"I have long fought to make sure that doctors and patients, not insurance companies and not the Kansas Legislature, make decisions regarding an individual's health care procedures," she wrote. Another one of those "devout Catholic politicians" we've grown so accustomed to.
1 posted on
04/22/2003 11:06:31 AM PDT by
madprof98
To: madprof98
So, the safe portion of "safe and legal" is optional. It's nice to see that they won't let health and safety get it the way of a "women's safety and health" issue.
To: madprof98
Lovely.
3 posted on
04/22/2003 11:16:40 AM PDT by
axel f
To: madprof98
Yeah, Kansas doesn't let my hairstylist operate without oversight nor the lady at the mall who pierces ears get by without big brother checking regularly but regulate abortion industry . . . nah, not necessary.
The Dental Hygenists cannot clean my teeth without government oversight but perform a partial-birth abortion - no problem.
No double standard here.
4 posted on
04/22/2003 11:24:40 AM PDT by
zerosix
To: AdA$tra; alfa6; ALS; amarok; Angelus Errare; axel f; aynrandfreak; beGlad; bjhutch; Bobbisox; ...
Hey, we elected The Hitlery clone for our gov., I still cannot believe it. This is just the beginning. She also has vetoed, for her trial lawyer buddies, a bill that would have helped tourism in Kansas similar to what Colorado has as far a riding horses and other agriclulture based tourism.
PING Kansas
9 posted on
04/22/2003 11:36:37 AM PDT by
jonefab
To: madprof98
I worked very hard to defeat her but failed. Even my own family "spit in my face" and voted for this anti-life b&tch.
19 posted on
04/22/2003 12:47:14 PM PDT by
Renatus
To: madprof98
make decisions regarding an individual's health care procedures," she wrote. Abortion has about as much to do with health care as does ear-peircing.
33 posted on
04/24/2003 4:49:24 AM PDT by
bimbo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson