Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam Skimmed the UN: How the Oil-for-Food program financed Saddam's palaces.
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | Wednesday, April 23, 2003 | By London Times

Posted on 04/23/2003 12:27:54 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Saddam Skimmed the UN
By London Times
London Times | April 23, 2003


KICKBACKS from Iraq’s oil sales have run into billions of dollars because of loopholes in the United Nations Oil-for-Food system designed to feed the Iraqi people.

Diplomats said yesterday that Saddam Hussein’s regime sometimes exacted an illegal surcharge of as much as 55-75 cents (30-45p) a barrel on its daily oil sales of some two million barrels under the programme, although the amount was generally 15-25 cents.

“We thought they were getting at least $500 million a year in illegal kickbacks,” one Western official said.

The money funnelled to Baghdad helped to finance its banned weapons programmes, but it could also have been used to buy influence abroad.

Iraq was able to choose which companies were awarded lucrative contracts to export oil or to import food or other humanitarian supplies.

The main beneficiaries were companies from Saddam’s political protectors at the United Nations, some of them trading companies with little more than a brass plate on the door.

Over the seven years of the Oil-for-Food programme, Russian companies got $7.3 billion of Iraqi business, almost twice as much as firms from any other country. Next on the list of leading trading partners were Egypt, with $4.3 billion; France, with $3.7 billion; and Jordan, the United Arab Emirates and China with $3 billion each.

Diplomats said that British firms won “minimal” business, almost all of it in the health sector, worth a couple of hundred million dollars.

The Oil-for-Food programme began operation in 1996 after Iraq agreed to allow the UN to supervise its oil sales and the purchases of food and medicine it made with the revenue.

All oil contracts have to be approved by the UN sanctions committee, made up of the 15 Security Council members. The money is deposited in a UN escrow account at the Banque Nationale de Paris, where it can be spent to purchase goods approved by the sanctions committee.

Over the years the Security Council lifted any restriction on the amount of oil that Iraq could sell and the oil price rose, sending Baghdad’s oil revenues up to an annual rate of some $20 billion.

During the same period the council progressively lifted sanctions on civilian goods that could be purchased with the oil money. Iraq can buy anything except military equipment, unless it is on a “goods review list” of dual-use items that require specific sanctions committee approval.

The opportunity for siphoning off money from Oil-for-Food business arose because of the difficulty of setting a realistic price for Iraq’s crude.

The oil price is established by UN oil “overseers”, who try to make it track the world market. The contract price must then be approved by the sanctions committee, where any single member can block it.

There were originally three overseers, but the US and Norwegian members quit, leaving only a Russian who was sometimes criticised for setting the price too high. For several years, Russia blocked new replacements. But Moscow eventually relented. Iraq was able to exploit price fluctuations to ensure that the UN-fixed price allowed enough margin for extra profits to be skimmed off.

Britain led a campaign last year to change the UN system to “retroactive pricing,” so that actual, rather than predicted, market conditions were taken into account. The result has been that illegal surcharges were reduced, before the war, to an estimated three to five cents a barrel.

Diplomats also suspect that Iraqi officials profited from trading on the oil markets on inside information from Baghdad's decisions, such as its frequent moves to suspend and resume pumping crude.

The Oil-for-Food programme operates in great secrecy. The sanctions committee meets behind closed doors and details of transactions are not made public.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: annan; iraq; iraqifreedom; kofi; kofiannan; oilforfood; oilforpalaces; un
Wednesday, April 23, 2003

Quote of the Day by aristeides

1 posted on 04/23/2003 12:27:54 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/895857/posts
UN OIL FOR FOOD PROGRAM REPORT (what UN is really raking in) 2/22-28/03
The United Nations ^ | 4/03 | UN
2 posted on 04/23/2003 12:54:07 AM PDT by backhoe ("It's so easy to spend someone else's money..." ( My Dad ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Useless Nations oil for food scam Master list
3 posted on 04/23/2003 5:26:19 AM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GailA
Accodring to the UN audits were conducted. Let's see the records of who did them and when...
4 posted on 04/23/2003 5:27:37 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Yesterday, Rush said that the French were the auditors.
5 posted on 04/23/2003 5:48:41 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hmmmm....look what I found in a search...

November 22 1999

West finds evidence of Iraqi fraud

IRAQ'S President Saddam Hussein is believed to be skimming off hundreds of thousands of pounds a day from the United Nations "oil-for-food" scheme and using the cash to cement his grip on power (James Bone and Michael Theodoulou write). The alleged fraud has been reported by Western envoys and oil experts. "We have some intelligence on some of it - that there is a lot of it going on," a senior Western diplomat said. The US has gone so far as to block UN approval of a number of contracts to sell humanitarian goods to Iraq.

"We have trouble with some companies paying percentages to government officials in Iraq," Peter Burleigh, Deputy US Ambassador to the UN, said. "We go back to those countries in which these companies function and tell them what our problem is." With the price of oil rising rapidly, the five permanent members of the Security Council are now discussing an entirely new oversight system.

Source

So...the UN has known about this since 1999 and has done NOTHING? Interesting...
6 posted on 04/23/2003 6:14:29 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Yesterday, Rush said that the French were the auditors.

Could be true...they are on the current board...

The present members of the Board of Auditors are as follows:

· Chairman of the Philippine Commission on Audit -- present term expires 30 June 2008

· Auditor General of the Republic of South Africa -- present term expires 30 June 2006

· First President of the Court of Accounts of France -- present term expires 30 June 2004

United Nations Board of Auditors

The above website states that "The Board allocates and rotates the audit work among its members". External Audits of UN programs conducted by France include:

o United Nations Peace-keeping Operations (UNPKO)

o United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)

o United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)

o United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund (UNJSPF)

o International Trade Centre (ITC)

o United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP)

o International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

o United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR)

o United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

o United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)

o United Nations Compensation Commission (UNCCC)

External UN Auditors

If I remember correctly, the oil for food program falls under peace-keeping missions.

7 posted on 04/23/2003 6:55:08 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: randita
Oh, brother! No wonder France wants us out of Iraq (smile)!
8 posted on 04/23/2003 8:08:57 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Probably internal audits......which we know will not reveal any graft or corruption.
9 posted on 04/23/2003 12:12:08 PM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
think Saddam skimmed as much as the UN itself did?
Why do you think the UN wanted Saddam to remain in power
He PAID off....
10 posted on 07/11/2003 7:41:09 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson