Powell Regrets 1973 U.S. Actions in Chile

WASHINGTON - When a student asked Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) about the 1973 military coup in Chile, the retired general turned diplomat made no secret of his deep misgivings about the U.S. role in that upheaval.

"It is not a part of American history that we're proud of," Powell said, quickly adding that reforms instituted since then make it unlikely that the policies of that Cold War era will be repeated.

The matter might have ended there had not Washington operative William D. Rogers taken notice of Powell's televised comment. Rogers served under Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in 1975-76 as the department's top official on Latin America and maintains a professional relationship with Kissinger.

In a highly unusual move, the State Department issued a statement that put distance between the department and its top official. The statement asserted that the U.S. government "did not instigate the coup that ended Allende's government in 1973" — a reference to the elected president, Salvador Allende.

Rogers was concerned that Powell's comment was reinforcing what he called "the legend" that the Chile coup was a creation of a Kissinger-led cabal working in league with Chilean military officers opposed to Allende. He called the department legal office to point out that there was a pending law suit against the government and Powell's comment was not helpful.

"I also called Kissinger," said Rogers. "I talked to him about it. I wouldn't say he was upset. ... I told Henry I think this is bad stuff. It doesn't help the U.S. legal position."

Rightly or wrongly, Kissinger has been linked to the coup that brought Gen. Augusto Pinochet (news - web sites)'s military government to power.

Rogers said the Chilean military acted not because the United States urged it to do so, "but because they believed that had the Allende regime continued much longer, Chilean liberties would be irretrievably lost."

Peter Kornbluh, a student of Latin American issues, whose book, "The Pinochet File," will be released in September, disputed Rogers' account. "The U.S. government carried out a clear effort to undermine and destabilize Allende's ability to govern, creating the climate necessary for a coup to take place," Kornbluh said.

Rogers insists Kornbluh overstates the case. "Climate is one thing. Instigating a military attack on the civilian regime is quite another."

Kornbluh said the perceived U.S. role in Chile did not end with the coup. He added that the U.S. government helped the Pinochet regime consolidate its power with overt and covert support, "despite the full knowledge of its atrocities."

The notion of Nixon administration involvement in the post-Sept. 11, 1973, period was reinforced last November when 11 residents of Chile filed a complaint against Kissinger and the U.S. government seeking damages for deaths and other rights abuses by the Pinochet government.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, also names Michael Townley, a U.S.-born former Chilean intelligence agent.

Under the long-standing rules, Rogers said Kissinger's role as defendant is assumed by the U.S. government on grounds that Kissinger was not acting as an individual but was carrying out government policy.

Rogers said his main concern is not the court proceeding but the perception that the U.S. government was working hand in hand with Pinochet and his allies to oust Allende.

"The accusation that the U.S. is morally, legally or factually responsible for the coup is a canard," he said. "This is the issue raised by Powell's comment."

The State Department statement that the U.S. government "did not instigate" the coup is more in line with Rogers' view than with Powell's.

As for the suit against Kissinger and the U.S. government, the plaintiffs are seeking compensatory damages "in excess of $11 million" for rights abuses committed in the post-coup period. They also asked for punitive damages in an amount "at least twice the compensatory damages."

They will screw those countries up as they always do. They will take thos countries and transform them from late 20th century to early 16th century in less than a decade. You can call it the Mugabe efect.

Look at Cuba, it has been able to trade with every country save one. The US embargoe is insignificant economically and it's still a basket case.

We just liberated a country with huge oil reserves that thirty years ago was one of the few countries in the middle east with the potential to become a modern nation, at least in the economic sense. The Baathists got in and the rest as they say is history.

As for Brazil, they are going to have to be eventually bitch slapped since Lula made a deal with the military to resurect their nuclear program. Brazil unlike Iraq, Iran or north korea is a far more advanced country with the industrial infrastructure to create WMD's faster than most countries. I hope those guys in Washington are keeping an eye there. We musn't get distracted by what is going on in north korea and iraq that we make the mistake to ignore brazil. If brazil fires up their nuclear program it will force argentina to do the same and it's program was far more advanced than brazil's. Argentina did not produce nuclear weapons but it was in possesion of the entire seven stage cycle for the production of nuclear weapons. There are only seven other countries in that stage of development, five are nuclear armed (USA, France, UK, China, USSR) two are not (Canada, Germany). Brazil may soon join that club if the military is allowed and that will force argentina to crank up it's program again. Another rivalry ala pakistan-india model in the making. I don't think that's where we want to head.

In my dictionary, diplomatic doesn't mean grab your ankles. His apology for 73 shows he is not ready for the big leagues. Does he know exactly what happened? He took the nutty accustations of the left at face value. When a high ranking official of a government apologizes for such an incident does that make his country fiscally culpable. Might the good old American taxpayers have to dig in their wallets for Powell's faux pas?

What no good lefty will ever admit is that housewives, small businessmen and trademen all took to the streets against Allende, as food shipments were interrupted and confiscation of property commenced. Let's not forget that the coward (committed suicide) Allende was a close friend of Fidel.

Thanks to Augusto Pinochet, Chile is now the wealthiest country per capita in South America. In the early 70s, it was still behind Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.