Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Sand Wall (The Problem of "Saddamism" in the Middle East)
New York Times ^ | 4/13/03 | THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Posted on 04/13/2003 1:18:58 PM PDT by bdeaner

As Berlin Walls go, the 20-foot-high dirt berm around Iraq's southern port of Umm Qasr — the first wall to fall in the liberation of Iraq — isn't much to look at, but it's a fitting symbol for this war. It is a sand wall, easily breached by American power, exposing a rotten dictatorship with little popular support on the other side. This area is full of regimes protected by such sand walls.

But unlike the Berlin Wall, whose fall unleashed a flowering of freedom all across Eastern Europe, the fall of the Sand Wall alone will not do that. There are still two other walls holding back the explosion of freedom in the Arab East — much harder walls — that will also have to fall.

The first is the wall in the Arab mind. I hit my head against that wall two weeks ago in Cairo, while discussing the war with Egyptian opposition journalists in Feshawi's teahouse, the writing hangout of Naguib Mahfouz. These journalists could see nothing good coming from the U.S. "occupation" of Iraq, which they insisted was being done only to put Arabs down, strengthen Israel and extract oil.

Such encounters made clear to me that America was not just at war with Saddam, but with Saddamism: an entrenched Arab mind-set, born of years of colonialism and humiliation, that insists that upholding Arab dignity and nationalism by defying the West is more important than freedom, democracy and modernization.

Throughout this war, Saddamism was peddled by Al Jazeera television, Arab intellectuals and the Arab League. You cannot imagine how much distress there is among certain Arab elites that the people of Iraq preferred liberation by America to more defiance under Saddam. The morning after Baghdad was liberated, Abdul Hamid Ahmad, editor of The Gulf News, wrote, like so many of his colleagues: "This is a heartbreaking moment for any Arab, seeing marines roaming the streets of Baghdad."

The wall of Saddamism, which helped bad leaders stay in power and young Arabs remain backward and angry, was as dangerous as Saddam. "The social, political, cultural and economic malaise in this part of the world had become a threat to American security — it produced 9/11," said Shafeeq Ghabra, president of the American University of Kuwait. "This war was a challenge to the entire Arab system, which is why so many Arabs opposed it. The war to liberate Kuwait from Iraq [in 1991] was outpatient surgery. This war was open-heart surgery."

But this open-heart surgery will succeed in toppling both Saddam and Saddamism only if we are successful in creating a healthy Iraq — an Arab state where people can find dignity, not just by saying no to the West, but by building a decent, tolerant, modernizing society that they can be proud of, an Arab state where people can speak the truth and that other Arabs would want to emulate. The widespread looting that has followed the fall of Saddam tells me just how hard that will be. So far, all that we have unleashed in Iraq is chaos, not freedom. There is no civil society here. We are starting from scratch.

And then we must also take down the third wall — the wall of cement, fear and barbed wire being erected between Israelis and Palestinians. We must defuse this conflict. If we let this Israeli-Palestinian wall stand, it will reinforce the wall of Saddamism. Arab dictators will hide behind this conflict as an excuse not to change, Arab intellectuals will use it to delegitimize U.S. power out here, and the enemies of the new leaders in Iraq will use it to embarrass them for working with us.

When one of the Egyptian journalists at Feshawi's insisted that we were out to "occupy Iraq," I quoted to him a line from Colin Powell: America is as powerful as any empire in history, but when it has invaded other countries the only piece of land it has ever asked for was a tiny plot to bury its soldiers who would not be returning home. He actually smiled at that.

The moment reminded me of something the Arab columnist Rami Khouri liked to say, that Arabs for too long have seen the strength of America, but not the "goodness" of America. Partly that's because their media willfully distorted what we did, and partly it's because America has used its power out here more to defend oil and Israel than democracy. This war in Iraq was meant to bring the idealistic side of U.S. power into the Arab world.

Our task now is to apply that idealism to rebuilding Iraq and resolving the Palestine question. If we do it right, I am certain the other walls in this region will be taken down by the people themselves — and never again will we have to ask for even the tiniest plot of land to bury our soldiers here.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: aljazeera; arableague; arabs; bush; colinpowell; democracy; freedom; iraq; israel; kuwait; modernization; palestine; saddamhussein; saddamism; thomaslfriedman; ummqasr
This is an interesting perspective on the Middle East. I hadn't heard the term "Saddamism" before, but this seems accurate to me. The propaganda of Arab news outlets like Al Jazeera will continue to be a problem, and must be dealt with if freedom, democracy and modernization are to ever flourish in the Middle East. But Friedman's solutions ring hollow for me. What are your thoughts, Freepers?
1 posted on 04/13/2003 1:18:59 PM PDT by bdeaner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
DO YOU REMEMBER TOMMY ON ELECTION NIGHT

LET'S DO IT AGAIN IN 04

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 04/13/2003 1:20:43 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner
Like the state dept, I am cautiously optimistic. Southwest Asia has been a collective basket case when it comes to individual rights. The Brits had little luck there, except with India and less with Pakistan.

Still, we did well with postwar Japan and Germany, so hopefully we can do the same in Iraq. Fingers crossed.
3 posted on 04/13/2003 1:37:00 PM PDT by roderick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner
Friedman as always gets it half right. The Arab-Israeli issue has nothing to do with it. Success is always important.

Next we put pressure on Syria. It will fold. They are surrounded.

Next we put pressure on Iran. They fold. We move in and remove their reactor capability.

Next we put pressure on Saudi Arabia. A very tough fight because it must be done solely with pressure. No troops until the kingdom falls. Crush them and Bin Ladenism is finnished. That's our goal.

A performance based "solution" w/o the "old Europeans" is the best that we can be hoped for Israel. It is totally unimportant to our strategy in the Middle East. Where are the Palestinians going to go with Iraq and Syria out of the picture. Yasser Arafat can go pound sand.
4 posted on 04/13/2003 1:43:08 PM PDT by playball0 (Fortune favors the bold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner
*Bump* .... !
5 posted on 04/13/2003 1:50:34 PM PDT by ex-Texan (primates capitulards toujours en quete de fromage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: playball0
yes, once again the "israeli" issue is the sour note here ... the israeli conflict is the scab the Arabs keep picking on as an excuse to avoid the real problems they have.
It's a typical ploy, use it for 'moral high ground'. It's worked before but IMHO wont work with Bush.
He wants Palestinian autonomy, but that issue is not an excuse for manifest Arab problems and misbehavior and lack of accomodation. (eg Syria has made clear they still wont have an agreement with Israel even if there is a palestinian state!).



The real issues: the occupation of lebanon by Syria, the lack of freedom in Syria, the lack of economic progress in Egypt, the Iranian discontent with that thoecracy and its lack of freedom ... backwards monarchies in the Gulf, and a crazy despot in Lybia. This leaves asides the irresponsible dangerous and vicious support for terrorists by many of these states, the global terrorist network thtat still has state sponsorhsip, the pursuit of WMDs by countries like Iran and Libya, and the constant lies and anti-Western and nati-jewish propoganda and media bias they subject their people to.

Fix those problems, and THEN come and tell me how the Israeli conflict is an issue.
6 posted on 04/13/2003 2:59:27 PM PDT by WOSG (All Hail The Free Republic of Iraq! God Bless our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: playball0; WOSG
Yes, he gets it part right - not even half, but at least more right than some liberal columnists.

As for the "Arab humiliation" we keep hearing about, a few points. One, it's not our fault. Two, they could cease being "humiliated" any day if they got rid of their corrupt quasi-dictatorial governments and state-controlled economies, and stopped waiting for "the armies of Allah" to solve their problems for them.
7 posted on 04/13/2003 3:42:17 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

History of Free Republic

8 posted on 04/13/2003 6:30:57 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a Monthly Donor to Free Republic! Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson