list of reasons of why Mac users are becoming even more irrelevant as time passes...
106 posted on 04/27/2003 9:44:29 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Ditto, I got Windows 2000 on all my systems. I got XP Pro, but I haven't tried it yet. Should I?
107 posted on 04/27/2003 9:49:28 AM PDT by mrb1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: Bush2000
I don't take pride in being annoying. I take pride in annoying you. Your endless boosterism of all things Microsoft has been noticed by many people around here, and I'm not the only one who is tired of it.
109 posted on 04/27/2003 10:01:41 AM PDT by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: KBtry4-11
Hotfix Q811493, it does slow down your computer.

I just uninstalled it.

I'm running over 800 MHZ RAM, and my computer was very slow.

Start, settings, control panel, add Remove, Q811493 uninstall.

111 posted on 04/27/2003 10:07:11 AM PDT by agincourt1415
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415
I am about to uninstall the hotfix. I just got off a chat with Microsoft and they said they are working on a fix (no estimate of a release date). They further said to either uninstall it or disable my virus software (Mcafee).

I am running XP Pro and am the only one who uses this computer so I think I am safe (but are we ever really safe with Microsoft).
112 posted on 04/27/2003 10:22:38 AM PDT by OC_Steve (Support our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
Your endless boosterism of all things Microsoft has been noticed by many people around here, and I'm not the only one who is tired of it.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Said the endless booster of all things Apple... Dude, you're so full of crap that you can't tell the difference between crap and non-crap anymore...
113 posted on 04/27/2003 11:08:07 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
"My version of XP Pro takes between five & ten MINUTES to boot."

Well, I'd say either you're running a lot of TSR applications (down by the clock), have a slow machine/memory/hard drive, etc. or the software and hardware are misconfigured -or just crappy. A good hard drive definitely helps. XPpro allows for cluster sizes >4Kb, I use a 32Kb cluster size for my 60Gb XP OS drive. My XPpro boots in less than 20 sec.s on a XP2100@1806Mhz/266FSB VIA333/512MB 2700RAM.

5-10 min.s to desktop is ridiculous. Have you defragged lately? Also, do a Start, Run, "chkdsk /f /v /r" and type Y. That'll do a check disk on the next reboot. Takes a while but it's worth it to resolve file errors. If your system is 'good' then try a Google search under "tweak XP pro".

114 posted on 04/27/2003 11:41:03 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Interesting. One of the few nods I'd give XP over Win2K is the time it takes to boot. From POST to logon, I've always found XP to be faster. Having said that, are you talking about actual boot time, or the item(s) in your "Startup" folder loading? There is a difference.

Windows comes up pretty fast, so I assume I don't have a hardware problem.I'm talking about the time it takes to load the items on the task bar.

I've tried several of the suggestions I've been given here, but nothing seems to work. I've been putting off reformatting entirely, but I'm afraid thats next.

115 posted on 04/28/2003 7:03:22 AM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: snooker
Pardon my ignorance - "RH9"? Terminal?

I am always looking for ways to decrease cost and increase reliability for my clients and am not head over heels in love with Macrosoft.
116 posted on 04/28/2003 9:37:23 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (In those days... Every man did that which was right in his own eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
RH9 => Red Hat 9.0, latest release of their consumer product.
117 posted on 04/28/2003 11:57:38 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Windows comes up pretty fast, so I assume I don't have a hardware problem.I'm talking about the time it takes to load the items on the task bar.

Okay, so those are the things in your Startup folder.

And today was a good day...

118 posted on 04/28/2003 3:40:32 PM PDT by rdb3 (It ain't nuthin' to a ballah, baby...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: united1000
(clean out)prefetch folder .......

many thanks for that suggestion. Seems to help. Could you tell me which XP newsletter you get?

119 posted on 04/28/2003 5:49:36 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Sounds like a hoax from Computerwerld. Scaremongering, in other words.
120 posted on 04/28/2003 5:53:11 PM PDT by tuna_battle_slight_return
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson