Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3 Indicted in Transporting Undocumented Immigrants
SaltLakeTrib.com ^ | April 19, 2003

Posted on 04/19/2003 11:34:35 AM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29

A federal grand jury indicted three people this week on charges of participating in a conspiracy to harbor and transport eight to 10 groups of undocumented immigrants in Utah and elsewhere.

Jose Ramon Navarro-Corral and Alfredo Lara-Lizaola knowingly conspired "with each other and other co-conspirators" sometime before Jan. 29 to take custody of the immigrants, who were smuggled from Mexico into the United States and taken to Phoenix, according to the indictment filed Wednesday.

The two allegedly housed the immigrants in a Phoenix apartment, bought vehicles and hired drivers to transport them elsewhere, court documents said.

Other conspirators paid both defendants, prosecutors allege; Navarro-Corral accepted $100 per person and Lara-Lizaola was given between $300 and $350 for each group.

On Jan. 29, documents said, Navarro-Corral took custody of a group of Brazilian nationals smuggled into the United States from Mexico, and was told to take the group to Washington state. He allegedly took them to Lara-Lizaola, who agreed to house them, documents said, and also hired two drivers and obtained a vehicle to make the Jan. 31 trip.

Navarro-Corral is also known by the names Mario C. Valdez and Antonio Salvidar, the indictment said. The indictment does not say what happened to the people being transported.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2003 11:34:35 AM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
See also this post, which got put on the wrong forum.
2 posted on 04/19/2003 11:37:32 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
"and was told to take the group to Washington state. ..."

Oh please, not here, we're already crawling with illegals.

3 posted on 04/19/2003 11:56:27 AM PDT by holyscroller (Why are Liberal female media types always ugly to boot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
I wonder what kind of punishment those two will get? A couple of years in jail? Probation? Unfortunately, our judicial system is too lenient and can't/not willing to deal effectively with such crimes. Until this country gets serious about protecting us from this constant flow of illegals (oh, excuse me, "undocumented"), we can't be safe. This is just one example, not even the proverbial "tip-of-the iceburg" of what's really going on.
4 posted on 04/19/2003 1:10:30 PM PDT by SamiGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; B4Ranch; FITZ; Reaganwuzthebest; hsmomx3; Tancredo Fan; Joe Hadenuf; 4Freedom; ...
ping
5 posted on 04/19/2003 2:31:23 PM PDT by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net, AZAnderson.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
"Oh please, not here, we're already crawling with illegals.",

So's southeastern WI. Is there any state left that's not?

6 posted on 04/19/2003 2:36:12 PM PDT by Ches (Mrs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamiGirl
How true.
7 posted on 04/19/2003 2:40:05 PM PDT by Ima Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ches
Is there any state left that's not?

Some of the Mexican states don't have many left.

8 posted on 04/19/2003 2:45:44 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Some of the Mexican states don't have many left.

We need to change that. Soon.

9 posted on 04/19/2003 3:01:43 PM PDT by Tancredo Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SamiGirl
punishment?

Probably probation, or nothing.

A serious question here. We talk about this, we voice our opinion - some write congressman - what really can we do. Everyday, it is something new that is harmful to this country and it seems no one is listening.

Does anyone have any ideas? We know there are a lot of people concerned and want something done about it - is there any way we can begin to communicate with each other?

10 posted on 04/19/2003 3:32:38 PM PDT by nanny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
A federal grand jury indicted three people this week on charges of participating in a conspiracy to harbor and transport eight to 10 groups of undocumented immigrants in Utah and elsewhere.

Bet they all had Mexican Cracker-Jack Liberal ID Cards too

11 posted on 04/19/2003 3:42:22 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanny; Ches; SamiGirl; Ima Lurker; Tancredo Fan; ought-six; PatrioticAmerican; Psycho_Bunny; ...
Our opinions don't seem to count at the ballot box. All our officials from BOTH major parties are being pressured by the thousands of groups claiming to have concerns about human rights violations, from this country and Mexico. There is an Hispanic Congressional Caucus, LaRaza, MeCha, radical groups, non-radical groups, religious groups, non-religious groups, anti-hate crime legislation, front groups, mostly funded by the usual suspects, Ford, Pew, Tides, Rockefeller, Heinz. Then there's the UN spreading the lie that middle class white Americans use of resources is responsible for all the world's ills. Fox has said he is the president of all Mexico's people, including those who live in the US and has some new agencies throughout our land to help it's citizens who live here get these ID's and whatever else. It's madness. I say register NO PARTY and let the PUBS/DEMS rethink their priorities. A mass bi-partisan movement of the people, as in "WE the People". It's only a mouse click away, in most states. It can't hurt. Could this be too easy? We have to do something for the next generation and the future of our nation. /rant

1st generation American, daughter of LEGAL immigrant.

12 posted on 04/19/2003 4:23:34 PM PDT by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net, AZAnderson.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Madfly,Ever read this?http://www.cis.org/articles/2002/back1402.html
13 posted on 04/19/2003 5:12:32 PM PDT by 4.1O dana super trac pak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madfly; All
Here is something I don't understand.

The other night FOX news was listing countries who had "better shape up or else". They listed various countries, such as France, Germany, Syria, and CANADA!! They gave out the reasons, and they said that Canada is refusing to hand over Iraqis who live there. I didn't hear any further details, but my immediate thought was, "What about Mexico???!" Mexico did not make the list, but it is much more of a danger to us than Canada, as illegals cross over to come here all the time, and Vincente Fox encourages them. In my mind Mexico is much more of a danger than Canada because who knows how many potential terrorists come here from there?

Something is fishy regarding Mexico and the US IMO.

14 posted on 04/19/2003 5:55:45 PM PDT by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madfly
We can't ever forget the pressure of the campaign contributions from the people who are employing these illegals. Personally, I think that is what matters most. Maybe that is just my burden to bear - but I think our President could get around the UN, LaRaza, etc. Just can't get around that old need for money and the need to repay those contributions.
15 posted on 04/19/2003 6:12:54 PM PDT by nanny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madfly
After reading your post again, I think you may have nailed it. It's political and financial. It looks like everything boils down to money and profit, for the Powers that Be of course, not the people. Therefore it's okey for Mexico, but not for Canada.
16 posted on 04/19/2003 6:33:50 PM PDT by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Well said. I haven't been registered as a Republican for several years, changed it in disgust.

It's a shame so many Freepers ignore these threads. I guess Laci Peterson's death is so much more important. < /sarcasm> (Not to make light of her death, but...)

17 posted on 04/19/2003 6:58:47 PM PDT by Ches (Mrs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ches
I also changed my registration from Repub to Independent. On the issue of immigration (legal and illegal), there's no difference between the Dems and the Repubs. My state is absolutely invaded. The RNC still calls for donations, and I always tell them that they won't get another penny from me until they change their tune regarding immigration.
18 posted on 04/19/2003 10:01:40 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo; Free the USA; B4Ranch; FITZ; Reaganwuzthebest; hsmomx3; Tancredo Fan; Joe Hadenuf; ...
Check this out from Allan Wall who lives in Mexico. This should have been in the news here!

DIRECT NEGOTIATION WITH BAGHDAD OVER DUAL CITIZENS?

Opponents of dual citizenship sometimes pose this question – “What would you do if the U.S. and Mexico went to war with each other?” The Iraq war demonstrates that it’s not even necessary to posit this extreme. If the U.S. goes to war with any country, dual U.S.-Mexican citizenship is part of the equation.

In a previous article, I reported how the Fox administration was compiling a list of all Mexican and Mexican-descended personnel in the U.S. military, regardless of citizenship.

Only three days later, Mexican Foreign Secretary Derbez made the rather startling announcement that Mexico was considering direct negotiations with the Saddam regime over U.S. soldiers who are dual citizens of the U.S. and Mexico!

According to “Reforma” (Analizan defender a soldados mexicans, March 31st, 2003)

 “The legal department of the SRE [Mexican Foreign Ministry] is analyzing the viability of Mexico’s intercession before the government of Iraq for Mexican soldiers imprisoned in that country.”

(El departamento Jurídico de la Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores analiza la viabilidad de que México interceda ante el Gobierno de Iraq por los soldados mexicanos presos en ese Pais.)

 “Chancellor Luis Ernesto Derbez said...that the department is studying the possibility of an appeal to the Geneva Convention concerning prisoners of war in the case of soldiers who have the two citizenships (U.S. and Mexican) and of military personnel who have Mexican citizenship and U.S. residence....”

(El canciller Luis Ernesto Derbez dijo la tarde de este lunes que la dependencia a su cargo estudia si es posible apela a la Convención de Ginebra sobre presos de guerra en el caso de los soldados que tengan las dos ciudadanías, así como de los militares que cuentan con la ciudadanía mexicana y la residencia estadounidense y con bases en el Ejército de Estados Unidos.)

“....Derbez emphasized that México will make it clear, that if the petition is carried out, that it will be done without being part of the military conflict.”

(En conference, Derbez destacó que México dejará en clare, si llega a realizar la petición, que lo hace sin ser parte del conflicto militar.) 

So the Mexican government was willing to negotiate with Saddam over dual citizen prisoners-of-war - but it had to make clear it wasn’t supporting the United States!

Now that Baghdad has been taken, the Mexicans have to give up negotiating with the regime. But we know they were working on it. Which is one possible use of that census of Mexican-origin U.S. soldiers I wrote about earlier.

And demonstrates the inevitable complications of dual citizenship.

PROCLAIMING PACIFIST PRINCIPLES, HUSTLING GRINGO CA$H  

On April 2nd, 2003, Vicente Fox met with visiting Mexican residents of the U.S., and self-righteously slammed the U.S. war effort, emphatically declaring that “¡estamos contra la guerra!” – “We are against the war!” (Proceso, April 2nd, 2003)

The same day a Mexican tourism convention in Acapulco was addressed (in a pre-recorded video) by the Mexican president. Fox told them that the war was an opportunity for Mexican tourism! (His reasoning: Americans would want to travel to safer and nearer destinations).

(“Puede guerra ser fuente de oportunidades para turism en Mexico: Fox,” El Universal, April 2nd, 2003  


19 posted on 04/20/2003 8:51:38 AM PDT by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net, AZAnderson.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29; SamiGirl; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Grampa Dave; Cincinatus' Wife; Fiddlstix; ...
ping
20 posted on 04/20/2003 8:55:28 AM PDT by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net, AZAnderson.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson