Posted on 04/14/2003 5:05:08 AM PDT by kattracks
U.S. Takes Presidential Palace in Tikrit
By BORZOU DARAGAHI .c The Associated Press
TIKRIT, Iraq (AP) - Backed by warplanes and helicopters, U.S. troops poured into Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit and fought pockets of hard-core defenders Monday in a bid to crush the last major stronghold of Iraqi resistance.
The presidential palace was seized without a fight, the military said, and large numbers of U.S. troops were visible in the central Tikrit in the afternoon.
``There was less resistance than we anticipated,'' said Brig. Gen. Vincent Brooks, U.S. Central Command spokesman, noting that Tikrit's defenders had been subjected to punishing airstrikes over the past several days.
U.S. forces suspected about 2,500 die-hards of the Republican Guard and the paramilitary Fedayeen - and possibly officials from the Iraqi president's regime - were holed up in the city, Matthew Fisher, a reporter covering the Marines for Canada's National Post, told CNN.
However, Marines were encountering only pockets of enemy fighters after many Republican Guard and Special Republican Guard forces abandoned their equipment in recent days, said Capt. Frank Thorp, a Central Command spokesman.
He said U.S. forces to the south and west of the city had created checkpoints to prevent possible regime leaders from escaping.
He said the fighting on the ground was fierce. Thorp said that he had no information on casualties but that U.S. forces had defeated the Iraqis in every engagement in Tikrit.
``The outcome is not in doubt. That's the difference between when we were in Nasiriyah and Najaf or something like that,'' he said.
Marine First Lt. Greg Starace of Paramus N.J., said his unit entered the city limits just after dawn Sunday. He estimated at least 3,000 American troops were in Tikrit. Tanks and Humvees rumbled through, and a line of armored vehicles was parked in front of a bazaar.
``As soon as we got here we had some engagements against some small pockets of resistance,'' he said.
The morning combat came after a night of heavy bombing and after Marines made several forays in and out of the city Sunday, drawing occasional small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades.
The assaults Sunday did not encounter the intense battle that once seemed likely. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said there was ``no organized resistance'' in Tikrit.
``A lot of people have disappeared, including the leadership of the Baath party,'' Rumsfeld told MSNBC on Sunday. ``There are people (in Tikrit) who do not have a lot of admiration for the Baathist regime ... who are helping'' the Americans, he told NBC.
The Americans destroyed a tank column moving outside the town Sunday and killed a platoon of 15 to 20 Iraqis who attacked the Marines' armored vehicles, the operation's commander, Brig. Gen. John Kelly, told the New York Times correspondent.
Cobra helicopters also destroyed six fully loaded but unmanned anti-aircraft guns on the city outskirts before U.S. troops in light armored vehicles began moving into Tikrit on Monday morning, the Marines said.
As they moved from Baghdad to Tikrit, the Marines rescued seven American prisoners of war held by the Iraqis for three weeks.
The Arab TV network Al-Jazeera reported that local tribal groups in Tikrit offered to negotiate peace with U.S. forces and hand over some Baath Party leaders in town. The tribal groups said the regular army, Republican Guards and Fedayeen Saddam reportedly left the city five days ago.
Tikrit, 90 miles north of Baghdad, is the last major city with substantial resistance by Iraqi forces. Saddam was born in the area, and many members of his inner circle come from the region.
After the fall of Baghdad last week, U.S. commanders cautioned that Saddam's regime might try to hold on ferociously to Tikrit. But they played down that possibility in recent days because of desertions and damage from sustained airstrikes.
Before the Marines' arrival in Tikrit, live footage aired by CNN showed no signs of active Iraqi defenses, suggesting that days of bombing had achieved their intended effect. On the road connecting Tikrit and Tuz Khurmatu in the east, there were many abandoned checkpoints, bunkers, foxholes and an artillery position.
Unlike in other major Iraqi cities, however, the many portraits, banners and statues of Saddam remained undamaged. There were no reports of looting.
``We like Saddam Hussein and he has educated our people and we will support him to the end,'' said Abdul al-Jabouri, part of a large group of men gathered at a gas station.
However, another man approached and said, ``Long live the United States.''
04/14/03 07:56 EDT
|
|
|
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
I can't believe this pathetic excuse for a culture was ever feared by anyone.
Just wait until he sees the artwork in the palace.
The Iraqi response was positively Gallic in its inadequacy.
He might want to be careful who he says that around. Some guy who lost a daughter to Saddam may think differently about his freedom of speech.
I know what you mean, in a conventional military sense. However, don't forget that the terrorist mentality is strongest in that neck of the woods, and their religion endorses lying when it's expedient. So their cowardice, combined with their fanaticism, combined with their dishonesty, does make them a threat, in terms of things like terrorist use of WMD.
Be sure and see this:
New Reality: On The Ground In The Middle East
Now, it's as if a dam, that was holding back the good news, has burst and the pitiful liberals like Peter Jennings, et al, are drowning in it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.