Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cable's War Coverage Suggests a New 'Fox Effect' on Television
New York Times ^ | 04/16/03 | Jim Rutenburg

Posted on 04/16/2003 6:11:48 AM PDT by MEGoody

Cable's War Coverage Suggests a New 'Fox Effect' on Television By JIM RUTENBERG

The two commentators were gleeful as they skewered the news media and antiwar protesters in Hollywood.

"They are absolutely committing sedition, or treason," one commentator, Michael Savage, said of the protesters one recent night.

His colleague, Joe Scarborough, responded: "These leftist stooges for anti-American causes are always given a free pass. Isn't it time to make them stand up and be counted for their views?"

The conversation did not take place on A.M. radio, in an Internet chat room or even on the Fox News Channel. Rather, Mr. Savage, a longtime radio talk-show host, and Mr. Scarborough, a former Republican congressman, were speaking during prime time on MSNBC, the cable news network owned by Microsoft and General Electric and overseen by G.E.'s NBC News division.

MSNBC, which is ranked third among cable news channels, hired the two shortly before the war in Iraq, saying it sought better political balance in its programming. But others in the industry say the moves are the most visible sign of a phenomenon they call "the Fox effect."

This was supposed to be CNN's war, a chance for the network, which is owned by AOL Time Warner, to reassert its ratings lead using its international perspective and straightforward approach.

Instead, it has been the Fox News Channel, owned by the News Corporation, that has emerged as the most-watched source of cable news by far, with anchors and commentators who skewer the mainstream media, disparage the French and flay anybody else who questions President Bush's war effort.

Fox's formula had already proved there were huge ratings in opinionated news with an America-first flair. But with 46 of the top 50 cable shows last week alone, Fox has brought prominence to a new sort of TV journalism that casts aside traditional notions of objectivity, holds contempt for dissent and eschews the skepticism of government at mainstream journalism's core.

News executives at other networks are keeping a wary eye on Fox News, trying to figure out what, if anything, its progress will mean to them.

"I certainly think that all news people are watching the success of Fox," said Andrew Heyward, president of CBS News. "There is a long-standing tradition in the mainstream press of middle-of-the-road journalism that is objective and fair. I would hate to see that fall victim to a panic about the Fox effect."

The American news media have been here before. Newspaper headlines in World War II clearly backed the Allies. In 1944, The New York Times used the following headline above a photo essay about an air raid: "We Strike at the Japs."

But until Fox News, television news had rarely taken that sort of tone, though opinion has broken through at times. The major networks were first considered bullish on the Vietnam conflict. Then Walter Cronkite editorialized against it.

Still, for all the claims of disinterest from network anchors and correspondents, conservatives believed that they were masking liberal bias.

Rupert Murdoch played off that suspicion when he started the Fox News Channel in 1996, declaring it would take both sides of the political spectrum into account while overtaking CNN. Fox kept most of its political commentary to its prime-time schedule, which it called the equivalent of a newspaper's opinion page.

After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, though, Fox News Channel covered the fighting in Afghanistan with heavy patriotism, referring to "our troops" who were fighting "terror goons." Fox jumped to first in the cable news ratings in January 2002.

The channel has now taken its brand of pro-American journalism to a new level. One recent night, a correspondent in Iraq referred to war protesters as "the great unwashed."

After the first statue of Saddam Hussein fell in Baghdad, Neal Cavuto, an anchor, delivered a message to those "who opposed the liberation of Iraq": "You were sickening then, you are sickening now." Another Fox anchor, John Gibson, said he hoped Iraq's reconstruction would not be left to "the dopey old U.N."

CNN's ratings also rose during the war, to 2.65 million average daily viewers, from 610,000, but CNN trailed Fox, which had 3.3 million. Though MSNBC remained in third place with 1.4 million, it saw its share of the cable news audience grow, and for the first time in years had a sense of momentum.

Fox News executives would not comment for this article, beyond contending that their channel's success had more to do with its reporting than its editorial approach. They noted, for instance, that Fox showed the first live reports from the push to central Baghdad and from Mr. Hussein's palace there.

Fox's success initially seemed to push CNN to reconsider its editorial direction. In 2001, the network's former chairman, Walter Isaacson, made a public show of meeting with Republican leaders in Washington to discuss CNN's perceived liberal bias. Like Fox News and MSNBC, CNN featured an American flag on its screen after Sept. 11.

Since CNN's new chief, Jim Walton, took over last winter the network has reaffirmed its role as an international news network. It is the only one of the three cable-news networks without a flag on its screen now.

MSNBC, on the other hand, has added several features to capture more conservatives, who, along with moderates, make up a larger share of the cable news audience than do liberals, according to analysts.

MSNBC has patriotic flourishes throughout the day. Along with the regular screen presence of an American flag, Mr. Bush's portrait is featured on MSNBC's main set and an "America's Bravest" studio wall shows snapshots of men and women serving in Iraq.

Neal Shapiro, the NBC News president, said MSNBC hired Mr. Scarborough and Mr. Savage to add political equilibrium to its lineup of hosts. Before the war, Mr. Shapiro said, all of them — Chris Matthews, Phil Donahue, Bill Press and Pat Buchanan — opposed the war. Mr. Donahue's program was canceled in February.

"If you have a range of opinion that leaves out a whole part of the country," Mr. Shapiro said, "you're unintentionally sending a message that `you are not welcome here.' "

Erik Sorenson, MSNBC's president, said it was trying to differentiate its report from what he called a mainstream style of automatic questioning of the government.

"After Sept. 11 the country wants more optimism and benefit of the doubt," Mr. Sorenson said. "It's about being positive as opposed to being negative. If it ends up negative, so be it. But a big criticism of the mainstream press is that the beginning point is negative: `On Day 2, we're in a quagmire.' "

MSNBC's programming moves were welcomed by L. Brent Bozell III, founder of the Media Research Center, a conservative media analysis group. "What Fox is doing, and frankly what MSNBC is also declaring by its product, is that one can be unabashedly patriotic and be a good news journalist at the same time," Mr. Bozell said.

Still, MSNBC's moves have news executives and some liberal critics worried that Fox's success will push TV news too far from a neutral tone.

"I'm a huge believer in the forces of the market and the audience's ability to make choices among various channels," Mr. Heyward of CBS said. "What I would not like to see happen is legitimate debate stifled, or journalists' skepticism, heated journalistic inquiry, somehow dampened by a flock of Fox imitators."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bias; cablenews; fox; foxnews; foxnewsratings; media; msnbc; newnormal; news; televisedwar; war; warcoverage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
Seems that Fox News has them running. This quote wins my "They haven't a clue" award for the year: said Andrew Heyward, president of CBS News. "There is a long-standing tradition in the mainstream press of middle-of-the-road journalism that is objective and fair."

Since when were CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS 'objective and fair'? LOL

1 posted on 04/16/2003 6:11:49 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
"I certainly think that all news people are watching the success of Fox," said Andrew Heyward, president of CBS News. "There is a long-standing tradition in the mainstream press of middle-of-the-road journalism that is objective and fair.

BAWAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!! *snort* *giggle* *choke*
STOP! You're killing me!
LOL!!!!!

2 posted on 04/16/2003 6:20:13 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Was this on the opinion page? It certainly represents an opinion no less than the incidents it condemns.
3 posted on 04/16/2003 6:20:18 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
"If you have a range of opinion that leaves out a whole part of the country," Mr. Shapiro said, "you're unintentionally sending a message that `you are not welcome here.' "

He gets it, but we shall see how it translates in the long term.

4 posted on 04/16/2003 6:21:06 AM PDT by StriperSniper (Frogs are for gigging)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Every page of the Times is an opinion page.
5 posted on 04/16/2003 6:21:37 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
MSNBC, on the other hand, has added several features to capture more conservatives, who, along with moderates, make up a larger share of the cable news audience than do liberals, according to analysts.

So, there you have it-- liberals don't even watch the news, but yet, spout off about it. True ignorance.

6 posted on 04/16/2003 6:22:50 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
"But with 46 of the top 50 cable shows"

WOW!!
7 posted on 04/16/2003 6:23:28 AM PDT by GROOVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
If the rest of those alphabet soups are un-biased and objective, I don't know what I'm gonna do with the three dictionaries I have.
8 posted on 04/16/2003 6:23:42 AM PDT by wrbones (Bones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
This coming from the NYT is hysterical. They report only the objective news eh? Strange how all their news reporting about the war was completely wrong… The quagmire that wasn't…
9 posted on 04/16/2003 6:24:33 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Well, O'Reilly's in trouble. CNN's Paula Zahn will be challenging him in her new time slot. O'Reilly's shaking in his boots (from laughing so hard).
10 posted on 04/16/2003 6:27:53 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
But with 46 of the top 50 cable shows last week alone, Fox has brought prominence to a new sort of TV journalism that casts aside traditional notions of objectivity, holds contempt for dissent and eschews the skepticism of government at mainstream journalism's core.

Traditional notions of objectivity? Balderdash! The lamestream media long ago got rid of that. Examples include emphasis on so-called damage to the environment by everything from SUV's to "global warming", portraying most any type of poor person as underprivledged needing more government help and another government" entitlement", and telling us that victims of circumstance are instead victims of doctors, insurance companies, big business, but ignoring that they are most of all victims of lawyers.

11 posted on 04/16/2003 6:28:07 AM PDT by CedarDave (The number of Saddam sightings is rapidly approaching those of Elvis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
a new sort of TV journalism that casts aside traditional notions of objectivity, liberal Leftist spin
12 posted on 04/16/2003 6:29:25 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
You forget that their version of main stream, objective and fair is whatever show the left in the best light and America in the worst way. We the great unwashed masses must be told what to think by the elite.
13 posted on 04/16/2003 6:29:25 AM PDT by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
This is just dripping with that nauseating liberal condescension. They are so clueless about what real,unbiased journalism is.
14 posted on 04/16/2003 6:29:28 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
bump
15 posted on 04/16/2003 6:31:15 AM PDT by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
I couldn't believe that statement either! Ones who promote left wing media bias will never get a clue. And they'll never stop peddeling their garbage as news. Thanks to the 'Fox Effect', their jig is up and more eyes have been opened.
16 posted on 04/16/2003 6:32:10 AM PDT by right wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody; Grampa Dave
Bump & Ping
17 posted on 04/16/2003 6:32:42 AM PDT by EdReform (Thank You to ALL Freepers and Lurkers who support Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Does anyone else detect extreme nervousness in the media and in Hollywood?
.
ISN'T IT WONDERFUL !!!
18 posted on 04/16/2003 6:32:59 AM PDT by Preachers Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
I noticed that the war coverage changed as the three weeks went on. MSNBC really started moving right and actually had some of the best live war coverage of any of the channels. Impressive. But I think we all know that Fox is the best in terms of news and events. I love their commentators and contributors -- Mansour Ijaz, Col. Hunt, Bob Bevelaqua, (and a host of other military advisors who were terrific). I also enjoy the political commentary. They can really get the lefties on the run!!!
19 posted on 04/16/2003 6:33:02 AM PDT by alethia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Whenever ABCCBSNBSCNNNTY et al talk about how they are unbiased, or anyone for that matter, we can always beat them over the head with CNN and how the kowtowed to Saddam for over twelve years. Unbiased indeed!
20 posted on 04/16/2003 6:33:41 AM PDT by 7thson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson