Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hong Kong SARS Turns Deadlier.
perloin

Posted on 04/15/2003 6:55:12 AM PDT by per loin

Hospitalized Hong Kong SARS (Chicom Flu) Cases
Time Cases Increase Disposition Dead as % of prior time
Day Date New Week Total One Day Week Got well Dead Total Gone Now In Hospitals Total Hosp Days Week 2 Week 3 Week
Day Total % Day Total % Day Total % Day Total %
Wed 03/12 10 10 10 10 100.0% 10
Thu 03/13 14 24 140.0% 14 24 100.0% 34
Fri 03/14 5 29 20.8% 5 29 100.0% 63
Sat 03/15 8 37 27.6% 8 37 100.0% 100
Sun 03/16 5 42 13.5% 5 42 100.0% 142
Mon 03/17 53 95 126.2% 53 95 100.0% 237
Tue 03/18 28 123 123 29.5% 28 123 100.0% 360
Wed 03/19 27 140 150 22.0% 1400.0% 5 5 3.3% 5 5 3.3% 10 10 6.7% 17 140 93.3% 500 50.0%
Thu 03/20 23 149 173 15.3% 620.8% 0 5 2.9% 1 6 3.5% 1 11 6.4% 22 162 93.6% 662 25.0%
Fri 03/21 30 174 203 17.3% 600.0% 2 7 3.4% 0 6 3.0% 2 13 6.4% 28 190 93.6% 852 20.7%
Sat 03/22 19 185 222 9.4% 500.0% 0 7 3.2% 2 8 3.6% 2 15 6.8% 17 207 93.2% 1,059 21.6%
Sun 03/23 25 205 247 11.3% 488.1% 0 7 2.8% 2 10 4.0% 2 17 6.9% 23 230 93.1% 1,289 23.8%
Mon 03/24 13 165 260 5.3% 173.7% 5 12 4.6% 0 10 3.8% 5 22 8.5% 8 238 91.5% 1,527 10.5%
Tue 03/25 26 163 286 10.0% 132.5% 2 14 4.9% 0 10 3.5% 2 24 8.4% 24 262 91.6% 1,789 8.1%
Wed 03/26 30 166 316 10.5% 110.7% 2 16 5.1% 0 10 3.2% 2 26 8.2% 28 290 91.8% 2,079 6.7% 100.0%
Thu 03/27 51 194 367 16.1% 112.1% 3 19 5.2% 0 10 2.7% 3 29 7.9% 48 338 92.1% 2,417 5.8% 41.7%
Fri 03/28 58 222 425 15.8% 109.4% 6 25 5.9% 1 11 2.6% 7 36 8.5% 51 389 91.5% 2,806 5.4% 37.9%
Sat 03/29 45 248 470 10.6% 111.7% 18 43 9.1% 1 12 2.6% 19 55 11.7% 26 415 88.3% 3,221 5.4% 32.4%
Sun 03/30 60 283 530 12.8% 114.6% 21 64 12.1% 1 13 2.5% 22 77 14.5% 38 453 85.5% 3,674 5.3% 31.0%
Mon 03/31 80 350 610 15.1% 134.6% 15 79 13.0% 2 15 2.5% 17 94 15.4% 63 516 84.6% 4,190 5.8% 15.8%
Tue 04/1 75 399 685 12.3% 139.5% 5 84 12.3% 1 16 2.3% 6 100 14.6% 69 585 85.4% 4,775 5.6% 13.0%
Wed 04/2 23 392 708 3.4% 124.1% 5 89 12.6% 0 16 2.3% 5 105 14.8% 18 603 85.2% 5,378 5.1% 10.7% 160.0%
Thu 04/3 26 367 734 3.7% 100.0% 9 98 13.4% 1 17 2.3% 10 115 15.7% 16 619 84.3% 5,997 4.6% 9.8% 70.8%
Fri 04/4 27 336 761 3.7% 79.1% 1 99 13.0% 0 17 2.2% 1 116 15.2% 26 645 84.8% 6,642 4.0% 8.4% 58.6%
Sat 04/5 39 330 800 5.1% 70.2% 8 107 13.4% 3 20 2.5% 11 127 15.9% 28 673 84.1% 7,315 4.3% 9.0% 54.1%
Sun 04/6 42 312 842 5.3% 58.9% 9 116 13.8% 2 22 2.6% 11 138 16.4% 31 704 83.6% 8,019 4.2% 8.9% 52.4%
Mon 04/7 41 273 883 4.9% 44.8% 11 127 14.4% 1 23 2.6% 12 150 17.0% 29 733 83.0% 8,752 3.8% 8.8% 24.2%
Tue 04/8 45 243 928 5.1% 35.5% 11 138 14.9% 2 25 2.7% 13 163 17.6% 32 765 82.4% 9,517 3.6% 8.7% 20.3%
Wed 04/9 42 262 970 4.5% 37.0% 4 142 14.6% 2 27 2.8% 6 169 17.4% 36 801 82.6% 10,318 3.8% 8.5% 18.0%
Thu 04/10 28 264 998 2.9% 36.0% 12 154 15.4% 3 30 3.0% 15 184 18.4% 13 814 81.6% 11,132 4.1% 8.2% 17.3%
Fri 04/11 61 298 1,059 6.1% 39.2% 15 169 16.0% 2 32 3.0% 17 201 19.0% 44 858 81.0% 11,990 4.2% 7.5% 15.8%
Sat 04/12 49 308 1,108 4.6% 38.5% 46 215 19.4% 3 35 3.2% 49 250 22.6% 0 858 77.4% 12,848 4.4% 7.4% 15.8%
Sun 04/13 42 308 1,150 3.8% 36.6% 8 223 19.4% 5 40 3.5% 13 263 22.9% 29 887 77.1% 13,735 4.8% 7.5% 16.2%
Mon 04/14 40 307 1,190 3.5% 34.8% 6 229 19.2% 7 47 3.9% 13 276 23.2% 27 914 76.8% 14,649 5.3% 7.7% 18.1%
Tue 04/15 42 304 1,232 3.5% 32.8% 14 243 19.7% 9 56 4.5% 23 299 24.3% 19 933 75.7% 15,582 6.0% 8.2% 19.6%
Averages 35 258 17.7% 197.0% 9 11.0% 2 3.0% 11 14.0% 27 88.8% 9.3% 18.6% 40.1%
Day Total % Day Total % Day Total % Day Total %
Day Date New Week Total One Day Week Got well Dead Total Gone Now In Hospitals Total Hosp Days Week 2 Week 3 Week
Time Cases Increase Disposition Dead as % of prior time


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: sars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: Fitzcarraldo
Obviously, if all this is true, then SARS cannot be contained. (It's too soon to know for sure.)

BTW: What happens in a world wide pandemic?
81 posted on 04/15/2003 3:20:21 PM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: CathyRyan
I'm not going to panic until Dan Rather tells me to, or it becomes the consensus here on FR, whichever comes first.

Seriously, my wife and I have discussed this since we live in a densely populated area that has at least one case already. We will not attempt escape nor will we take any precausionary measures since none seem to work. No one lives forever.
82 posted on 04/15/2003 3:22:36 PM PDT by IYAAYAS (AMMO rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

To: CathyRyan
The statistics I saw on the 1918 Spanish Flu in the United States were:
25% of the population infected.
2.5% mortality rate.
0.5% overall death rate.

We don't know what percent of the population would be infected by SARS, but the mortality rate would be a lot more than 2.5%.

Sample calculation:
75% of the population infected (no prior immunities).
20% mortality rate (not nearly enough ICU capacity).
15% overall death rate.

Result: In a population of 280 million people there would be 42 million deaths. If only 25% of the population was infected, the calculation would give 14 million deaths.

This assumes no panic in the population, and no breakdown in essential services.
84 posted on 04/15/2003 3:42:00 PM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
SARS may exist in persons as an asymptomatic disease. These must be tracked as well.

You are absolutely correct. One cannot build a model without complete information. There are several important factors missing from this equation. Here is a great book with all the facts, for those of you who want to panic. Here's the condensed version: Wash or sanitize hands. Keep hands off face and fingers out of noses and eyes. Wash hands. Avoid touching public surfaces.

85 posted on 04/15/2003 4:01:44 PM PDT by TaxRelief (If you want, I'll sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
This other SDA link has a different listing of symptoms:

Signs: (may include one or more, and may be different for each rat in the colony)
-Excessive sneezing
-Exophthalmos (abnormal protrusion - bulging of the eyes)
-Squinting, excessive blinking, eye rubbing
-Chromodachryorrhea (red tears, excessive porhyrins are secreted with tears)
-Swollen face and neck
-Lesions (damaged cell tissue) in the lacrimal duct may result in corneal drying with severe secondary ocular lesions (dry eyes, conjunctivitis, ulcers of the cornea, bleeding inside the eye).

86 posted on 04/15/2003 4:05:37 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: All; backhoe
New SARS cluster in Toronto raises questions.
87 posted on 04/15/2003 4:19:06 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: All
Doctors save baby of pregnant SARS victim .
88 posted on 04/15/2003 4:20:06 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: All
Intense Hunt Is On to Find Existing Drug That Works.

The new studies may show that ribavirin does not inhibit the growth of the new human coronavirus. However, that does not necessarily mean it is of no clinical use in SARS. First, I don't think it's yet absolutely certain that that coronavirus is the cause of SARS. Second, even if it is, then, if the resulting secondary infections that are the real problem, ribavirin may still inhibit secondary viral infections.

89 posted on 04/15/2003 4:26:14 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: All
Nevada First SARS Case
90 posted on 04/15/2003 4:26:33 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I'm debating whether I should try to catch SARS now, while ICU beds are available, or whether I should wait until they're all full, and try to live in a bubble.

I'm mostly joking, but not entirely...

91 posted on 04/15/2003 4:30:14 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I'm debating whether I should try to catch SARS now, while ICU beds are available

Since catching it now may not confer immunity against a future infection you may wish to consider an alternative strategy.

92 posted on 04/15/2003 4:32:15 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
There are apparently several strains of SDA in rats, some much more dangerous than others. Becoming infected with a relatively benign form of human coronavirus might provide enough protection to enable one to live through later infection with the worst SARS.
93 posted on 04/15/2003 4:35:02 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
It had better confer immunity or there is no hope for a vaccine.
94 posted on 04/15/2003 4:35:25 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Bump...
95 posted on 04/15/2003 4:36:53 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CathyRyan
I know that health care workers, especially in our ED and doctors' offices, have a low index of suspicion for SARS in our area (rural Ozarks). However, every year we have millions, yes, millions of tourists from all over the world. The area hospitals have few rooms for negative air flow, and while we ALL know how to prevent infection, I have a little concern that somebody somewhere may not take it too seriously, especially if the patient doesn't require a vent....

The very long hospitalization times would definitely strain resources to the max if there were very many patients, because while there may be an outbreak, you still have the "ordinary" patients suffering from other illnesses that may require ventilators...how would a choice be made?

If I'm part of a team taking care of a SARS patient, I might not want to leave the hospital or go home...what if I had a subclinical infection and passed it along?

I'm wondering how long the virus lingers on clothing, bedding, walls, tv remotes...a smallpox outbreak in Germany in the 70s was spread by housekeeping/laundry personnel, if I remember correctly.

If family visits the patient (let's assume one for the time being) what if they carry infectious material away to local merchants, other hospital patients walking in the hallways, or back to their homes? Even with mask, gown and gloves--by the way, wouldn't we have to fit every visitor with an N95 mask and discard it in the isolation room's vestibules, disinfect the visitor before leaving, and on every visit re-fit the mask--the virus might get out...

I can imagine someone saying that SARS patients could have no visitors...it would take security personnel to keep some of them out...("My God, my wife is calling for me, I'm not going to just stand here!"--or a mother with her child, a daughter with her aged mother, this is a nightmare) I hope you can understand what I'm getting at with this post--how on earth do we deal with this?



96 posted on 04/15/2003 4:37:35 PM PDT by Judith Anne (God bless our soldiers with swift victory...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Becoming infected with a relatively benign form of human coronavirus might provide enough protection to enable one to live through later infection with the worst SARS.

Wouldn't that be interesting if the best defense to SARS is to catch the common cold this year?

97 posted on 04/15/2003 4:37:55 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
In the 18th century, before Jenner's vaccination with cowpox became the method, what people did to avoid the worst smallpox was to get themselves inoculated, i.e., infected with smallpox (variola) through the skin. Inoculation carried with it a death rate of 2 or 3%, but that was much better than the 30% death rate and vicious scarring for inhaled smallpox.
98 posted on 04/15/2003 4:39:13 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I've always marvelled at the bravery (and perhaps stupidity) of someone who would be the first to try such a thing.

"Hmmm, let me see if intentionally giving myself smallpox is a good idea..."

"I'll bet a parachute would work..."

99 posted on 04/15/2003 4:47:21 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: CathyRyan
Think of all the personnel who daily come into contact with each patient:

Doctor Er
Doctor on Floor
Nurses in ER
Admissions Personnel
Nurses in shifts on the floor (minimum of six or seven)
Respiratory Therapy
Lab
Radiology
Food Service
Housekeeping

And all these people COULD be exposed before SARS was suspected....Suppose someone infected with SARS comes in with a sick gall bladder, or appendicitis, then shows symptoms after, say, surgery has been done, they've passed through surgery, recovery, another whole team of doctors, nurses, nurse anesthetist or anesthesiologist...if they come down with fever and a cough AFTER the surgery, is it SARS or is it a relatively more normal reaction to the surgery?

What if the surgeon does another surgery or forty before he begins to show symptoms, and sheds the virus to those patients? What if he starts having symptoms during surgery?

I wonder when SARS patients start to shed virus? Before the fever and cough? It could happen....


100 posted on 04/15/2003 4:51:08 PM PDT by Judith Anne (God bless our soldiers with swift victory...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson