Skip to comments.
Pope's ruling bars Blair from taking Communion with family
The London Times ^
| April 17, 2003
| Richard Owen in Rome and Tom Baldwin
Posted on 04/17/2003 1:05:24 PM PDT by Willie Green
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-269 next last
To: MikeWUSAF
Big problem is this is a "man-made" law of the church, and not of God nor Jesus.
W.W.J.D
This isn't a case of "Believers" and non-believers, this is a case of follow my rule or else.
To: SoothingDave
Lemme get this straight.....Someone chooses to accept Christ and you deny them?
22
posted on
04/17/2003 1:21:29 PM PDT
by
ffusco
("Essiri sempri la santu fora la chiesa.")
To: Willie Green
Hmmm, I can't seem to find the part in the Bible where Jesus instructs 'only those in full communion with Rome can take part in the Eucharist.'
23
posted on
04/17/2003 1:22:13 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: crz
Mille grazie!
24
posted on
04/17/2003 1:22:16 PM PDT
by
ffusco
("Essiri sempri la santu fora la chiesa.")
To: MikeWUSAF; ffusco
I don't see where Jesus said anything about being, "in full communion with Rome." To deny anyone Communion, if they choose to accept it, is FUNDAMENTALLY UN-CHRISTIAN.
1 Corinthians 11:
27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
We simply follow Paul's advice. It is not "fundamentally un-Christian" to prevent those who do not "discern the Lord's Body" from "eating and drinking" themselves to damnation.
In fact it's quite charitable to prevent your brethren from falling into a pit.
SD
To: AdA$tra; jwalsh07; TomSmedley; The Dude Abides; yendu bwam
Ping
26
posted on
04/17/2003 1:22:33 PM PDT
by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: All
Im pretty sure I can file this under removing the beam from your own eye before trying to spot a mote in mine.
27
posted on
04/17/2003 1:22:33 PM PDT
by
Samurai_Jack
(Im just asking)
To: F16Fighter
Excellent point. The Pope is toothless, choosing a straw man to attack in the name of piety. Disgraceful.
28
posted on
04/17/2003 1:24:35 PM PDT
by
ffusco
("Essiri sempri la santu fora la chiesa.")
To: ffusco
Lemme get this straight.....Someone chooses to accept Christ and you deny them? See my post 25.
Do you affirm that the Bread and Wine offered in the Catholic Communion are the actual, physical Real Presence of the Body and Blood of Jesus? Do you believe the Bread and Wine change substance and actually become the Body and Blood?
Or is it symbolic?
If you do not affirm the former, then you are not of one faith with us, and we do you a great favor by preventing you from communing.
SD
To: Willie Green
i come from a Catholic family; however, 20 years ago i became a Protestant... there have been times when i've been present at Catholic communions, (weddings, baptisms, confirmations, etc.,) where the priest invites only the Catholics to participate in the communion ceremony... but i've chosen to take communion anyway... i think the rule is ridiculous... heck, i know i have a relationship with Christ--and i know of several Catholics in my family who do not, yet they are invited to take communion...
To: JohnGalt
Why? Would you prefer the Eps to do likewise?
To: F16Fighter
Wait a minute: Blair is suddenly forbidden to receive Communion, yet known pedophilic priests and CC hierarchal enablers are? Don't buy the Times' spin. It is attrocious.
Blair is not "suddenly" forbidden. This is just a re-affirmation of existing law, which has slipped in practice in some renegade jurisdictions.
And pedophiles are not in a state to receive communion either. But if you knew anything instead of wanting to cast stones, you would know that already.
Leave what you don't understand alone, OK?
SD
To: F16Fighter
I don't know, F16, lots of denominations put restrictions on who can receive communion. It's part of the Catholic theology that anyone can take or leave, but if they want to be Catholic they should adhere to Catholicism and its rules.
But I think he should ban the guilty priests from more than just communion.
33
posted on
04/17/2003 1:26:59 PM PDT
by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: SoothingDave
but it is damned hypocritical for those who have accepted Christ but don't "Conform to Rome".
To: JohnGalt
Side note, at an Episcopalian alter, we accept all baptized Christians.
Very true, but when I was a kid if you weren't confirmed Episcopalian, you got the dreaded blessing.
35
posted on
04/17/2003 1:27:36 PM PDT
by
johnb838
(Free Republic of Iraq)
To: ffusco
I must agree. I don't see what is gained. Perhaps it has something to do with being "unconfessed".
To: SoothingDave
Anyone can accept Christ as their Savior and Lord.
The POPE has no right to deny one of God's children from receiving communion.
Blair didn't choose to receive the sacrement because he wanted a snack- he believes in Jesus, why does that make him unworthy?
37
posted on
04/17/2003 1:29:13 PM PDT
by
ffusco
("Essiri sempri la santu fora la chiesa.")
To: latina4dubya
but i've chosen to take communion anyway Is being ingracious to your hosts a matter of Protestant piety?
If someone politely requests you respect his ceremonies, why would you proudly spit on his request?
Obviously, no one is policing anything and you were not physically prevented from making a mockery of what we hold sacred. But to imagine someone to be so ignorant as you are is laughable.
SD
To: Willie Green
I wish the Pope felt as strongly about pedophile priests as he does about Protestant Christians.
39
posted on
04/17/2003 1:29:17 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: SoothingDave
Love and Charity Bump!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-269 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson