Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flight Attendants to Vote Again on American Airlines Concessions, Citing Executive Bonuses
Associated Press ^ | Saturday April 19, 1:09 am ET | By David Koenig, AP Business Writer

Posted on 04/18/2003 11:35:41 PM PDT by need_a_screen_name

Associated Press

Employees to Vote on Airline Concessions

Saturday April 19, 1:09 am ET
By David Koenig, AP Business Writer

Flight Attendants to Vote Again on American Airlines Concessions, Citing Executive Bonuses

DALLAS (AP) -- Enraged by an American Airlines plan to give bonuses to top executives, the flight attendants' union said late Friday it would scrap results of a vote that approved concessions the company says it needs to stay out of bankruptcy.

The union said it plans to schedule a new vote.

The company said Friday that executives had decided not to accept the bonuses, which were disclosed after employees voted to accept $10 billion in concessions over six years. Chairman and chief executive Donald J. Carty also apologized for not telling unions about the bonuses sooner.

Still, the president of the flight attendants' union said the company had failed in its obligations to employees.

"The vote is so tainted that we are proceeding with a revote," John Ward, president of the flight attendants' union,

The union's move threatened to push American closer to bankruptcy just two days after flight attendants and members of its two other main unions narrowly approved the concessions, which included wage cuts.

The company had said it would file for bankruptcy if the unions failed to approve the concessions.

After learning of the plan for a new round of voting by the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, American said it stood by the results of the earlier vote.

"American Airlines has a valid, ratified agreement with the APFA," said a company spokesman, Bruce Hicks. He said the company would not comment further.

Leaders of unions representing pilots and ground workers also complained about the bonuses, along with the company's decision to partially fund supplementary pensions for 45 top executives. The pensions would be protected even if American files for bankruptcy.

The unions argued that those moves are inappropriate at a time when the airline was asking employees to ratify pay cuts of 15.6 percent to 23 percent.

American said it would not rescind the added pensions, which it said were necessary to keep senior executives.

American disclosed the bonuses and extra pension benefits late Tuesday in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. They caused an uproar when employees learned of them Thursday.

On Friday, Carty asked the unions for continued cooperation in helping the airline recover from a severe industrywide slump.

"Those executives who have made the personal commitment to remain with American during this financial crisis, myself included, are not here solely for monetary reasons and we have all agreed to give up these retention payments in order to give our employees confidence in management's ongoing commitment to shared sacrifice," he said in a written statement.

Ward said Carty's apology wasn't good enough.

"They had an obligation to provide us with the most reliable, up-to-date information available about the company" before employees voted, he said. "That obviously wasn't the case."

Ward said the new election would begin as quickly as possible. The last one, conducted by phone and the Internet, lasted two weeks. The concessionary pay cuts are scheduled to begin May 1.

In the earlier vote, flight attendants originally rejected their share of concessions -- $340 million a year. But the company agreed to delay a bankruptcy filing and gave attendants an extra day to vote or to change their vote.

The union and the company said the extension was needed because some workers had technical difficulties voting the first time.

With the extra day of voting, flight attendants narrowly approved the concessions.

The bonuses offered to Carty and five other senior executives were equal to twice their salaries, and a seventh official was offered a bonus equal to his salary.

The flap over executive perks has delivered a damaging blow to the already poor management-labor relations at the airline, which has been hit by strikes and a pilot sickout.

"Labor-management relations have been acrimonious ever since I started working here," said Jay Narey, a 16-year flight attendant, "but this is beyond anything I imagined. This has taken the distrust to a new level."

Analysts said American's managers showed poor judgment in approving executive perks while the airline industry slumped, shareholders were losing money and employees were asked to take big pay cuts.

"They basically blackmailed their workers with threats of bankruptcy," said Lance Compa, a Cornell University labor law professor. "It puts a moral onus on management to share the pain."

Much of the employees' anger was aimed at Carty.

"We gave him a new lease on life," Ward said. "We've given him a big opportunity to turn things around because they said they needed $1.8 billion in (annual) employee concessions to make this thing work."

"I will be the first one calling for his resignation if this thing tanks, if the company goes into bankruptcy," Ward said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: again; americanairlines; bonuses; concessions; executive; flightattendants; unionskillingjobs; vote

1 posted on 04/18/2003 11:35:41 PM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: need_a_screen_name
Florida, all over again. If you don't like the results, vote until you do.
3 posted on 04/18/2003 11:49:08 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
"Okay, everyone, I have a perfect compromise: Make the dog pay for the window."

Oh sure, blame EVERYTHING on the dog! What if the dog doesn't have a job? How is he gonna pay without a job? Besides, the dog says where's my bonus!? I say give the dog a pass.... this time.

4 posted on 04/18/2003 11:53:06 PM PDT by teletech (Have we dug up Saddam yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name
No matter how one feels about the executive compensation, the flight attendents are stupid if they vote no just out of spite. They should vote only in the long-term interest of their jobs. If they think that their jobs will stick around if they vote no, then they shoudl vote no. If not, they should vote yes. Voting no just to try to stick it to some corporate jerk is idiotic. If the top execs lose their jobs over a no vote, they will go home to their cushy lifestyles. After the 5 minutes of joy that the flight attendents will have sticking it to top management, they can head down to the unemployment line.
5 posted on 04/19/2003 12:04:21 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name
Something needs to happen that the obsecne bonuses to failed executives stop.
6 posted on 04/19/2003 12:27:58 AM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruth A.
They're afraid of losing their magic executives if they do.
7 posted on 04/19/2003 12:49:53 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name
Oh the irony. A bunch of crooked Execs convinced a bunch of crooked Union bosses that the company was on the verge of going under and they had already tightened their own belts. So the crooked Union bosses fixed the vote so they would get to continue to be Union bosses. Then the bosses find out the execs lied to them.

Oh my goodness. What a bunch of scum and villany...
8 posted on 04/19/2003 1:35:44 AM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name
The whole situation is disgusting. The executive bonuses despite the regular salary cutbacks does steam me to no end. My only assessment is that this is not a company worthy of survival.

There needs to be a new business model.

9 posted on 04/19/2003 4:08:56 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
There needs to be a new business model.

There also needs to be a business "plan" reflecting reality. AA Sr. Mgt. asserts they can get a 30% per seat "premium" over what top competitors charge. Don Carty, Gerard Arpey & the rest of the AMR Executive Board should NEVER be allowed onto another corporate management team. I don't care what union represents their labor groups, when the management team has killed the company. Southwest has ten unions on the property. TEN!

SWA has a better managment team, a resonable business plan, and IS the business model for airlines. I am planning to leave AA after 18 years, and provide the same services as an employer and outside vendor. Also in aircraft sales & support business.

CAArty & his AArrogant cohorts have destroyed my pension plans and those of hundreds of my colleagues.

10 posted on 04/19/2003 6:55:10 AM PDT by illumini (AMERICA. Love her or leave her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name
Time for all the directors to resign at an emergency meeting, and the top management team needs to be cut by at least a third both in salary and in numbers.
11 posted on 04/19/2003 6:58:16 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (going into an election campaign without the paleocons is like going to war without the French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
Which is *WHY* voing "yes" is absolutely WRONG! Voting "no" will give certain protections to the employees, and will see the current management more likely to be booted!!

I am standing firm in my belief that the flight attendants were the only union that had sense about them. Corruption similar to the Clinton/Gore model took that away from them in the second vote.

12 posted on 04/19/2003 7:11:35 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (Still proud of our **"NO!"** vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: illumini
Did you hear about the pilot's union head(s) allegedly trading stocks before the votes? Complaints are already filed with the SEC.
13 posted on 04/19/2003 7:15:20 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (Still proud of our **"NO!"** vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: illumini
Oh...and we might be in need of a job here, very soon. FReepmail me with your employment opportunities. Dh is a renaissance man!
14 posted on 04/19/2003 7:19:40 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (Still proud of our **"NO!"** vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kcvl; bneal
Looks as though the uproar is starting to have some effect!! :)
15 posted on 04/19/2003 7:21:12 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (Still proud of our **"NO!"** vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name; All
Any merit to the argument that says the bonuses (and the pensions funded) were needed in order retain the execs? I mean, if they left now, where would American be able to find better people who know anything about the airline business outside the company?
16 posted on 04/19/2003 7:35:34 AM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name
Personally, I believe there are always better or as good people out there who just don't have the name recognition. After all, these "crackerjack" execs have bungled everything--if we want to hold them accountable for the company. My opinion holds true for our congress who feel the need for pay raises to lure talent into the public sector.
17 posted on 04/19/2003 10:47:52 AM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
"Did you hear about the pilot's union head(s) allegedly trading stocks before the votes? Complaints are already filed with the SEC.

I'm not surprised, and I thought as much when the initial F/A vote results were being closely held secret.

18 posted on 04/19/2003 11:20:44 AM PDT by illumini (AMERICA. Love her or leave her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name
Any merit to the argument that says the bonuses (and the pensions funded) were needed in order retain the execs? I mean, if they left now, where would American be able to find better people who know anything about the airline business outside the company?

If there was any merit to it, it wouldn't have been handled this way. It was monumentally stupid to give out the bonuses, even if the timing wasn't suspect.

At this point, retaining those executives would probably be counter-productive, due to the poisoned atmosphere. I'll venture that the only way American will be able to avoid bankruptcy now is to immediately terminate every one of the executives in question and install a new management team.

If I were an American stockholder, I'd demand it. If the company has to file for bankruptcy, my stock would be practically worthless anyway, so there wouldn't be much to lose.

I thought the unions were idiotic for dragging their feet and bringing American to the edge. But if American does indeed go over that edge, the management will bear the largest amount of responsibility.

19 posted on 04/22/2003 4:51:50 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson