Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I was right about the war ... and my ex-friends were wrong
The Daily Telegraph ^ | April 19, 2003 | Damian Thompson

Posted on 04/18/2003 4:17:33 PM PDT by MadIvan

On the afternoon of Wednesday, April 9, I watched Saddam's statue lurch sideways, and my fingers itched to pick up the phone. But I didn't give in to the temptation. For the past few weeks, my Left-wing friends and I have operated a non-aggression pact, organised around a simple rule: don't mention the war. This is not out of respect for each other's views. It's because we don't want the police to be called.

It was at a dinner party, inevitably, that the friendship-wrecking potential of the Iraq conflict really sank in. I have known Gregory since the 1980s; he carries off the implausibly postmodern combination of graphic designer and practising Anglican with tremendous panache.

He is almost the wittiest person I know, so I felt a pang of disappointment when he explained why he was going on the peace march. "Dubya is such a moron," he said. In my experience, people who call President Bush "Dubya" tend to be morons themselves - the sort who chortle when they say "Torygraph".

So I replied, in the relaxed, conversational tone I use if I really want to drive someone crazy: "You're playing right into Saddam's hands. The blood of his victims will be on your conscience." Within seconds, we were being pulled apart like boys in the playground by a fellow guest, a Jesuit historian.

Another crisis loomed on the day of the march. I was due to see part one of The Trojans at ENO with Ambrose, a theatre director of irreproachably right-on sympathies. My friendship with Ambrose somehow flourishes despite the fact that, if either of us came to power, we would have the other shot. But it requires a lot of lip-biting and, given that he was planning to go on the march, prior diplomacy was clearly in order.

We hammered out a deal: no crowing, no point-scoring, just Berlioz. As it was, he cheated. The production had ham-fistedly cast the Trojans as the victims of September 11.

"Most bizarre," whispered Ambrose. "The Trojans, for all their faults, possessed a certain nobility, whereas surely most civilised people regard the Americans as our enemies."

As I say, my decision not to pick arguments with my anti-war friends wasn't about agreeing to disagree. It was about not trusting myself not to hit them. I don't include in my condemnation people who opposed the war for honourable reasons; I'm referring to those who flirted with the hate-filled anti-Americanism of the "Not in My Name" lobby, some of whose spokesmen licked their lips in anticipation of the "grave humanitarian crisis" that would follow military intervention.

I stuck to my resolve right throughout the campaign: indeed, if I'm being honest, I was glad of it during the hairy days of late March.

Even in the past week, I've refrained from gloating - partly because I've been nervous of what might happen. The anti-war movement is thrashing around like a wounded dinosaur. In the 1950s, the social psychologist Leon Festinger wrote a book called When Prophecy Fails, a hilarious study of a UFO cult whose world collapsed when a threatened global flood failed to materialise.

He minted the term "cognitive dissonance" to describe the desperate feelings created by the non-fulfilment of prophecy. If you want to observe the agonies of cognitive dissonance, look no further than the inverted commas that Robert Fisk of the Independent placed round the "liberation" of Baghdad in his report last week. I wonder if, like Festinger's cult leader, he wept bitter tears when the apocalypse never came.

It seems heartless as well as dangerous to intrude on such grief. But then, yesterday, I walked into a London bookshop and was greeted with a sight that brought me out in goose-pimples of Schadenfreude.

They were clearing away the Chomsky. Yes, the bar-room bore of the anti-imperialist Left was being eased aside to make room for a big pink pile of chick-lit; and when I asked the assistant why, she said: "Well, we thought that now the war is over..."

And I thought: enough is enough. It's time to crow. Time to stand outside London's Arts Theatre and cackle at the sour-faced Islingtonians trooping in to see a show (written before the war and hastily revised, I gather) called The Madness of George Dubya.

Time to write to the Rt Rev Patrick O'Donoghue, Roman Catholic Bishop of Lancaster, and ask him on what information he based his assertion that "hundreds of thousands of Iraqis" would die in the conflict. Time to cut out Fisky's prophecies of the siege of Baghdad and frame them in the bathroom.

Time to pick up the phone to Gregory and say: "The Iraqi people have been liberated - but not in your name."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blair; bush; damianthompson; exfriends; fallofbaghdad; iraq; iraqifreedom; saddam; statue; uk; us; victory; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
I'm chuckling too - one of the few Tories in Islington, mind you. ;)

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 04/18/2003 4:17:33 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; MeekMom; Dutchgirl; Freedom'sWorthIt; Carolina; patricia; annyokie; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 04/18/2003 4:17:44 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Priceless. I don't know which line to pick out. Maybe this one:

"My friendship with Ambrose somehow flourishes despite the fact that, if either of us came to power, we would have the other shot."
3 posted on 04/18/2003 4:29:04 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Or maybe: "They were clearing away the Chomsky."
4 posted on 04/18/2003 4:29:57 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
It sounds like the writer could use some new friends.
5 posted on 04/18/2003 4:30:56 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The last line of the editorial was the kicker.

Those proud of our American and British heritage have earned the right to say it: The liberation of the Iraqi poeple was in our name.

6 posted on 04/18/2003 4:32:46 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Good writer. I particularly like the part about being friends who would have each other shot.
7 posted on 04/18/2003 4:35:14 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I had lunch with a liberal friend today.

The torrent of despair from him and his ilk has been inventive: a seemingly endless waterfall of reasons not to go to war, bleatings about 'now we've really pissed off the terrorists!', Bush-Cheny chicanery in business deals post-Saddam, on and on and on.

Today he was reduced to the pathetic "but they've ruined priceless antiquities!"

I looked at him and and said, "In all honesty, when they're taking sniper fire as they free captives taken from Kuwait in 1991 from an underground prison should any reasonable person give a damn about a friggin' vase?!!!!?"

That shut him up

8 posted on 04/18/2003 4:35:49 PM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Damian Thompson

This guy is cool as hell.

"...my decision not to pick arguments with my anti-war friends wasn't about agreeing to disagree. It was about not trusting myself not to hit them."

It doesn't get any better than that. Thankfully, none of my friends are "Not In Our Name" types, so I haven't been in that position. But I can only imagine what it must be like to be a pro-Bush Brit or European. If it wasn't for the Telegraph and the Sun, I would almost refuse to believe that such a person exists.

9 posted on 04/18/2003 4:39:17 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; All
I've had just the experience. Fortunately, it was via e-mail, or else some wouldn't have survived to tell the tale.
10 posted on 04/18/2003 4:39:25 PM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
A nice editorial, a breath of fresh air.

Of course the entire "antiwar" deal was really anti America and pro socialism, not anti war at all. The Left has always been violent beyond description when it feels violence will serve its needs. And it always falsely uses what would otherwise be good causes (anti war, environmentalism, etc.), sullying them in the process, as levers to promote its hateful agenda.

We should be so grateful that the monster Saddam was toppled with so little loss of life, but to tell you the truth, I think getting rid of him would have been worth considerable sacrifice, it that's what it took. If it hadn't been worth sacrifice, we'd have had no business going in there. However, we had the best of reasons, saving Iraq was a major step in the war to save Western Civilization. What could be more compelling?
11 posted on 04/18/2003 4:43:42 PM PDT by Sam Cree (liberals are the axis of evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Lovely post!
In Marin & Sonoma Counties of Northern Calfornia, where we practically invented cog-dis, millions of "anti-war but really anti-American & suddenly anti-Blair", "Castro is a truly great man & I can't wait to spend my hol's in Cuba ", "Western World Bad/Everyone Else Good", bumper sticker believing, left coast libs were also warming their icy political hands on the prospect of dead bodies piling up--any dead bodies would have done, actually,tho' of course 1,000,000 baby Iraqis & young American volunteers would have been so very welcome.

Times are tough here. Yet another fond hope has been dashed & even Tim Robbins & Susan Surwhatzits can't save the day.

But these culture vultures have weathered rough going before--recall the revelations about Stalin? The hidden life of Mao & wife? Hilary's acceptance of her hubby's wandering member? They made it through all that, so we must not count them out now.

More's the pity.
12 posted on 04/18/2003 4:46:06 PM PDT by nastypumps (nastypumps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Bump!
13 posted on 04/18/2003 4:46:47 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocko
I've got one, my art professor. A nice person, but a leftist and a libertarian both, contradictory positions, but what's that to an artist, I guess.

She doesn't realize that egalitarianism doesn't allow for individual liberty, I guess.
14 posted on 04/18/2003 4:46:53 PM PDT by Sam Cree (liberals are the axis of evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
This cognitive dissonance is powerful stuff. Peter Beinart, the editor of The New Republic, is actually trying to claim victory by saying that conservatives were wrong on the war.
Conservatives keep slamming the press for its negative coverage of the war. But the real problem is that hawks sold the country an easy war.

15 posted on 04/18/2003 4:50:50 PM PDT by Mr. Mulliner (QUANDO OMNI FLUNKUS MORITATI: When all else fails, play dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
I think "libertine socialist" is a better word than "libertarian" for those types. They want free love AND free healthcare.
16 posted on 04/18/2003 4:51:04 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
bump
17 posted on 04/18/2003 4:52:36 PM PDT by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Yes, that definitely makes more sense. Accurate, too.
18 posted on 04/18/2003 4:56:29 PM PDT by Sam Cree (liberals are the axis of evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
"In all honesty, when they're taking sniper fire as they free captives taken from Kuwait in 1991 from an underground prison should any reasonable person give a damn about a friggin' vase?!!!!?"

Outstanding!!! May I use this!!!???!!!

I've said similar things over the past several days -- this is quite articulate.
19 posted on 04/18/2003 5:04:52 PM PDT by alethia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
My congratulations to Damian Thompson on growing up.
20 posted on 04/18/2003 5:14:27 PM PDT by the lone wolf (Good Luck, and watch out for stobor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson