Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay weddings would boost tourism, state report says
WTNH-TV, New Haven ^ | April 21, 2003 | AP

Posted on 04/22/2003 10:48:00 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough

(Hartford-AP, Apr. 21, 2003 8:03 PM) _ Same-sex marriage could boost tourism in Connecticut by bringing couples seeking to wed.

That's according to a study by the state Office of Legislative Research and reported yesterday by The New York Times.

The study found that same-sex civil unions have helped tourism in Vermont and could do the same for Connecticut.

Civil unions in Vermont are legal. But an effort to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples and establish a domestic registry system was rejected April Ninth in the Connecticut General Assembly's Judiciary Committee.

The state's Office of Fiscal Analysis estimated that a civil-union law would draw about eight thousand tourists in the first year to participate in ceremonies.

The Vermont Tourism Data Center does not figure profits from ceremonies involving same-sex unions. Authors of Connecticut's report used estimates from Vermont innkeepers and added and multiplied those numbers to calculate a corresponding impact on Connecticut.

The report says tourism would be boosted by nearly ten million dollars in lodging and related spending for same-sex wedding ceremonies.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut; US: Maine; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Rhode Island; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: barf; connecticut; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; samesexcouples; samesexmarriage; tourism

1 posted on 04/22/2003 10:48:00 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Same-sex marriage could boost tourism in Connecticut by bringing couples seeking to wed.

So would legalized child protitution....

2 posted on 04/22/2003 10:48:56 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
People going to see the freak shows?
3 posted on 04/22/2003 10:52:55 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Good point AR. Child prostitution comprises something like 5% of the GDP of Thailand. Now that's a tourism policy. /sarcasm
4 posted on 04/22/2003 10:55:48 AM PDT by HumanaeVitae (Tolerance is a necessary evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Speaking of which,how is the tourism in Vermont?
5 posted on 04/22/2003 10:56:33 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Or they could build a Colosseum...
6 posted on 04/22/2003 10:57:08 AM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Notice no name for authorship or reference to the original article?????

More created news.
7 posted on 04/22/2003 10:59:15 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Same-sex marriage could boost tourism in Connecticut by bringing couples seeking to wed.

And if you set out enough cow patties, a bunch of flies will come. The only trouble is trying to shoo them away once they decide they "like it here".

8 posted on 04/22/2003 11:05:05 AM PDT by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Can these people really be this stupid or is this just a lame attempt to justify the unjustifyable?

The Vermont Tourism Data Center does not figure profits from ceremonies involving same-sex unions. Authors of Connecticut's report used estimates from Vermont innkeepers and added and multiplied those numbers to calculate a corresponding impact on Connecticut.

What a lame-brained way to calculate economic impact. They completely disregard the rest of the economy (let alone just the rest of the tourism side of the economy).

Three very real variables left out:

1) The fact that many same-sex couples RAN to Vermont to take advantage of a unique law. Future projections are not likely to match the past.

2) The economic impact of conservative-minded families NOT coming to the state and those who decided to move as a result of their idiocy.

3) The demographic of same-sex couples still wanting find a place for their union will have to be SHARED with Vermont. At best, CT should plan for no more than half of the "economic impact" they assumed for VT.

9 posted on 04/22/2003 11:08:20 AM PDT by pgyanke (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
4) The costs associated with this lifestyle. See the problems San Francisco has with AIDS and other STDs.
10 posted on 04/22/2003 11:10:42 AM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Sick. . .
11 posted on 04/22/2003 11:33:28 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Export this to Iraq
12 posted on 04/22/2003 11:46:28 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; Beacon Falls
Same-sex marriage could boost tourism in Connecticut by bringing couples seeking to wed.

So would legalized child pro(s)titution....

No kidding. Glad I'm out'a connectthedots.

FMCDH

13 posted on 04/22/2003 11:47:11 AM PDT by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
Gee, I lived in Connecticut until 2000. This is one more reason to be happy to be out of there. Governor Rowland would endorse human sacrifice if the Planned Barrenhood crowd would send more campaign money and it might even improve tourism (LOL).
14 posted on 04/22/2003 12:34:31 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Ubi Petrus Ibi Ecclesia (Where Peter Is, There is the Church!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk; Beacon Falls
Gee, I lived in Connecticut until 2000.

2000?...I left for good when the RINO WeikerWanker ran for governor on the promise of NO STATE INCOME TAX, and installed one 6 months later!...That was the last straw for me.

FMCDH

15 posted on 04/22/2003 12:52:39 PM PDT by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
So would legalized child protitution....

The mayor was working on that one in Waterbury.....

16 posted on 04/22/2003 1:55:54 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Mesopotamia Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
That makes you a lot smarter than I was. I stayed to fight him and his putrid and corrupt income tax and all we got was John Rowland.
17 posted on 04/23/2003 8:34:51 AM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Ubi Petrus Ibi Ecclesia (Where Peter Is, There is the Church!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
...all we got was John Rowland.

What?!...No T-Shirt?!

FMCDH

18 posted on 04/23/2003 12:16:34 PM PDT by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
And how many gay marriages have been performed in Vermont?
19 posted on 04/23/2003 12:18:26 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson