To: madprof98
Yeah, Kansas doesn't let my hairstylist operate without oversight nor the lady at the mall who pierces ears get by without big brother checking regularly but regulate abortion industry . . . nah, not necessary.
The Dental Hygenists cannot clean my teeth without government oversight but perform a partial-birth abortion - no problem.
No double standard here.
4 posted on
04/22/2003 11:24:40 AM PDT by
zerosix
To: zerosix
You make a very good point. This woman's veto is to serve a constituency she doesn't want to rile up ... it has nothing to do with gov't oversight of health facilities or abortion to her, just a way to keep fires from popping up when /if she took a ,oral or principled stance on legislation. She's a despicable ... oh, never mind. Her ilk are the reason this holocaust has gone on for so long and slaughtered so many.
5 posted on
04/22/2003 11:32:18 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: zerosix
How do you keep yourself from getting discouraged? I just had a nasty exchange (on the thread about NOW backing off their statements on the Peterson case) with someone whose heart was closed to the idea of human life as sacred.
7 posted on
04/22/2003 11:34:53 AM PDT by
A-teamMom
To: zerosix
This guvner is the worst. She operates Kansas like Sodomy ran Iraq after the first bombs fell.
She's a clueless twit and so far has failed in everything she's done.
Her idea of "paying down the loss of tax revenue", includes gambling and other activites of the same moral ilk. In fact, she seems to be very into anything that is immoral.
She just vetoed a bill that would have prevented the use of porn in colleges as a teaching aid.
Our only hope is that the bible belters in this state wake up before the next election.
31 posted on
04/23/2003 11:45:55 PM PDT by
ALS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson