Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's 'Gang Up on Franklin Graham' Time Again: Pentagon Sticking to Its Guns....
AgapePress ^ | April 16, 2003 | Fred Jackson and Jody Brown

Posted on 04/16/2003 11:19:30 AM PDT by Remedy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: Remedy
Since I know how to google, I'm not interested in your pasted articles and links to obscure sources.

If you have anything to say, write it yourself in your own words.

Unless you're a 'bot incapable of writing a simple 3-paragragh essay.

81 posted on 04/16/2003 1:58:08 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Hey, I gotta go for awhile but real quick...

Please cite to me where or how religious freedom gives him the right to preach at a givernmental employee event.

He has no "right" to be invited. But once invited, it would be a violation of his religious rights to be uninvited on the sole basis of his religious expressions (unless they were criminal).

I'm going to have to catch up with you later. Take care.

82 posted on 04/16/2003 1:58:18 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
if there is no right to be invited, please explain how it violates his rights to uninvite him.
83 posted on 04/16/2003 2:01:40 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: breakem
"Of course they don't have a right to receive, but if the government honors the beliefs of there employees people like Graham who insult them will not speak at the work site."

So you would advocate not having any type of Easter observance at all, since that might 'offend' someone. I would presume you'd also advocate doing away with the President's prayer breakfast, having a Congressional chaplain and all of that kind of thing. After all, it might offend someone.

So is that really what you are advocating?

84 posted on 04/16/2003 2:02:12 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
If the president wants a prayer breakfast, I assume he will not have someone lead the prayer who has disrespected his staff.

If someone is offended by the normal celebration of Easter then I say pound sand. However, if it is by a government entity then I say why is the government supporting these particular religious beliefs.

And yes, I'm opposed to paying for Chaplains for the Congress. And I suppose you support it?

85 posted on 04/16/2003 2:05:57 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
xml, I'm sorry but I'm running out of time so this has to be fast...

Calling Islam an evil religion isn't calling Muslims themselves evil so there is no lumping everyone together. The one thing common to most religions is the belief that others are wrong. Remove religion for a second and lets sub-out politics. I believe liberal politics are appalling and wrong. Liberals think I'm wrong. It's part of the definition of our different views. I can't be a conservative AND a liberal at the same time. I still recognize their right to exist, but I'm going to discredit their beliefs every chance I get. That doesn't make me a bigot. It just makes me a person with strong beliefs. And vice versa.

Crummy example but I'm in a hurry. Sorry.

86 posted on 04/16/2003 2:06:20 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Because of the reason....you cannot disqualify someone solely for their religious beliefs.
87 posted on 04/16/2003 2:07:50 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
"If you're going to classify an entire religion as evil, you don't belong at government-sponsored events."

I would agree that one cannot, on behalf of the government, make such comments. But since when does having a certain opinion disqualify someone from participating in a government-sponsored event? And where is that in the constitution?

88 posted on 04/16/2003 2:09:11 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: breakem
"And I suppose you support it?"

I'm for keeping the tradition that has be in place for a very long time, yes.

89 posted on 04/16/2003 2:10:27 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
The first thing that occurred to me when I heard about this earlier today is that - Muslims do not celebrate Easter Holy Week (including Good Friday), so they should just Butt Out!.

No one is forcing them to attend a Good Friday Service.

90 posted on 04/16/2003 2:11:22 PM PDT by peteram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
even if the tradition means spending your tax money so that a bunch of wealthy people can have a full time minister at work. What kind of a conservative are you?

If the Congress members who go home at night and on weekends can't find a place to worship, I don't want them spending my money so they can do it at work.

91 posted on 04/16/2003 2:13:37 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: george wythe

writing a simple 3-paragragh essay

I understand that you need simplicity and probably sympathy. You need small paragraphs for your A.D.D.

92 posted on 04/16/2003 2:13:59 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
He has no right to "qualify" to use your term. So he has not been disqualified. He insulted the religious beliefs of the employees. Why should the employee give him any acknowledgement. Let him preach his ignorance somewhere else.
93 posted on 04/16/2003 2:15:47 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I'm out.
94 posted on 04/16/2003 2:16:57 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
bump
95 posted on 04/16/2003 2:18:34 PM PDT by two23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; aruanan
What exactly do you mean by that? That's crazy talk.

I meant exactly what I typed.

And "crazy talk"? I like how C. S. Lewis put it (my thanks to aruanan for the quote--it seems fitting here):

"A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic--on the level with a man who says he is a poached egg--or else he would be the devil of hell. You must make your choice. Either he was and is the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon; or you can fall at his feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to."
While we obviously disagree, I support your right to call whomever you wish "stupid" or "bigot." Thank God we still have the freedom to think and speak as we wish.
96 posted on 04/16/2003 2:20:18 PM PDT by k2blader (Pity people paralyzed in paradigms of political perfection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Thanks for speaking up. I could not help to see people "piling up on you." Here is someone who agrees.
97 posted on 04/16/2003 2:26:45 PM PDT by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Why would Muslim employees want to attend a Good Friday service led by ANY Christian anyway? I doubt it is mandatory.

Unless we want to eliminate the right of gov't employees to freely express their religion (and Graham is not an employee, just an invited guest) and/or put restrictions on what they can say on their own time regarding religion, or outlaw religious criticism altogether, I don't see how it is fair to single out Graham for his beliefs and expressions by deeming him "unqualified" to lead a service for a Christian holiday just because he thinks Islam is wrong and Muslims are mad about it.

Religion, by its very nature, is not an "all of the above" practice (nor is any deeply held conviction on any issue). You can't claim freedom of religion exists while not allowing people to disbelieve other religions (and freely say so).

Let me point out that Bush also held a Ramadan service (I think it was) and Christians didn't get to pick the attendees.

98 posted on 04/16/2003 3:36:42 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Matt.10
[34] Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
[35] For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
[36] And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

O ye of little faith:

Matt.21
[21] Jesus answered and said unto them, Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and doubt not, ye shall not only do this which is done to the fig tree, but also if ye shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; it shall be done.

99 posted on 04/16/2003 4:23:57 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
It is evident that they hate truth like cockroaches hate the light.
100 posted on 04/16/2003 4:41:36 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson