Skip to comments.
New Firefight in Baghdad
Fox News
| 4/13/03
Posted on 04/13/2003 2:21:00 PM PDT by areafiftyone
Its on TV Now you can hear the firefight in Baghdad!
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baghdad; fedayeen; iia; iraqifreedom; marines; palestinehotel; usmc; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-234 next last
To: All
One they think was Egyptian and was asking for water!
201
posted on
04/13/2003 4:08:13 PM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Is he dead yet? He's dead Jim!)
To: areafiftyone
One asking for water....used Egyptian word for it!
To: Carolinamom
We're good! ;-)
203
posted on
04/13/2003 4:08:58 PM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Is he dead yet? He's dead Jim!)
To: Carolinamom
Are you aware that non-uniformed combatants, like these Islamikazis, are not legally entitled to the protections of the Geneva Conventions and can be executed on the spot, even if they surrender?
They are damned lucky that they are being held prisoner instead of laying face down in a pool of their own blood and brains.
We're being to damned lenient with those barbarian savages, as far as I'm concerned.
204
posted on
04/13/2003 4:08:59 PM PDT
by
Yankee
To: areafiftyone
Last night I was on edge...this is right up there!
MSNBC- sounds like one is egyptian after one of the
snipers asked for water
205
posted on
04/13/2003 4:09:50 PM PDT
by
thasea
To: Normal4me
Thought shots of their faces were supposed to be off limits at all times. They did the first interrogation in the back of the amtrack, the reporters chased them when the marines ran back to the hotel. Before the marines chased the media back to the stairwell, heard lots of taliking. Arab speaker on MSNBC says the accent of one was Egyptian.
206
posted on
04/13/2003 4:09:56 PM PDT
by
CedarDave
(Latest CNN acronym: "Coverup News Network")
To: Yankee
Ollie North said that friendly Iraqis called them "foreigners."
To: CedarDave
They yelled at the reporters to go down the stairs because they were recording the faces. It was too late we saw them!
208
posted on
04/13/2003 4:10:58 PM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Is he dead yet? He's dead Jim!)
To: Yankee
Right you are -- they are not in uniform. Just another gutter-rat terrorist.
209
posted on
04/13/2003 4:13:10 PM PDT
by
CedarDave
(Latest CNN acronym: "Coverup News Network")
To: Normal4me
I may be wrong but I think they can show a capture but not a "interrogation" once in custody.
I heard it explained once that live coverage of an event in progress is not the same as a purposeful public display by a government of POW'S. (source unknown and I paraphrase anyway)
To: Yankee
yeah but this is in full view of every journalist in baghdad-look this way we show the world how skilled our forces are
211
posted on
04/13/2003 4:13:33 PM PDT
by
arielb
To: arielb
I heard a journalist on MDNBC today say the marines had to protect him and he was shocked at the discipline of the 20 year old men. They shot when commanded to. They stopped firing when commanded not to. They were calm in the heat of battle and deliberate in their actions. AREN'T WE PROUD??? THIS IS OUR YOUTH IN ACTION!
To: Normal4me
I may be wrong but I think they can show a capture but not a "interrogation" once in custody. Anyone??Absolutely right.
Judge Andrew Napolitano covered the relevant law about this on "The Big Show", when our POWs we're paraded on TV.
During fighting action, and as they are being taken into custody, there is no prohibition against showing prisoners.
You cannot produce them at a later time for propaganda purposes, or put them on public display, or subject them to public ridicule or public interrogation.
213
posted on
04/13/2003 4:17:37 PM PDT
by
Yankee
To: sheikdetailfeather
OOPS! MSNBC!
To: Shooter 2.5
The jacket has nothing to do with it's range.Tell it to the people killed at Carowinds. That was a mile journey.
215
posted on
04/13/2003 4:18:12 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: Yankee
Are they considered to be POW's?
To: sheikdetailfeather
Are they considered to be POW's?If you are talking about the non-uniformed combatants, it is my understanding that the U.S. is according them the same POW status as uniformed combatants.
That is a call that our leadership is making. We are not legally required to do so.
In WWII for example, such freelancers were often executed right where they were captured. They are legally classifiable as spies or clandestine agents.
By the way. The definition of "uniform" in this legal sense refers to an insignia or emblem in plain view, which identifies the wearer to be part of a unit under a nation's military command structure.
You do not have to be dressed completely from hat to boots to be "in uniform" in this narrow legal definition.
217
posted on
04/13/2003 4:30:26 PM PDT
by
Yankee
To: sheikdetailfeather
I forgot to add that in Afghanistan, we did segregate them.
Uniformed enemy troops were held as POWs and repatriated, whereas non-uniformed Al-Qaeda are being detained indefinately at Guantanamo.
Napolitano explained that although we are treating "foreign fighters" as POWS now, we reserve the right to reclassify them at a later time and treat them accordingly.
They may wind up at Gitmo, and not be repatriated to their countries, like the Iraqis "regulars" probably will be.
218
posted on
04/13/2003 4:37:01 PM PDT
by
Yankee
To: AppyPappy
Tell it to the people killed at Carowinds.I don't know what Carlwinds is but if you think for a second that the jacket has anything to do velocity, you're sadly mistaken.
219
posted on
04/13/2003 5:02:24 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
Comment #220 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-234 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson